It is strange to hear the leader of the DDA, forefront of the radical-liberal fringe, defend the status quo on the basis of "that's the way we've always done it". Maybe he's mistakenly picked up a Conservative's prepared speech instead?
Just because the last few governments have taken a hands-off lassez-faire approach to economics does not mean that that approach is the only way, or even a particularly good way. The German Republic may not practice nationalised food handouts at present, but the Roman Republic did - the proverbial panem et circenses - and managed perfectly well, and built an empire on such a system.
And furthermore, I do not concede that a centrally-organised healthcare system would be "a good deal less efficient" than our present mess of a Free Market healthcare system. Quite the reverse, in fact. In the current system, we see countless man-hours burnt away on marketing, advertising, redundant production, trade-secret research, and pointless competition. All of this inefficiency could be done away with completely, if only our healthcare system was built around cooperation and centrally-planned organisation, rather than competition and short-term money-grabbing.
I therefore support the proposed healthcare legislation, and will also be supporting iterative increases in its funding and scope over the next few years.