((When's the window for party policy changes?))
((Officially, between the posting of the 1839 update and the 1840 election. No reason you can't start discussing it now, behind the scenes, though.))
((When's the window for party policy changes?))
DDR Gotha As I stated earlier, I am no soldier. I am a historian, a philosopher and more recently an educator. For that reason I must trust my nephew's opinion over my own thoughts on the matter. I hope you understand my reasoning. In this case I will trust my nephew. If it goes as poorly as I fear it might, he will lose that trust.
Maximillian
My nephew is Hugo Unger, Oberst of Dragoons in Third Army.
Official polling:
About 50% of the possible voters (245 total votes) have voted in the assembly. 185 vote in favor, 60 against. That's 76% of the total vote, which more than satisfies the simple majority requirement. It's possible the DOW could still fail in the Assembly, but highly unlikely.
Much closer in the Conclave: of the 80 votes already cast, 45 are for the war and 35 are against it. That's a margin of 57% -- healthy, but depending on the votes of the four remaining Stadtholders (the Alliance votes matter, incidentally, as it is potentially possible for there to be a fifty-fifty split, which means defeat) that could change.
It would take a monumental shift to kill the DOW in the Assembly. It's possible, but barely.
(( Okay, poked at the save a bit. Have some ideas. But remind we which idea it is you use to reabsorb England. ))
((It's not the very latest, but the difference between the saves is I moved the generals around in the most recent one. If it's necessary, let me know and I'll post it.
I've been using the console -- event 60120 ENL -- to reabsorb England. The weird thing is that it took for Scotland -- no problems there -- but not England.))
(( There will be some edits to the save when I'm done, so the latest would be good. Also, what's the range of acceptable results? Adjusting cores is probably the easiest solution, but turning colonial states to full states the most likely to keep their Empire fully together. Thing is, if I do that, they'll be unlikely to ever release the overseas holdings as part of the game. Maybe if I make UK England and overseas England different nations? ))
This is important enough to take to a poll.
1) We accept that if we wish the British Empire to be smaller we, ah, encourage it ourselves. (That is, England is fully absorbed, with full colony-> states.)
2) We create the USA out of the English provinces in North America. (I guess California would be a better choice geographically, but the USA is more interesting from a gameplay perspective.) We should also strip their meaningless cores on Newfoundland in this scenario.
Other suggestions are welcomed! 1 vote, 1 person. (The save will be posted in a few seconds.)
This is important enough to take to a poll.
1) We accept that if we wish the British Empire to be smaller we, ah, encourage it ourselves. (That is, England is fully absorbed, with full colony-> states.)
2) We create the USA out of the English provinces in North America. (I guess California would be a better choice geographically, but the USA is more interesting from a gameplay perspective.) We should also strip their meaningless cores on Newfoundland in this scenario.
Other suggestions are welcomed! 1 vote, 1 person. (The save will be posted in a few seconds.)