• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Folks, the Bengal tiger has been out of the bag for a week now, so I think it's time for the first dev diary on Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India! In this first entry, I will just give you a quick overview of what this new expansion to Crusader Kings II is and what it is not. In the weeks to come, I will cover each feature in detail.

First of all, why India? Well, it's always been a long-term goal of mine, and we have gone through the obvious stuff by now. The old eastern edge of the map is suboptimal, both politically and geographically. Many powerful states that interacted with Europe are cut in half, not to mention that the southeastern corner of the map is unhistorically dull. In general, adding India will make the whole Middle East more interesting to play. Most importantly though, India is such a dynamic and fascinating region!

ck2_RoI_dd_01_The_New_East.png

Now, there has been some speculation about how the map will be handled exactly, and the answer is simply that we are extending it far to the east. It's not a separate map or anything like that. This means that everyone who owns the game will be able to interact with, (and conquer!) India, whether they own Rajas of India or not.

In order to extend the map and try keep the wasteland areas to a minimum while at the same time making sure India was big enough, we had to twist the entire eastern part of the old map. While the new map projection is no more realistic per se, we did seize this opportunity to correct some fairly major problems with the old map, especially around the Caspian and Aral seas. The addition of all this new territory also meant we could finally put many provinces in their correct place (we had tended to crowd the eastern edge of the old map with provinces that were actually off map, due to their importance.) Apart from all the new Indian provinces, we have also added provinces in central Siberia, Transoxania and Afghanistan. So far, I think we're at about 330 new provinces, bringing the total count up to 1442 (including all sea zones), and it's likely we'll add some more before we're done.

ck2_RoI_dd_01_Corrected_Caspian.png ck2_RoI_dd_01_Siberia.png

Best of all, none of this will cost you a dime. However, if you wish to play as a Hindu, Buddhist or Jain ruler - with all the associated mechanics, graphics and events - you will have to buy the expansion. You really don't want to miss out on things like reincarnation, holy cows, levitating monks, Thuggees and tiger hunts! Oh, and there will be a unique set of Indian portraits included in Rajas of India.

Can the game really handle all these new characters and provinces without slowing to a crawl? Yes. Actually, memory usage was the bigger issue, but we've comfortably reduced that by more than 300Mb, which allows us to add all the extra characters. We've also optimized the game for speed, but it might end up running a bit slower than before (though it should only be noticeable on speed 5 unless you have an ancient rig.) I should also mention that due to the drastic changes we are making to the game, old save games will not remain compatible with version 2.1! However, version 2.0.4 will remain available as a beta branch on Steam.

That's all for today folks! Peace.

ck2_RoI_dd_01_Indus.png

[video=youtube;TBQmY4TKUrc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBQmY4TKUrc[/video]
 
Last edited:
I am so sad that Tibet is wasteland. Please let players conquer it, for it is the dream of players all over the world, not only the dream of Chinese.

But then there would be bookmarks where only part of a particular Chinese Empire is visible on the map.
 
Will we be able to peek at the de jure map before release? and any new empires being added as well?
Sure, I'll try to add a screenie next time.
Great! I hope Kingdom of Persia won't be too big. Maybe new kingdoms like Kurdistan and Khorasan? Khorasan (maybe name it Parthia, Afghanistan, or Balochistan?) could include new provinces between old Persia and India, while Kurdistan could include Azerbaijan, Gilan, Mosul, and Jazira. Mesopotamian and Persian kingdoms were stretched too much in that direction, and if even Alans and Nubians got dejure kingdoms, why not Kurds?
 
I hope they add Tibet with an East Asian expansion, it wont be playable obviously, but we can conquer it as China.

Why would it obviously not be playable, other than it being part of china for a while?
 
Are all the new provinces in the East or have you added some in e.g. Africa?
Also, are you adding any new features to the existing religions? I imagine that some of the stuff about Jain pacifism could be added to certain heresies.
 
Last edited:
Nobody actually rulled in the HUGE forests of India until quite recently. Except thieves and bandits. And elephants.

...

Does that mean there are elephant rulers? More seriously, how are the "Indian" (geographically speaking) tribes represented?
 
Can't wait to see how Jains will be played given their unique pacifism.
 
When it's realised, someone should make a mini-mod adding the reincarnation events for the Druze.

I especially like the flag of Khazaria in the second screenshot.

That's the flag of the Shia Caliphate....
 
This tiny island near the Horn of Africa is now a separate province - nice touch, Paradox!

I'll probably buy RoI but even without the DLC playing as Miaphysites, Zoros and Muslims will get much more interesting. Actually this region is going to be the most interesting and dynamic one, considering all the invasions (Seljuks, Golden Horde, Ilkhanate, Timurids) and possibily of interacting with Catholics (crusades), Orthodox (ERE and Georgia), Zoroastrians (kinda) and Miaphysties (Abbysinia and Nubia FTW!) and now of course also Indian religions.

This is going to be awesome!

EDIT: Doomdark, could you please tell us something about EU4 converter in regard to RoI? Thank you.
 
Tibet's a theocracy.

Or at least it was sometime during the Middle Ages, I'm not an expert or anything, I just know it was ruled by the Dali Lamas until they were conquered by Red China.

I was pretty sure Tibet was largely feudal until the 17th century. The monasteries had rather little power until the late 14th century. The Dalai Lama didn't even exist until around 1400, and took power over Tibet around 1630.
 
Tibet's a theocracy.

Or at least it was sometime during the Middle Ages, I'm not an expert or anything, I just know it was ruled by the Dali Lamas until they were conquered by Red China.

The Dalai Lama didn't exist in the game timeframe.
 
Thuggees? Why? That's 19th century British empire era.

Wikipedia civilises me that they have/had been active in India for centuries. The earliest mention about them dates in 1356, describing events in about 1290. If they appear a bit earlier it's not that big deal if the crusades can start in the 9th century...

e. Ninja'd, and badly. :D

ee. Tack så mycket, Doomdark and Paradox! Already waiting for the proper DDs!
 
Last edited:
I thought Communist China only reconquered Tibet?
That's difficult to differentiate. The Dalai Lamas ruled Tibet continuously but were to wildly varying degrees Chinese vasalls.