• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Imperator Dev Diary 07/12/20

Greetings all,

Today, we’ll be covering some additional mechanics coming in the Marius update, before we take a look at further mission trees coming as part of the Heirs of Alexander DLC.

Ports

As the astute amongst you have noticed, we’ve made several references to ‘upgrading’ port infrastructure in recent dev diaries and streams.

Prior to Marius, ports were seeded in numerous historical locations, but could never be altered, removed, or added during gameplay. As Imperator is a game where the ability to build your own civilization is paramount, it seemed natural that this behaviour should be reconsidered.

As part of Marius, shipyards will be a constructible building-type, which along with various local effects, will increase the port level of the territory in which they are built.

pasted image 0.png


Shipyards can be constructed in any coastally adjacent territory, which will have the graphical effect of creating a culturally appropriate port model in the coastal territory. For technical and design reasons, we’ve chosen not to allow the construction of shipyards in river provinces, unless there was a pre-seeded port already present (Pataliputra or Sais, for example).

The level of port in a territory will primarily dictate which ships it is able to construct; low level ports may only build and repair Light ships, for example.

Mega-polyremes will require a port level of 5, but are still gated behind the corresponding military tradition, though due to the tradition tree rework, this unlock can now be attained by any nation willing to invest into the traditions of the Greek Kingdoms.

You’ll be able to distinguish between port levels by map icon; two such examples at the beginning of the game are the port in Alexandria which begins at a higher level than surrounding territories:

pasted image 0 (1).png


Lastly, but not least - ports can now be removed or destroyed by removing shipyard buildings in the associated territory.This will evict any mercenary navies currently present, and destroy the port model.

Technology Feedback

Your response to the technology trees coming in 2.0 was overwhelming, and I feel we’re on an good course with these. This said, there was some excellent critique on the system, some of which we’ve had a chance to iterate on.

pasted image 0 (2).png


One of the most common opinions we saw, was that the tech tree background appeared bland. To address this, our talented artists have added a diagrammatic background (replete with authentic wine stains) to give some identity to the game view.

One additional and enduring piece of feedback we’ve had during testing, was the lack of contextual identification for inventions in the new system - how does the player know what each invention represents, and how can they easily locate what they’re aiming for in our larger tree structures?

We’ve added two ways to mitigate this concern.

Firstly, inventions now display their foremost modifier icon inside the UI element. This gives an at-a-glance indication of what you’re likely to receive once an invention is purchased. As our regular players will know, however, there are a significant number of modifiers and modifier types in Imperator - it can be tricky to mentally map all of these. Which leads us to the second improvement.

The search bar in the top right corner will highlight inventions that correspond to your search terms. This will parse both names and modifier strings:

pasted image 0 (3).png


(It goes without saying hopefully, that this highlight is WIP!)

In addition to these UI changes, some incidental balance changes have been made to the inventions system. Notably, while we do not wish for it to be possible to unlock all inventions in a single playthrough, the number available vs the number of innovations available were simply too far removed.

To mitigate this, we’ve decreased the expected years per technology from 20 years to 15 years - this reduces the ahead of time penalty accordingly, and should result in more frequent tech advances as time goes on.

Several modifiers previously tied to nation rank (particularly diplomatic relations) have been moved out of their associated rank modifier, and into the tech trees. I’ve never been entirely happy with the number of alliances and relations that were available from the beginning of the game - this addresses that concern, yet retains the ability to focus on this as a valid playstyle for players and AI, should their situation demand it.

pasted image 0 (4).png


As the above screenshot suggests, we have also added more keystone inventions, particularly those which might alter the playstyle of a nation. The wargoal referred to here is the one mentioned in our previous developer diary. Whilst powerful, it sits relatively far down the Oratory tree, as many of our more game-changing inventions tend to.

Before I hand over to @Bratyn, I'm aware that I promised unit model screenshots a week or two ago - due to some final polish on these, I can't show them off just yet - watch this space!

---------------
 
  • 125Like
  • 60Love
  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
Reactions:
Play multiplayer and it is almost guaranteed

It even happens regularly to me in SP. Maurya nearly always, Persia often formes and even Rome can easily pass 500 territories after the last adjustment to its aggressiveness.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
Agree, imo this matter needs more consideration, important ports grew because they were located in strategic, global zones.
Carthage was in the middle of the mediterranean, Ostia serviced Rome, Aquileia grew because its position in the upper adriatic made it possible to unload goods in the middle of europe, Byzantium etc etc...

For these reasons the matter should be addressed in the trade and economy update imho, maybe someone could do a post in the senatuspopulusque thread.

I have made a suggestion on the SPQR about ports above level 2 being used as trade hubs. This will allow for trade bonuses by protecting long-haul trade, blockades negating those bonuses and cosmetic trade lines rerouting. It is all explained here:

 
Last edited:
  • 2Like
Reactions:
i think it would be cool if there would come a Balkan culture group, which would include Thracian, Illyrian, Pannonian and Dacian. with Thracian i don't mean the kingdom of thrace cause thats a hellenic kingdom ruling over a primarily Thracian population, but like nations like odryssia, and triballi. adding more culture groups would be cool like Iberian, Celtic, Germanic instead of a generic Barbarian culture groups. love this dev diary tho
 
  • 4
  • 1
Reactions:
i think it would be cool if there would come a Balkan culture group, which would include Thracian, Illyrian, Pannonian and Dacian. with Thracian i don't mean the kingdom of thrace cause thats a hellenic kingdom ruling over a primarily Thracian population, but like nations like odryssia, and triballi. adding more culture groups would be cool like Iberian, Celtic, Germanic instead of a generic Barbarian culture groups. love this dev diary tho
Iberian, Celtic, Germani culture groups exist, what are you talking about? Balkan culture group is a bad idea.
 
  • 5
Reactions:
I'm usually not interested too much in mission trees, but this one seems awesome! I'll definitely want to play Thrace in the next update, and I can definitely see some hoi4 influence on the mechanics!
 
  • 1
Reactions: