Especially client states. That just seems silly.
Is there any confirmation on if this is WAI?
Is there any confirmation on if this is WAI?
- 8
- 5
So why does being a hegemon lower your subjects' opinions of you?
- Thread starter Republic of Mercury
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I noticed the same thing recently. Even if you ignore the possible logical reasons, this is unideal for gameplay purposes.
- 2
Proclaiming yourself the dictator of what ever is probably rarely a popular decision. On the other hand, while people might be angry, they likely aren't gonna show it if you have the power to proclaim that uncontested.
So probably gameplay should have the say. At that point in the game, throwing semi arbitrary speed bumps at the player is just annoying.
So probably gameplay should have the say. At that point in the game, throwing semi arbitrary speed bumps at the player is just annoying.
- 2
- 1
Revolt against centralisation as a last ditch effort? The napoleonic kingdom of sicily revolted to keep his crown after he saw which way the wind was blowing, and the German states swapped sides halfway through a battle
- 2
It has not been concerned this is WAI or not, but this probably isn't. Clear oversight.
You aren't supposed to use vassals. They were made bad on purpose, as a joke.
- 5
- 1
Because paradox hardcoded it to apply to everyone, including your own vassals. They probably forgot that it shouldnt apply to your own vassals.
- 6
- 3
- 1
The greeks under Alexander were chill for a time, so were the Persians. Genghis Khan subjects aren't exactly remember for taking up arms against the guy while he was still alive.
I point this out because the text for when you become Hegemon directly mentions both of them and how your legacy shall surpass theirs.
- 5
If that was the case, wouldn't it have been addressed in a hotfix already? I imagine an oversight like this would be easy to spot and easy to fix.
- 1
- 1
I'm pretty sure they adressed the things which provoked the most outrage immediately. This is not the most gamebreaking, and it also took some time to notice it because it requires to be lategame and to play a serious campaign.
Hence why subject's liberty desire increases if your army gets wiped and their relative strength to you increases.
But this is not what happened:
Sicily: "Hey, Napoleon."
Napoleon: "Oui?"
Sicily: "You have the strongest army in the world."
Napoleon: "Oui."
Sicily: "Fu*k you."
- 9
- 5
- 1
We are playing a game where the AI keeps building coastal forts in every single province and declares wars while 16 000 gold in debt. No, it wouldn't be already fixed.
- 1
It's probably a waste of money to playtest anything after 1650. Likely OP is the first player to reach that far since the release of 1.30
- 6
- 1
There's diminishing returns the later into the game you get, but the more there is the more will play later, especially if we get less free things and more things that give AEIt's probably a waste of money to playtest anything after 1650. Likely OP is the first player to reach that far since the release of 1.30
The only reason I've not gotten that far yet is because all the other bugs keep making me abandon runsIt's probably a waste of money to playtest anything after 1650. Likely OP is the first player to reach that far since the release of 1.30
i find that the worst part about this are any newly enforced PUs. The opinion malus makes it that much harder to get their opinion above 0 by the time your king dies.
- 3
The thing is, even if you wanted, you usually can't ignore vassals as a hegemony, thanks to colonial nations. Really fun when they all start at - 100 when they form.
- 1
- 1