In the later start dates, some rulers in Persia are Turk, and some are Turkman. What is the differentiation?
Turkmen represent Persianized, sedentary Turks, while Turks represent the more nomadic ones.In the later start dates, some rulers in Persia are Turk, and some are Turkman. What is the differentiation?
Is Karen supposed to start as Parsi? I thought non-Islamic Persians were supposed to be represented as Parsig.
that is correct. My fault which should be fixed.Is Karen supposed to start as Parsi? I thought non-Islamic Persians were supposed to be represented as Parsig.
that is correct. My fault which should be fixed.
Actually I think Turk is supposed to represent later Anatolian Turks. The Oghuz represents the wholly nomadic Turks.Turkmen represent Persianized, sedentary Turks, while Turks represent the more nomadic ones.
Actually I think Turk is supposed to represent later Anatolian Turks. The Oghuz represents the wholly nomadic Turks.
Actually I think Turk is supposed to represent later Anatolian Turks. The Oghuz represents the wholly nomadic Turks.
Question: Has the Eastern Expansion been finished and integrated? I think it has, but I don't see the Syrians and Copts culture which was mentioned in one of the Dev Diaries.
From what I understand most of the dev diaries have been included in the current build however some of the later dev diaries were post-release dev diaries (An in the works dev diary for a future release of the build). So that may be why you are not seeing some of the dev diaries implemented in the current build.
That's from a West African GHW. Stupid vanilla "feature"...Hausaland in India? now I’ve seen everything.
Do you think it would be worthwhile to add a Saxon-Norse hybrid culture in England?
IMHO, there should be a post Viking invasion melting pot, a lot of the names and aristocratic families in England in 1066 had significant ties to Denmark. Ideally, we'd have an original Anglo-Saxon culture, an Anglo-Danish culture and then English (Anglo-Norman).