yes, I would love that. I could add more tags to Vicky and make it even better (hard to do)... the possibilities are endless.
I think it's an awesome idea.
I think it's an awesome idea.
Not to mention more POP types, more factories, more RGOs. *faints*rcduggan said:yes, I would love that. I could add more tags to Vicky and make it even better (hard to do)... the possibilities are endless.
I think it's an awesome idea.
the open question is the content of the contract between Paradox and SoandSo.Dietmar1982 said:The main reason why I would have preferred, a "no strings attached" approach to the one chosen. Is not because I don't want to pay paradox 5 or 10 €, I would happily pay double that, just to get the source code. It's mostly because I fear that they will demand results, and a finished product.
Are you sure I am only a lead developer?hildoceras said:From info I got from a lead developer, ...
Johan said:We would sell everything through gamersgate and own the copyright. All code developed would be accessible for those in the program.
We had the following assets.
* A game-engine that strategygames can be built in, with several version for various game-types.
* A distribution system where amount of sales is irrelevant for being distributed at all, that scales nicely.
* A large community of people that wants to make their own dreams come true.
Contract?Pishtaco said:And if "all code developed would be accessible for those in the program", what's to stop someone else releasing your work for less money?
Lord Ederon said:Contract?