Cult of Hayek and Enewald never really got along, it seemed like.
Indeed. Getting along would be socialist, and would deprive the consumer of "choice."
Cult of Hayek and Enewald never really got along, it seemed like.
So Enewald confesses to being an irrational socialist then? Good, you've saved yourself from the perils of our painful instruments of torture, such as the dreaded comfy chair.
You really don't want to stop with this, do you? I think you already won, leave it alone for God sakes.Indeed. Getting along would be socialist, and would deprive the consumer of "choice."
You really don't want to stop with this, do you? I think you already won, leave it alone for God sakes.
Also, Densley, what EXACTLY is this you want to see there? Whiggish Pantheon, what colours and where?
But Enewaldism and the Cult of Hayek are identical! (also, it's either "Powellites" or "Powellism" )
Hayek is slightly more towards interventionism, whereas I propose no interventionism at all.
We are far from identical.
Funny thing is, Mises more or less accused Hayek of socialism. :rofl:
During the first Mont Pelerin society meeting, he called present other free market economists who were tolerating some state interventionism as 'bunch of socialists'. :laugh:
It's all the same crap to us normal people though.
I think the poor social-anarchist would not feel safe in that terrible room. ...And everyone else would militantly disagree with you and scream that only THEY are the true communist.That is the same as putting a Marxists, Bolshevik, Menshevik, Leninist, Trotskyist, Social-Anarchist, Stalinist and a Maoist into the same room and calling them all communists!
A fine choice. Though I never thought I'd see the day when you and I were in the same party!
((Yup. Also, there's a constant party there with blackjack and hookers.))
So here's the reason I asked about the colour of Enewaldism earlier.
"Political movements in post-war Britannia 0.5"
I'm wide open to any suggestions about ANYTHING.
It is essentially Grimondite Liberalism, but we need some orange, blue, white and buff on there!
But Enewaldism and the Cult of Hayek are identical! (also, it's either "Powellites" or "Powellism" )
You really don't want to stop with this, do you? I think you already won, leave it alone for God sakes.
Hayek is slightly more towards interventionism, whereas I propose no interventionism at all.
We are far from identical.
Funny thing is, Mises more or less accused Hayek of socialism. :rofl:
During the first Mont Pelerin society meeting, he called present other free market economists who were tolerating some state interventionism as 'bunch of socialists'. :laugh:
"Political Movements, 0.6"
Also, Densley, what EXACTLY is this you want to see there? Whiggish Pantheon, what colours and where?
The Vote Switcher, the Villain of the Modern AgeAnd what is "the vite switcher"?
((I aim to please ))ps: Really liked Contra's new diagram and will add it to the contents!
ps: Really liked Contra's new diagram and will add it to the contents!