Will Canada have an option to retain their flag? There was much debate about replacing the Red Ensign.
- 1
MANCHUKUO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (and possible focus tree!)
Please limit AI discussions to the specific topics discussed in OP. There will be more "mini DD's" about the AI in the coming days, covering other points.
And yes, this is a great Dev Diary. For natural reasons we can't put out DD's like this every week. Would you rather that we kept quiet and posted something like this once a month instead?
I'll try as best I can.I am confused how the AA changes actually work, so I have a few queston I hhope someone can answer:
I expect AA will (as it does now) shoot down a few attacking planes. Not many - AA really didn't get that many, proportionately - but a few. Plus it will reduce the effects of air superiority - which was the main reason AA was boosted in Axis divisions later in the war IRL.1. Does AA (including state AA) actually shoot down planes, like physically? Or does it only reduce the air superiority bonus and other stats?
It covers the division only, so you can't have AA divisions as a surrogate for province AA, unfortunately (devs have clarified this).2. Does it only reduce the air superiority in combat or also in the state?
No, because of the comments made above - the AA value affects only the division, not the province/state or nearby troops. Think of it as "light AA"; it might be really cool some day to get "heavy AA" batallions that cover the whole province/state they are in.3. Are you able to do full AA divions, place them behind your frontline and so provide AA defence to the entire state, not just the provinve?
Agree 100%Would you rather that we kept quiet and posted something like this once a month instead?
Generalgouvernement Polen I would guess.Anybody know what Poland's name might have been in the first cosmetic tag picture (the one with Reichskommisariat Ostland)? It ends with "nt Polen" but that's all I can tell from the image.
What's new?New Zealand will share Australias I'm afraid.
National Socialist Germany would never use 'Generalgouvernement Polen' as they wanted to erase Poland, the name, from the map so just Generalgouvernement. Either there should be special &/or unique statuses for the Generalgouvernement and Böhmen und Mähren as they had no security forces of their own (unlike many of the other occupied Eastern territories) or continue as occupied territories. The new mechanic is great, but they should not go overboard using it.Generalgouvernement Polen I would guess.
National Socialist Germany would never use 'Generalgouvernement Polen' as they wanted to erase Poland, the name, from the map so just Generalgouvernement. Either there should be special &/or unique statuses for the Generalgouvernement and Böhmen und Mähren as they had no security forces of their own (unlike many of the other occupied Eastern territories) or continue as occupied territories. The new mechanic is great, but they should not go overboard using it.
That was the point of the name.There is also the fact that just "Generalgouvernement" is really non-indicative and wouldn't really make it clear what is referred to.
That was the point of the name.
If Polen needs to be used then make it a Reichskommissariat. Using both Generalgouvernement & Polen in the same name is like 'Kingdom of Hungary SSR' either it is a kingdom or a SSR, not both. The point was it was a General (non-specific) government area/region/whatever. It was the only General government Nazi Germany had.
Will the addition of cosmetic tags (the automatic ones, like TAG-puppet ones, rather than event driven) alter the checksum?