Visual Representation of Policies 1.26 - Dharma

[RadioRes]

I wanted a visual representation of the new policies and the wiki hasn't been updated yet. So I decided to make my own!

You can download the high res version from this link

EDIT: Fixed couple of mistakes! Thanks for the feedback

EDIT: Fixed couple more mistakes.

 

[Dakka]

Excellent work. Hopefully it actually gets put into said wiki

 

[LetaBot]

Economics + Quality was 5% discipline in 1.25 as well right? Unless I am seeing it wrong it looks bold.

 

[Dakka]

Economics + Quality was 5% discipline in 1.25 as well right? Unless I am seeing it wrong it looks bold.

If I remember correctly, I think economics and quality is actually currently infantry combat ability. But I may be wrong

 

[klingonadmiral]

Economics + Quality was 5% discipline in 1.25 as well right? Unless I am seeing it wrong it looks bold.

Was changed from an Admin Policy to a Mil Policy

 

[Bayes]

Wow - 0.05 war exhaustion and +1 dip rep from quality and diplomatic looks really good.

 

[Ironside121]

You’re a god among men my friend, I couldn’t be bothered reading it all in the diary on my cell phone, this is much more user friendly for me.

Thank you

 

[Insigna]

Wow nice work!

 

[AnssiA]

Thanks, it is nice. The bolding, however, doesn't really come across.

 

[Willem IV]

I see a few differences with the chart posted yesterday on twitter by paradox: https://twitter.com/e_universalis/status/1037271161791557632?s=21

 

[Cookiepie]

Humanist+defensive is missing the change to -0.05 war exhaustion over army recover morale speed (assuming the numbers are based off: https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/foru...evelopment-diary-28th-of-august-2018.1116108/ ). Offensive+diplomatic is incorrect as well afaik. Off to work, but will look at it a bit more later. Greatly appreciate the work though!

 

[PhoenixG]

well all I can say is RIP vassal annex cost.

 

[Less2]

Why wouldn't you continue into the 4th corner? It's annoying e.g. if you want to look at all of the Quality policies and first need to go across the bottom then down the right side.

Standard practice with these combination charts is to have both axes have the same group order and simply blank out the dupes on the diagonal.

 

[PhoenixG]

Why wouldn't you continue into the 4th corner? It's annoying e.g. if you want to look at all of the Quality policies and first need to go across the bottom then down the right side.

Standard practice with these combination charts is to have both axes have the same group order and simply blank out the dupes on the diagonal.

Only works when there is 2 things to combine. But with 3 things it's a bit harder.

 

[Less2]

Only works when there is 2 things to combine. But with 3 things it's a bit harder.

How's there 3 things to combine? Unless something's drastically changed I think policies are still combinations of 2 idea groups. The adm/dip/mil coloring isn't important to the layout.

EDIT: In case I'm not clear, what you'd basically do is mirror the whole thing so instead of
**
*x

You'd have
**x
*x*
x**

 

[PhoenixG]

How's there 3 things to combine? Unless something's drastically changed I think policies are still combinations of 2 idea groups. The adm/dip/mil coloring isn't important to the layout.

EDIT: In case I'm not clear, what you'd basically do is mirror the whole thing so instead of
**
*x

You'd have
**x
*x*
x**

You will only bloat it up while only adding more duplicate stuff.

    adm dip mil
adm  x   1   2
dip  1   x   3
mil  2   3   x

Everything with the same number is duplicate

 

[Less2]

What's the problem with duplicate, file size too big? Is this the 1990s?

The point is that if you want to see all the policies for one group you can look down one row or column, rather than needing to find the idea group twice. You can do this right now with groups like Administrative but not groups like Quality, the former is much easier to scan for something intersting.

 

[pdstanbridge]

Saved to desktop, thanks

 

[ForVictory]

The bonuses are so puny. They hardly make a difference in game.

 

[blusarge27]

well all I can say is RIP vassal annex cost.

This is indeed sad, especially now that we'll probably need to use vassals more in order to convert land.

I see there's colonial growth and settler chance, and also now +X settlers, anyone know what that does?