Hello everyone! Common Sense and 1.12 have been released, and our expansion sales continue to shatter previous records! With the expansion and patch now out, we're going to shift into a different gear with our dev diaries for a while, talking about other things than upcoming features. Some ideas we've had is to discuss our design process, how we handle feedback from fans, and reflections on different parts of the game and where we want to see them go in the future.

Today, however, we're busy working on a hotfix for 1.12, so I thought I'd tell you about that, and also a bit about why there will always be bugs on release of a new expansion.

Let's deal with the hotfix first. From what we've seen, 1.12 has been a smooth launch for the majority of users, with a low bug count in new features, but there were some serious technical issues on certain hardware setups.

The hotfix is expected to be released today or tomorrow, and at present contains fixes for the following issues:

Hotfix 1.12.1 (AS OF WRITING OF THIS POST, THIS IS NOT YET OUT)
- Fixed a bug where the AI would declare suicidal wars due to incorrectly calculating defensive call acceptance
- Spain can no longer form Andalusia and vice versa (preventing endless nation forming loop for prestige)
- Forts can no longer take control of other provinces with forts (capital, mothballed or otherwise)
- Fixed a bug where the AI would accept concede defeat as the only concession even when they had 100% warscore.
- Fixed a bug where single player games started with the 'Only host can save' setting would be unable to be loaded.
- Fixed a bug where some AIs would constantly mothball and unmothball forts (this could cause serious performance hit on lower end machines as well)
- Fixed a bug where the AI would continously march back and forth between two provinces in a fort's ZoC
- Fixed exploit where you could give away ally's provinces even if not occupied in coalition war.
- Fixed a bug where rebels would spawn at very low morale when there were hostile units in their spawn province.
- Fixed an issue with steam workshop removing supported_version from .mod files
- Fixed an issue where .mod files would be printed with garbled data, resulting in CTD on launch
- Fixed an exploit where you could give away the provinces of your war allies even if they were not occupied (you should only be able to give away your own unoccupied provinces)
- Unit movement lock can no longer be bypassed by issuing another move order.
- Fixed artillery models for several different unit packs to have the correct infantry model accompanying it.
- Lowered cost of diplomatic annexation from 10 to 8 dip points per development (since there's more ways to decrease adm cost)
- Autonomy from diploannexation is now 60 (down from 75)
- Fixes issues using the MacBook trackpad when interacting with the map on OSX.
- Fixed a CTD in AI province conquest weight calculation
- Fixed a CTD related to rebels in uncolonized provinces
- Game no longer crashes when forcing nations with subjects to revoke claims.
- Save games saved in 1.12 no longer cause CTDs in 1.11 (only applies to saves made after this hotfix is applied)
- The '+' key should now increase game speed correctly on US/UK keyboards.
- Fixed issue where foreign Separatists defecting to your country caused your country to act as if it was just released.

Note that we are only considering important fixes and tweaks for hotfixes, so if you have a bug you think should be hotfixed, take a moment and ask yourself whether or not it can wait until the larger bugfixing patch that we'll be releasing later in June.


Why do patches always have bugs?
This is a question we get a lot, along with 'Do you even test your games?', and 'Do you even play your own games?'. The answer is, yes, we play our own games, and yes, we test our games. Loosely calculated, about 2400 man-hours of QA has gone into Common Sense, and before a launch every feature is tested thoroughly. Over the course of the development of 1.12 and Common Sense, approximately 1200 bugs have been fixed by the team.

So why, then, do bugs still get into the release? There are two sides to this, and the first one is math.

As of Tuesday night, we had around 20000 concurrent players. If we assume that those 20000 people each play 2 hours that night, that is 40000 hours of play. In order to have equivalent QA test hours to only 2 hours of play on a release night, we would need a team of 30 full-time QA. Scenarios that only happen once every 10000 games will realistically never happen for our QA, and when you factor in that those 20000 players have 20000 different hardware setups... you can begin to see why things like the game not launching on a single core computer (we do not have a single core computer in QA because they haven't been making them for over half a decade) or the engine upgrade breaking mac trackpads (we did not have a mac trackpad in QA, we now do and will use to test future versions) happen.

That's one side of the coin. The other side of the coin is priority.

It's always our ambition to release new expansions without bugs in the new features, and for this reason we consider newly introduced bugs higher priority than older ones. We haven't always done a great job of this in the past, but 1.12/Common Sense had a much lower bug count in new features than previous expansions. There were however, a couple immediately apparent issues, particularly the fact that movement locking did not work at all. You might reasonably ask yourself how such a thing slipped through QA. The answer: It didn't.

The movement locking bug was introduced in the very last build we made for release, as a result of fixing another bug where ZoCs would create weird movement paths. It was only found after the build was done and smoke tested (smoke testing is basically a thorough 'does the game actually run' test that we do on anything we release to the public). Given that we had no other serious known issues at the time, I made the call that the issue was not serious enough to warrant spending another half a day making a new build and testing that build. QA found the issue, I chose not to fix it because the time spent making a new build could be better spent working on our back log of older bugs, and I figured that we'd have to make a hotfix anyway due to the risk for technical issues appearing with the engine upgrade.

The simple fact of it is that we are probably never going to have a launch that doesn't introduce at least one or two serious technical issues, because we do not, and cannot test the game on the thousands and thousands of different hardware configurations that will be playing the game the moment we set the patch live. The measure of a successful launch, in my book, is not that there are no bugs, but rather that there are no serious bugs which could reasonably have been caught by our internal testing.

Do I expect this explanation to change much? Not really, because I think people like easy explanations, and 'Paradox does not even test their expansions' is a much easier explanation than 'In a complex piece of software you will always have some bugs no matter how much QA you do', 'Fixing bugs can introduce new bugs' and 'Not all bugs are worth grinding development to a halt in order to fix'.

Nonetheless, for those who wish to know, there it is.

 

[casius84]

Hotfix won't be coming out today, unfortunately. We'll aim to have it up as soon as it possible tomorrow. One of the issues (related to mods and steam workshop) turned out to be much harder to fix than we thought.

Thank you for the information!Me and couple other XP users will be waiting for this hotfix.Good luck with your work.

 

[jonathan836]

a small question, do I lost my game in 1.12 after this 1.121 hotfix? or will my ironman game in 1.12 could be benefit from this hotfix?

 

[HeshMan96]

I'd like to know why the HYW was removed and why France is no longer the BBB.

 

[zedyue]

Wiz are you aware of the bug involving Burgundy having a Personal Union over Hainaut? Hainaut doesn't exist at the start and when it is force released it often causes a crash.

lowland_alliances.txt

union = {
    first = BUR
    second = HAI
    start_date = 1444.1.1
    end_date = 1477.1.5
}

 

[gogis]

Wiz, do you test patch on low end machines? Because apparently new patch break anisothropic filtering settings which cause plummet in frame rate on old video cards.
Because all hours of functional testing you do may make no sense at all if you leak performance drops and never notice it because your QA use top notch hardware.

 

[winddy]

The bug that I want you to fix the most...
Please fix my alt+21 console command. D':
(Also for some reasons, whenever I load the game or exit to main menu, the game crash and have to start the game again. Could you check it again?)

 

[Elryos]

Not in hotfix, but we're releasing a larger patch later in June that will have +1 diplomat for all rank 2+ countries and +1 free leader for all rank 3+ countries (keep in mind you don't have to have Common Sense to be rank 2).

Great!
But will there also be something for the Monastic Orders? As far as I could see they are locked to Duchy, if you don´t want to change tags.
Maybe something like a trigger: All of the following must be true: be a Monastic Order, Devotion > 80, at war with heretic/infidel; then: +1 free leader?

 

[redeye271]

My game just quits to desktop when trying to make a peace deal

 

[Mef]

Ctrl-alt-c to open console.

Shift-Alt-C

 

[Wizzington]

Shift-Alt-C

Yeah, sorry, late in the working day brainfart.

 

[harvesarmy]

Not in hotfix, but we're releasing a larger patch later in June that will have +1 diplomat for all rank 2+ countries and +1 free leader for all rank 3+ countries (keep in mind you don't have to have Common Sense to be rank 2).

How can you get a country greater than rank 3?

 

[Elryos]

How can you get a country greater than rank 3?

Maybe it´s modable?

Edit: There we go.

 

[harvesarmy]

Through modding, but that was actually just meant to say 3.

Ok, should be cool to get some more bonuses for more developed nations.

 

[BRK]

Nice!

 

[Kitsuka]

@Wiz
What are your severity levels for your bugs? How do you determine what need to be fixed first?

What we use at my work place for a general guideline (and i paraphrase) is the following:

Critical: a key feature is broken, there is no workaround, and it is being seen by the customer.
Major: a key feature is broken, but there is a workaround, and is being seen by the customer.
Minor: a minor cosmetic problem, a minor feature is broken, or other issues that are unseen by customer.

We also assign some priority number to the bug/defect to tell us what order things need to be fixed. As I am sure it is with you, there are many cases where a major defect is more important to fix than a Critical defect because of the number of customers it affects.

I remember it being said on the forum somewhere, at sometime, that "There are no known Major issues at this time". After that being said there was a large push back of people saying how many issues there are. I know the bug classification is mostly a matter of opinion and depends on your perspective(that is being the customer, the guy how need to fix it, or your boss who is telling you to fix it). What do you guys mean wen you say a issue is minor or major?

 

[SolSys]

Is there a thread or a page where we can get details on the engine upgrades?

 

[rebelito]

savegame compatible?

 

[Praetorian44]

I'm glad to see that the issue breaking mods on Steam is fixed.

 

[Tirenedon]

Why are York and Lancaster even in the game? I don't even remember them in EU3.

 

[grommile]

Why are York and Lancaster even in the game? I don't even remember them in EU3.

They've existed as tags since at least EU2.