• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

EUIV - Development Diary - 10th of March 2020

Hey! Today we’ll be covering Estates which have been getting a huge overhaul in the 1.30. The mechanic as a whole has gotten a rethink from the ground up on how we wanted the player to relate to the mechanic.

So here are some of the goals that we have been aiming for as we worked on the Estates the past year.
  • Estates are something you build, not something you exploit
  • Give and Take sort of relationship between Estate & Crown
  • Large benefit early, a dead weight when Absolutism comes
  • Better integration with other parts of the game
  • Better feedback loop for the player in using it and less red numbers.
So the last part is a bit abstract but we’ll get to what we mean when we say that. So let’s get to the actual changes that we’ve done.

upload_2020-3-10_9-25-24.png


There’s a lot going on here, the interface looks nothing like it did before. So let’s get started with the top part which concerns the ownership of land in your realm. Estates no longer own land on a province to province basis but instead have a share of the development of your country.

upload_2020-3-10_9-25-34.png


The land share that the estates have will affect their loyalty and their influence. This land share fluctuates up and down as the country gains development and from some new interactions that are now available. But first besides the estates, the crown also controls some of that development directly. Depending on this control there will be different benefits or penalties depending on if the crown is relatively weak or not to the Estates.

This control of land is mainly affected by these ways:
  • When gaining development like through conquering land each estate will gain land relative to their influence compared to the rest of the estates. The crown's influence is calculated as a base of 50% +absolutism.
  • Developing provinces gives a little bit of control to the crown
  • Events will change the ratio of land that estates share
  • Crown Land interactions will let you manipulate as well.
So why would you want to control a lot of land as the crown? Well for one you are keeping the estates in check, if one estate gets ahead their influence will also rise prompting them to potentially coup you. But there are also modifiers that are applied at different levels. The idea being that if the crown itself is weak, the estates will exploit that.

The bonuses/penalties applied depending on your crown land is done so in steps. You want to hold yourself at 20% or higher crown land as below these modifiers are applied with increasing strength. At 0% land you are in quite a pickle with these penalties:.
  • -50 Max Absolutism
  • +0.2 Global Autonomy
  • +1.5 LD from Subject Dev
  • -20% Tax Modifier
Though when you hit a really low amount of crown land, the estates will be willing to bail you out in exchange for you giving them a really harsh privilege. Which we’ll cover later in the diary.

At the other end, we have at 50% and higher you start to get benefits for being in tighter control over your country. At 100% you get
  • +15 Max Absolutism
  • +1 Yearly Absolutism
  • +20% Tax Modifier
  • -0.05 Global Autonomy
I mentioned earlier that the land share could be manipulated by Crown Land Interactions. There’s three of them. Sales of Titles, Seize Land and Summon the Diet. The first two as you can guess will let you either sell off land to the estates or seize land forcefully from them. Sale of Titles besides giving away 10% of your land to the estates, it will also give you money relative to how rich the estates are and give them 10% Loyalty. Seize Land will of course lower your estate's loyalty by 20%, but take 5% back for yourself. If the estate is disloyal it will spawn rebels and every province the rebels siege down will take back land to the estate based on the province development.

Summon the Diet is a bit different. It’s a good tool to keep the Estates happy. Upon using this interaction you instantly get 5% Loyalty to all Estates but also give them 10% Influence. Then each estate will propose an Agenda for you to pick between, each asking for something from you.

upload_2020-3-10_9-26-0.png


upload_2020-3-10_9-26-8.png


Most of the time these will be very simple things but fitting for that estate. For instance the Burghers might ask you to increase production in a province, Clergy might want you to build a Church and so on. Upon finishing Agenda for a specific estate you will also gain more loyalty with specifically them.

This should all be very reminiscent of the old mission system, giving you small bonuses and rewards for simple tasks you can complete quite quickly. Though keep in mind, each time you summon the Diet the estates stack the 10% Influence. Though there is a privilege you can grant the nobles where you empower them to dictate the Agenda of the Crown themselves bypassing that issue. A lot of these agendas have been made, both Generic ones and more advanced Estate specific ones.

Next is the Estate Privileges. The old interactions system is removed as we are moving away from the purpose of Estates being something you squeeze every 20 year for money and mana. Privileges is something you grant to the Estates, to get something out of them, but it usually also means they take something away from you. All Privileges also reduces the max absolutism of the country.

upload_2020-3-10_9-26-21.png


Privileges after granted can only be removed if you have higher loyalty with the Estate than their influence is. When removed their loyalty will reset to 0. Some privileges will remove themselves after certain conditions are fulfilled.

All of the old interactions have in one way or form been translated into the new privilege system, but in a way that fits with something that are not one time bonuses but intended to be longer term. For instance instead of getting +50/100/150 monarch points of your choice, you can now get +1 to your monarch power generation by giving a privilege to the relevant estate. However in exchange they will take 10% of your Crown land. And with how the balance is at start, it means you might only be able to get that privilege for one of the estate, and not all three, unless you are willing to compromise on realm stability.

There’s also unique for nations, for instance Poland starts with the Golden Liberty which grants the Nobility unchecked power. This entire rework will be part of the base game and most of these privileges will be free. But there will also be some unique fun ones that are locked to the Emperor DLC,like various Monopolies on trade goods you can give to Estates which gives you the total production income of 8 years for that trade good in your nation up front.
upload_2020-3-10_9-26-36.png

upload_2020-3-10_9-26-53.png


Most privileges besides their big effects will also usually manipulate the Loyalty, Influence, Crown Land or Absolutism of the country.

Part of moving towards this Privilege system and away from the one time benefit interactions from before, is that we want you to build with the Estates. For instance there are privileges that increase your Governing Capacity. You will as well have it easier to play around with Estate Loyalty as how that is calculated have been redone as part of adding the Privilege system.

There are now proper modifiers for Estate Loyalty and Influence, which might not tell you much if you don’t mod the game. What we have done is that we have separated out so that as a player you can manipulate the equilibrium that the Loyalty is moving towards. In one time effects like the Seize Land/Sale of Titles it still instant change of the Loyalty value of the estate. But this change where you manipulate the equilibrium have been integrated into a lot more mechanics, not only the Privileges, giving you a better opportunity to keep estates happy over a longer time than “just long enough to press this button”.

upload_2020-3-10_9-27-8.png


So in summary what have we changed. Well for one loyalty is not a currency in the way it was before, now you interact with estates when you want to tweak something. Loyalty and Influence of estates is an ever present value that you can see being affected in a lot of different interfaces now. Loyalty will be a lot clearer now on where it will end up if you let time pass, and you can build your country in such a way that an estate will naturally be happy with you. What this means is that it can be less of an exploitative relationship with the Estates and more a mutual one which gives a way better feedback loop to the player that he is not doing something bad.

But even so the Estates are still a double edged sword if you do not take care. Several of the players for the Dev Clash as they were testing things out accidentally ended up creating a state where the King was but a puppet of the Estates.

upload_2020-3-10_9-40-26.png


As usual we’ll be in the thread and answer any questions you might have. Next week we will be talking about Papal and Italian content that is coming with Emperor.
 
Last edited:
  • 4Like
Reactions:
Eh, its not Western Europe's estates. It's mostly Frankish Realm estates. So these changes mostly reflect areas like France & the HRE.

Britain was different in a few ways, like Scotland and Ireland generally having Clans and England a Parliament with things like Magna Carta and serfdom being abolished just a few decades before 1444.
Scandinavian countries do not have Free Peasantry and neither do nations such as Dithmarschen, Friesland and even in the rest of the Netherlands. While there was a lack of real nobility with an emphasis on Burghers and Free Peasants. And states like Burgundy, Habsburg Austria and Spain chose governers to rule over parts of the land.
The Knighthood in Holland/Zeeland did get primacy; not the great magnates France had, maybe, but still the nobility acting as one (of course not against the serfs but against the Burghers who would tlak back, so there's something to be said for having free peasants too).
 
It is great that devs tried to create western Europe's estate system which feels historical. How about Russian's principalities which are after Ivan the terrible which act like an autocrat? Peter the Great did not have a diet, he just forces the peasants to crate St.Petersberg. How about the age of Absolutism which many monarchs have an absolute say on everything. How about iqta which according to khanacademy.org "The government either collected taxes from civilians and issued a regular salary to the troops or paid the military through land grants."
How about the land granted that royal cannot collect tax like the church or mosque?

I am not all that familiar with how islamic societies were structured but Eastern Europe including Russia had a really similar power dinamic like in the West. By the way, the Kniaz of Muscovy Ivan the III in 1444 is not Ivan the Terrible (who was the 4th). Before Ivan the boyars (aka nobility) owned a big part of the land and Muscovy's rulers had to litterally buy that land to centralize the control or like Ivan the Terrible did, just seize it violently. The clergy is the same story. They were touched by centralization in Russia only when Peter the I came to power and his successors continued it. Peter however did one major thing, he did not apoint a Patriarch and made the Synod the upper body. He decapitated the clergy and this made them loose a lot of power. All of this would be supper good flavour content to be added to the new estates system, with unique interactions based on religion, culture, etc. For example, the annulment of the patriarch position could give you a big debuff to clergy loyalty, power, equilibrium, but also remove a big part of their influence, land under control and who knows, maybe even absolutism or max absolutism. An interesting idea would be to make Patriarch Authority also give the clergy estate power proportionaly and by removing the patriarch this specific modifier will be removed, thus representing the monarchs control over the clergy.
 
View attachment 552309

There’s a lot going on here, the interface looks nothing like it did before. So let’s get started with the top part which concerns the ownership of land in your realm. Estates no longer own land on a province to province basis but instead have a share of the development of your country.

It seems my question went under the radar so I'll repeat it: how does this new take on Estates will affect this event chain?
 
Everybody could thought Golden Liberty was great thing, but it was one of reason of downfall of Commonwealth with Nihil Novi. Nobles had a lot power and King could not take steps too reform the Country. I am thinking about give 0,2 legitamacy or 0,1 corruption as downgrade of good bonuses of Golden Liberty.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
How will this system interact with Parliaments? Will having a Parliament still disable the Nobility? Will England still have no Nobility Estate? If so that's kind of a bummer, seems like a really interesting feature especially since privileges could now afford some kind of control over the Ruler by Estates in a way that makes constitutional monarchies feel more "constitutional".

Also, an Estate for Peasants in countries like Dithmarschen would be amazing, and also make the Estate system for them seem less wonky, unless the "State" itself is meant to embody the Peasants, which feels kinda strange but I guess would make sense.
 
Last edited:
  • 1Like
Reactions:
It would be cool ir You unlocked banners (of your culture) if You conqure manchita as a mongol culture nation cause damn they need the económic help as much as possible, possibly remaking it SO You can steer trade esiar then it flowing naturally to Europa more of a loop then just end nodes
 
It would be cool ir You unlocked banners (of your culture) if You conqure manchita as a mongol culture nation cause damn they need the económic help as much as possible, possibly remaking it SO You can steer trade esiar then it flowing naturally to Europa more of a loop then just end nodes


Edit, to make asían economies actually possible
 
When it is said that Sale of Titles gives away 10% of the Crown Land, does it mean a plain 10%, or 10% of what I have? Suppose I have 30% Crown Land. I sell titles. Will my Crown Land get reduced 10%, or 3%? So will I end with 20%, or 27% Crown Land?
 
Last edited:
@nextLVL, thank you for a explatation.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_the_Terrible
Thanks for explaining how the synod governance works.
I agree with you that 1444 muscovy was still co-dependepent state of affairs.
It is true that after the fall of Kiev Rus due to the Mongol invasion. Rus kingdoms are started the centrolization all over.
On 16 January 1547, at age sixteen, Ivan was crowned with Monomakh's Cap at the Cathedral of the Dormition.
On 3 December 1564, Ivan departed Moscow for Aleksandrova Sloboda. From there he sent two letters in which he announced his abdication because of the alleged embezzlement and treason of the aristocracy and clergy.
The Boyar Council ruled the zemshchina ('land'), the second division of the state. Ivan also recruited a personal guard known as the Oprichniki. [when I talk about worldy absolute power, I refer here.]
It is true that both muscovy aristocrats and royal families repected the otherdox clergies.[sometimes]

In 1575, Ivan once again pretended to resign from his title and proclaimed Simeon Bekbulatovich, his statesman of Tatar origin, the new Tsar. Simeon reigned as a figurehead leader for a year. According to English envoy Giles Fletcher, the Elder, under Ivan's instructions Simeon confiscated all of the lands that belonged to monasteries, while Ivan pretended to disagree with the decision. When the throne was returned to Ivan in 1576, he returned some of the confiscated land, keeping the rest.

Is those facts true? I am not sure.
 
@nextLVL, thank you for a explatation.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_the_Terrible
Thanks for explaining how the synod governance works.
I agree with you that 1444 muscovy was still co-dependepent state of affairs.
It is true that after the fall of Kiev Rus due to the Mongol invasion. Rus kingdoms are started the centrolization all over.
On 16 January 1547, at age sixteen, Ivan was crowned with Monomakh's Cap at the Cathedral of the Dormition.
On 3 December 1564, Ivan departed Moscow for Aleksandrova Sloboda. From there he sent two letters in which he announced his abdication because of the alleged embezzlement and treason of the aristocracy and clergy.
The Boyar Council ruled the zemshchina ('land'), the second division of the state. Ivan also recruited a personal guard known as the Oprichniki. [when I talk about worldy absolute power, I refer here.]
It is true that both muscovy aristocrats and royal families repected the otherdox clergies.[sometimes]

In 1575, Ivan once again pretended to resign from his title and proclaimed Simeon Bekbulatovich, his statesman of Tatar origin, the new Tsar. Simeon reigned as a figurehead leader for a year. According to English envoy Giles Fletcher, the Elder, under Ivan's instructions Simeon confiscated all of the lands that belonged to monasteries, while Ivan pretended to disagree with the decision. When the throne was returned to Ivan in 1576, he returned some of the confiscated land, keeping the rest.

Is those facts true? I am not sure.
Most likely to be true. Ivan IV was quite an interesting character.
One, that boyars and clergy wanted to never have on the throne again :D
 
If there won't be anymore estate-bound provinces, that means the 25% minimum autonomy from estate owned provinces is out. That means the average minimum autonomy for the whole country will be generally lower. Perhaps even 0%. Won't that affect government progress scoring? Since it's scaled up with autonomy... Will you guys fix it, so we won't be able to reform our govt so quickly?
 
If there won't be anymore estate-bound provinces, that means the 25% minimum autonomy from estate owned provinces is out. That means the average minimum autonomy for the whole country will be generally lower. Perhaps even 0%. Won't that affect government progress scoring? Since it's scaled up with autonomy... Will you guys fix it, so we won't be able to reform our govt so quickly?
I think the answer would be more government reforms.
Monarchies considerably fewer and less interesting reforms than republics and theocracies.
I was actually surprised that in the European DLC most government reforms actually affected the ROTW with the exception of theocracies and a couple of unique reforms.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
The crown's influence is calculated as a base of 50% +absolutism.
Should it not rather be that Absolutism is calculated based on the power of the Crown relatively to the other estates ? Or even more logical, based on the number of privileges they do NOT have.
I.e when the king personnally controls 80% of the country dev, and the estates share the 20% remaining, absolutism is 80%.

It seems to me that it was precisely the way it worked in France, for example, when the king reduced the nobles, clergy and protestant burghers influence, by removing their privileges.
While on the contrary, England did not achieve the same level of absolutism, because of its Magna Carta, House of Lords and House of Commons, all of which are privileges given to the nobles and burghers