• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
It's an interesting perspective, to see parties ebb and flow, much alongside their fortunes in war. Likewise, it's remarkable what a warlike path America's illustrious men led her on, and the phrase ending the summary seems incredibly appropriate.

Great summary. I also liked the picture collection quite a bit.
 
Very nice. I especially like the slightly altered states and capitals. It's just the degree of skew that makes this AAR enjoyable!
 
RGB: Thanks; I figured it would be usefull to you all, and myself, to get back to the swing of things.

Dr. G: Welcome back, you can hit the timline if you want a more consolidated update.

TheH: Thank you sir. Indeed it was fun getting a little fantasy in there, for example- Clark, Nebraska instead of Lincoln given that Honest Abe never really amounted to much in Footsteps.
 
The Marshall Plan
1944-1948
~~

George C. Marshall, scion of the long and famous family of political heroes of Virginia, was not an imposing figure. Although a military man, he lacked the bravado of MacArthur, the doggedness of Bacon or the heroism of Washington. But for all that he lacked those famous military presidents' most famous characteristics, he made up for it with his determination and dive. Marshall was a man who saw a vision for a better America, and worked hard to make it happen. He took Hoover's and MacArthur's public works and combined it with the motivation and drive of Daniel Clark. Building off the financial buffering of the Mexican occupation, Marshall helped turn the American industrial economy into the greatest in the world. "The Great American Fist" swung heavy and rapid. Marshall used rebuilding Mexico, and American funded rebuilding of England, Germany and Italy. Industrial goods stamped General Motors, Ford and Dupont saw use across the civilized world. The late 40's and 50's were the single greatest period of American economic growth. As the rest of the world shook off the decade long conflict, the United States stood primed to rise.

Europe.jpg

Europe, including:
Italian States- Savoy, Modena, Florence, The Holy See, The Kingdom of Sicily-Sardinia
The Balkan States- Bosnia, Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria, Greece

But all was not well in the world. The conflagration of the Great War left two great powers in control of the continent, with their satellites and allies in tow. A "Cold War" began between the British Empire, which controlled much of Africa, India, and had allies in Japan, and Scandinavia, and Germany and her allies in Austria-Hungary, the Italies, China and France. The Russian Empire, ever on the verge of disaster and the Ottoman Empire, still endeavoring to survive into the modern era, stayed relatively neutral until the late 1950's. War was everywhere, even if total war was in the rear view mirror. The Austro-Hungarian Empire was split by ethnic conflict and civil strife. The Hungarian rising middle class was distrustful of the Austrian autocrats who in turn were devoting their entire energy into holding down violent nationalist sects in North Italy, Southern France and the Balkans.

During the Great War, Emperor Franz Ferdinand in 1930 left the Austrian throne in contention. By marriage, Franz Ferdinand had male children, but my law they were unable to inherit, and instead the throne passed to Otto I, great-great nephew of Franz Joseph I, who had seen Austria's rise to prominence and industrial independence of Germany. But Hungarian Nationalists, eager to sew discord in the Empire, promoted and crowned Maximilian, Emperor Franz Ferdinand's eldest son. The Austrian Civil War began in earnest in 1945, with pro-Maximilian rebels seizing the arsenal at Budapest. Promising freedom to the Hungarians, Poles and Serbs, Maximilian's coronation sparked off revolts across the country. French Communists organized in Germanic occupied France, Italian Partisans disrupted troop movements to stop them, and the Hungarian-Polish army routed the Austrians at the decisive battle of Gran. As Russia and the Ottoman Empire watched wearily, the Germans took action. As the Kaiser's troops marched across the border, war on the other side of the continent began as well.

Asia.jpg

Asia including:
German Eastern Colonies- German Persia, German Indochina
English Colonies and Dominions- Saudi Arabia, India, Malay, British China
American Colonies and Dominions- American India, Afghanistan, The Philippines, the Chinese Free States
Independent Asian States- Iran, Nepal, Vietnamese Rebels, China, Japan


In Asia, Germany and England reigned supreme. But the conflict still burning in China, a civil war stretching back over a decade was center stage. American supported Communists, seeing safe haven in America's "Free States" of Coastal China. A legacy of Herbert Hoover, the Free States of China were financially and politically independent zones which paid tribute to China but were defended and effectively still ruled by the United States Navy. With the long history of support for the Chinese Communists, the American Navy was more then happy to see the free states act as protected bases for insurrection, and in one of its darker moments, the USN helped Mao Zedong, overthrow and murder Zhu De. As a result, Mao held sole power in the Communist Party of China, and turned to uniting the rebel armies. For much of the late 30's and early 40's, the Imperial faction was able to rebuild as Mao united the rebel armies and defeated the leaders of the opposition.

But with continued Japanese pressure on the coasts and into Manchuria, the Imperial Chinese were running out of options. The long promoter of the Imperial Throne, Austria, was unable to send aid to their Asian allies, and so the task felt to an already stretched Germany. The Germans, happy to undermine Japanese attempts to extend power into Central Asia, began shipping weapons into Northern China using their bases in formerly French Indo-China. In response, the Americans and British engineered a counter-rebellion. The League for the Independence of Vietnam, led by Vo Nguyen Giap and Nguyễn Sinh Cung, began its guerrilla war in Vietnam. By 1947 they had seized control of much of the south of Vietnam. From Manchuria to the south of Indo-China, conflict gripped the Far East.


Africa.jpg

Africa
Latin Africa- French West Africa, Madagascar, Spanish Africa
Anglophone- British West Africa, Greater Nigeria, British East Africa, South Africa, American Angola
Germanic Africa- The Golden Coast; German Congo, German East Africa
Non-Western- Turkish Libya, Kingdom of North Africa, Ethiopia, Somalia, Egypt

In Africa, post-war nationalism was taking root, but was well checked by the powers that be. Anglo-German Africa, which accounted for at least 80% of colonized Africa was held in an iron grip. With the economic toll of the war still unrepaired, Africa was a vital source of raw material for the rebuilding of English and German industry. In French, Spanish and Turkish Africa, things were different. French Algeria was a source of terrible fighting during the Great War, and native Algerians, promised independence by both sides of the conflict, found themselves once again trapped by their colonial masters. The result: a series of revolts and rebellions throughout the colony. Turkish Libya was the sight of the first open conflict of the post-war era as Sicilian colonial ambitions boiled over into open war. General Annibale Bergonzoli of the Royal Sicilian Army landed in Western Libya, and fought series of battles against Turkish defense forces. By 1948 the war ground to a stand still but the two sides would continue to dispute possession of the colony through the 1970's.

In his support of Mao in China, the Vietnamese nationalists and his neutrality in the face of Austria's disintegration, George Marshall proved to be a dynamic foreign policy leader. His critics called him soft, going so far as to label him the "King of Hearts" for his lack of action. His sharpest criticism came from a junior senator from Wisconsin named Joe McCarthy. A fervent pro-German, McCarthy railed against the "Red Menace" gripping the nation. While Socialists and the Socialist Party were long accepted in America, Communism was always seen its violent cousin. The failure of Roosevelt in the 30's had only worsened Socialism's popularity in the States. Especially in the South and increasingly in the Mid-West, anti-Socialist and Anti-Communist proponents were gaining ground. And now Marshall, the state-capitalist that he was, found himself under siege at every step. For two years he was battered, bruised and assaulted by the "Eagle's Nest", the anti-Communist activists of the Senate led by McCarthy. In the end, Marshall, more the administrator than President, threw in the towel. After only 1 term, Marshall resigned, and 12 years of rule by military men came to an end. The Election of 1948 would be as wide open a race as 1944 had been.

marhome.jpg

George C. Marshall, Republican, 29th President 1944-1948
 
McCarthy brings down the junta? Whodda thunk.
 
To The East
~~
1948-1956

As the election of 1948 loomed, the Republicans scrambled to find a replacement for the popular, if distant, George Marshall. The primary appeared to be as much a battle as the race for the White House would be. Arthur H. Vandenberg, the Secretary of State, appeared as an early frontrunner. As events in Europe heated up and Colonial Africa began to boil with potential conflict, the idea of a firm hand at the foreign policy wheel was popular with the party elite. While Vandenberg favored the Rooseveltian isolationism and withdrawal from Europe, he opposed the Socialist backed economic initiatives and Hooverian development programs. He felt, with Marshall's economic boom in the near past, private citizens should take up the burden of development. Opposing him were two strong politicians. The first was popular left-wing Republican Thomas Kennedy of Pennsylvania, and second Earl Warren of California. Both came from states vital to the Republican nomination (while Vandenberg's native Michigan had supported the Republicans throughout the MacArthur years)

For the Socialists, it was time return to an old face. Clarence Edward Case, opponent of FDR in the primary in 1932 won the early primaries and coasted to an easy victory to seize the Socialist platform. An East-Coast Socialist, he was at odds with the California based heart of the party. But he was popular in the mid-west and New England, and many in the party felt he could swing the deciding state of New York (Since 1900, New York had carried the election in all but one election, 1916). The Nationalists meanwhile went to a Senator from Missouri, hoping to regain the ground lost to Marshall in the heartland. James Kem, a conservative Nationalist, was hardly the firebrand of a politician that MacArthur had been but was a solid debater and eager to attack his political rivals. With the sides drawn, the election went ahead. Arthur Vandenberg never gave up his lead and carried the Republican nomination with heavy debate. Rather than splitting the Republican vote, the hard fought primary galvanized the party base and carried the general election.

1952.jpg

Clarence Edward Case and William F. Knowland- Socialist- 82[/purple]
James Kem and Allan Shivers- Nationalist- 62
Arthur Vandenberg and Earl Warren- Republican- 389

Vandenberg won by a wide margin, but only electorally. The popular vote was much closer, and Congress was divided wildly. Facing a hostile House, an apathetic public and a world in the brink of chaos, Vandenberg had his work cut out for him. Simmering unrest in Africa broke out into open conflict and Vandenberg quickly retreated to his isolationist stances. Calling for the Conference of New York, the American President invited the representatives of the major colonial powers (but France, with whom the American government was still wildly at odds) together to redraw the map of Africa. Recognizing the independence of the Kingdom of Ethiopia (and extending to it future control of Somalia), the Great Powers set about attempting to design a post-colonial African continent amenable to their individual needs. This conference, which eventually developed into the Council of Nations, did not end colonial strife in Africa as conflict between the Turks and Sicilians would rage for some time, it was notable for its reformation of the field of international post-war diplomacy. Ultimately even this Council would break down (to be reformed a decade later) but it is still remembered as the great legacy of President Vandenberg.

Unfortunately, Vandenberg would pass away after 2 and a half years in office, his Vice President, Earl Warren, was considerate and careful, but saw the continued erosion of support form the party who was uninterested in the Californian, seen as much as a liability as a base of support. Weary eyes in the South looked across the border at the rising tide of violence in Mexico, and anxious eyes in the West looked to the rise of Imperial ambition in the Japanese Manchurian invasion. It was becoming apparent to many that isolationism was going by the wayside. The world appeared to be a pot about to overflow, and overflow it would with the death of the Tsar. Alexander IV, who had survived hemophilia and years of potential revolt, finally passed away in 1953. He was inherited by his great-grandfather's 3rd son's grandson, who rose to the throne in St. Petersburg as Vladimir I, Emperor of Russia. While few could question his legitimacy as male heir, many questioned his legitimacy to rule by autocratic right. Quickly, rebellion broke out. A general strike in the Capital was followed by armed unrest in Poland, the Baltic, the South and most worrying, Finland. Civil War now reared its ugly head in two of Europe's oldest empires.

RussianCivilWar.jpg

The Russian Civil War
(Maroon- Loyal to Vladimir; Red- Communist, Gold- Polish Nationalist, Blue- Baltic Separatists, Green- Finnish Nationalists)

As the Election of 1952 came into the horizon, the Republicans once again found themselves swapping horses. While Warren was a fine administrator and politician, he was not someone who the Republicans felt motivated to support. It appeared that for the 4th time in as many elections, the Grand Old Party would be bringing a new name to the ballot. Warren was able to carry the west, but no one presumed the Republicans would ever win over the West Coast again. The battle for the GOP nomination would come down to a battle between the mid-west and the mid-Atlantic. Carey Estes Kefauver of Tennessee was seen as a crime-buster and a go-getter. Meanwhile William Preston Lane Jr. was a disciple of the Herbert Hoover school of public motivation and MacArthurian public works. In the end, promises of public works, modern bridges and a new highway reform bill won out over crime fighting and transparency as William Lane won nomination for the Republican Party.

Realistically speaking, the Nationalists and Socialists had no better opportunity to strike at the seat of power. Republicans were backing any horse they could, and a unified front opposing them could bring about swift change. Unfortunately, pluralism was rampant in the United States, not solely in the party of Daniel Clark. Thomas B. Fugate took an early lead to the Nationalist nomination coming out of the State of Virginia. But he would face stiff opposition from more conservative Texan politicians highlighted by Allan Shivers, failed Vice Presidential candidate in 52. It was a split which, unlike the average argument in primary season did not find itself repaired in the general election. In the end, the Socialists backed the same ticket it had 4 years earlier, and landed the same results. Fugate carried the primaries late, but on the campaign trail came out flat. The weight of New England helped carry Lane to an early lead, and the campaign broke down around geographic lines. Nationalist dissention gave Lane a win in Louisiana and North Carolina and the Socialists lagged behind once again. 1952 belonged once more to the Republicans.

1952.jpg

Clarence Edward Case and William F. Knowland- Socialist- 72
Thomas Fugate and Richard Nixon- Nationalist - 126
William Preston Lane and Nelson Rockefeller- Republican - 336
 
Last edited:
1. Pluralistic America seems very interesting, with internal party politics often spilling over into election politics.
2. Russia's 1950s Civil War and the Scramble Out of Africa really emphasise the different-ness of this world.
3. West Coast is so reliably socialist. I wonder what the social attitudes to this geographic politics are like, like...what do the pundits say?
 
1. Pluralistic America seems very interesting, with internal party politics often spilling over into election politics.
2. Russia's 1950s Civil War and the Scramble Out of Africa really emphasise the different-ness of this world.
3. West Coast is so reliably socialist. I wonder what the social attitudes to this geographic politics are like, like...what do the pundits say?


Thanks, I'm enjoying the otherworldness, but of course its all grounded in reality. Vietnam, China, Russian civil unrest, etc. With World War 1 ending with a whimper and no real conclusion,the cataclystic post-war decades never existed.

As to the West Coast, much of that comes from two things. First, the migration of African Americans to the west following the Civil War. It was the African Americans who helped build the Populist party, hand in hand with farmers in the mid-west. While the farmers have wavered, the African Americans never did. Second, the West has bee so strongly socialist for so long that its hard to break into the field without the Socialist ticket. While you have some politicians (like Nixon) who are able through sheer force of will, break into the Socialist bloc, but its not easy. The Republicans have remained in control of New England since the 1860's, and the Naionalists have their base in the deep south (South Texas, Alabama, Mississippi, etc.) That leaves the mid-atlantic and the midwest as the big debate. Ohio, New York, pennsylvania, Illinois and Virginia are really the states that decide the elections year in and year out.
 
Zulu said:
Ohio, New York, pennsylvania, Illinois and Virginia are really the states that decide the elections year in and year out.

Haha - the perpetual swing states, I wonder what it's like living in one of those on election year.
 
Conflagration
~~

William_Preston_Lane_on_Chesapeake_Bay_Bridge.jpg

William Preston Lane Jr, 32nd president of the United States of America

President Lane came to office in the shadow of war. Civil War in Austria and Russia finally pushed the Germans into action in 1956, pulling Central and Eastern Europe into a complicated and ugly war. Meanwhile rebellion in Vietnam, open war in Ottoman Africa and the rise of the Kenya Land and Freedom Army in Anglo-German Africa further stirred the pot. But for Lane, America's place in the world was apart from the struggle and conflict. Since the war in Mexico in the early 40's, the United States had not used its military abroad. Lane brought further freedoms to Cuba, the Phillipines and American Africa (renamed Namibia in 1960, the official year of full independence) and continued to curtail active American involvement in the Pacific. At home, Lane found action a little more difficult. Lackluster Republican performance in the House and Senate left the Grand Old Party without a majority, and Lane without a base of support.

The Socialists fought Lane on tax cuts for the wealthy, the Nationalists fought spending cuts on the military. Lane's grand plan to return American investments into America was running into a series of roadblocks. While he was able to begin a new nation-wide series of roads, bridges and interstates, it came at the cost of all of his political capital and much of the country's budget surplus. The laying of a major tunnel across the President's homeland of the Chesapeake Bay, and the foundation of a Colombia-Los Angeles highway were the two cornerstones to Lane's development projects, and remain his legacy. But Lane and the Republicans suffered from the malaise of the American retraction. Republicans were continuing to withdraw from public activity, and the Socialists and Nationalists continued to make gains in the midterms. By the time the elections of 1958 came to the horizon, it became clear that Lane was on the way out.

Rat_war_3.jpg

Modern War

In Russia, German troops crossed over the border into Poland in the early 1950's, and began to take an active roll in the war a few years later. The goal of Kaiser Ludwig was simple, crush the revolution in Poland and put an end to the Russian Empire in Eastern Europe. Ludwig, piloted by Chancellor Josias Georg Wilhelm, designed a post-war Russia, with independent German-sponsored states in the Baltic, Ukraine and an enlarged German Caspian. So confident in their plans were the German High Command in victory that the Germans only committed about 1/5th of their active military to the campaign. A majority of the Reich's army was left to defend the Austrian border and hold down potential unrest in France and Denmark. It was a decision which turned out to be a costly one. As the German army became bogged down by rebels in Minsk, the Russian Revolutionaries and Reactionaries put aside their struggle to turn their combined attention against the invasion from the West. Open war was on.

At home, as Lane worked to rebuild his failing political clout, the rival parties finally began to coalesce. For the Socialists, the "Drive to the Middl" had begun in earnest. After two runs from New Jersey, Clarence Case was out, and a series of new faces came to the front. Former Secretary of the Treasury John Snyder of Arkansas, who had crossed over from the Republican Party, was an early favorite. But his Republican roots kept his campaign from taking off in New York or the West Coast. In the end he was surpassed by Phil M. Donnelly, the philosophical and intellectual heart of the Socialist movement. He, and running mate Henry A Wallace, wanted to bring the party back to its Populist roots. For the Socialists, dethroning the Republicans in Ohio and the Mid-West was the only goal, and the Nationalists were left on the backburner, and with good reason, as the Nationalists appeared more divided and disorganized as ever. But appearances gave way to a very different reality.

FullC71601D0000-00-00.jpg

Phil M. Donnelly, Socialist, Intellectual, Presidential Hopeful

The Nationalist Party was divided, badly heading into 1956. Three groups dominated politics in the party, the Hardliners, the Old Guard and the Moderates. The Moderates, primarily based in the Mid-West and South-East, were converted Republicans, economic moderates and in general held a pro-English foreign policy stance. The Old Guard were located in the deep south and were the remnants of the pre-Macarthur elements of the party. They were economically conservative, socially moderate and internationally interested only in expanding the Monroe-Johnson doctrine of American hegemony in the Western Hemisphere. The last group were the Hard Liners, Economically and Socially conservative, pro-German and anti-Communist. The hard liners were located primarily in the North, Mid-Atlantic, and in the Socialist held west. Men like Richard Nixon of California and Joseph McCarthy of Minnesota who viewed President Bacon (wildly unpopular in most circles) as the founder of the Nationalist anti-union and anti-Communist wing. They despised the American involvement in Vietnam and China and hoped to see Austro-German dominance of Eastern Europe. The vilified Herbert Hoover and FDR for their disastrous wars against Germany but saw the American Empire as a source of financial pillaging.

For the Nationalists, unifying these three elements was essential to victory. And one man, for all that he was an also-ran, suddenly had the momentum to do just that. Well liked, respected and most of all not feared, Alben W. Barkley. Barkley, with the aid of former VP Gordon Browning, toured the South and Mid-West, binding the old guard to the moderates in a show of political gamesmanship rarely seen. It was only the hardliners who resisted. In one of the many backroom deals so common in the halls of Power, the Nationalist party forged an 11th hour compromise. Alben Barkley carried the Presidency, but no one had any belief that he would be around for the long haul. So, to bring the party together behind him, the base agreed to bring a hardliner onboard. The party had three choices: first, Californian Richard Nixon, second Minnesota Senator Joe McCarthy and Floridian Spessard Holland. In the end it came down to political expediency. California was not going to go to the Nationalists, and Florida was by and large considered a lock. But McCarthy's mid western appeal and fiery rhetoric could potential pry the mid-west from Republican hands, and in the end he was the chosen Vice President. The Hard Liners felt they had won, while the moderates felt that an extremist like McCarthy could be swept aside in 4 years. Both sides would prove to be correct.

1956.jpg

Alben W. Barkley and Joseph McCarthy, Nationalist- 282
William Preston Lane and Nelson Rockefeller, Republican- 195
Phil M. Donnelly and Henry A Wallace, Socialist- 62
 
Somehow I never tire of your political races :D watching alternate elections unfold with the same article-like reading as a historical one is rather sensational . Well done as always , zulu :D
 
Another McCarthy government, and by the looks of it, the threat of another war...
 
A Final, All-Out Battle
~~

Alben W. Barkley died before inauguration, and to the horror of the Socialists and moderate Nationalists, the new President of the United States was none other than "Tail gunner" Joe McCarthy. Fervent anti-Communist, McCarthy's very first act of business was to remove the military commanders who had piloted the pro-Communist China stance in the Pacific. The leadership of the American navy was purged almost overnight, and the course of the American international stance changed with it. McCarthy began shifting military resources to support the Japanese invasion of Manchuria, the German invasion of Russia and the Austrian conflict in France. But almost immediately he ran into the unbending will of a suddenly surprising enemy. By 1958 McCarty became limited to executive orders and ill-fated attempts at legislative coercion. For all his anti-communist bluster and the support he had in much of the middle-class, Joe McCarthy had not foreseen the young, rich, and charismatic leadership of the New Socialists.

For the New Socialists, social reform was more than a hobby, it was a calling. These were men who came to office in 1956 and 1958, often times unseating long term Socialist congressmen in the West. For these Young Turks, Socialism was the key to racial and socio-economic equality. While they were certainly not in favor of Communism, despite McCarthy's rants, they did believe in a widening of the social safety net, and a restructuring of the racial policies of discrimination which had taken root in much of the South. They fought organized crime, political corruption and government sloth. Led by men such as; former Socialist Whip Hastings Keith, the Kennedy brothers (John and Robert), Clair Engle of California, William Bennett of Colombia, and Robert W. Levering of Ohio, the New Socialists braved a bold path through forceful legislation, though most, if not all, were defeated. Still, for a nation so deep in the malaise of political inaction, this group of firebrands stood in stark contrast.

photo-history4_9a.jpg

William A. C. Bennet, the intellectual head of the New Socialist movement.

McCarthy pressed on headless to his enemies. From reorganizing the navy to effectively banishing the more liberal diplomats to the least important posts, McCarthy did everything he could to undermine the old order. The result was significant. In Asia, the Vietnamese rebellion was nearly destroyed, forced to flee into Cambodia and British Indochina to avoid complete destruction. In Asia, Japan's conquest of Manchuria came to a rapid conclusion and the Chinese communists were collapsing on all fronts. In Africa, Namibian rebels, fearing a return to German style rule, revolted. Caribbean and Mexican Communist revolts broke out to attempt drive American backed strongmen from power. In the end, even the New Socialists were forced to allow to increase military spending and development. In the end, no one was surprised when conflict broke out. French Communists finally drove the Austrians out of Southern France and began seizing property. Things came to a head when the French seized a series of American vessels, putting the captains to death and 'liberating' the cargo. It was the casus belli McCarthy needed to support his Austrian-German allies.

American Marines landed on Corsica, even as the election of 1960 heated up. A few months later they were positioned to land in the South of France, but things fell apart too soon. England, fearing a return to hostile France, performed one of the greatest naval invasions in history, landing a massive army in Brittany, and driving French forces back with ease. The French people greeted the English as liberators, finally arriving to drive the German oppressors out. The Germans, seeing the coming tide of war, crossed over the Rhine. The Germans also grew tired of the civil war in Austria and crossed the border, seizing Maximilian and destroying the Hungarian will to war. Promising the Northern Italian States to Sicily (frustrated as they were in Africa), and Germany purchased itself an alliance of Central European powers. The Great Alliance of Germany, Austria and Italy now faced off against the English, Russians and Ottoman Turks. The battlefields were France, Poland and North Africa, but that would change. The Great War had returned, this time far deadlier than anyone could have imagined.

Allied%20troops.jpg

Operation Waterloo- the Invasion of Corsica

Back in the United States, the Nationalist Party had descended once again into internal strife. McCarthy was still President, but he had not been elected to that office. The middle of the party wanted nothing to do with the crusading Anti-Communist who, in his approaching lame-duck session began removing from offices high and low anyone he felt was a Communist sympathizer. But Joe McCarthy was a fighter, and even while he undermined years of Republican and Socialist rule, began dividing his own party's opposition. McCarthy threw his very public support behind the pre-presidential platform of Gordon Browning, immediately derailing him in the eyes of the middle of the party. McCarthy followed this up with a public condemnation of the campaign finance practices of Richard Nixon, his on-again off-again ally from the West. To top if all off, McCarthy's invasion of Corsica was a rousing success as French troops were surrendering en masse (mostly out of fear of the Communist uprising than from fear of the Americans). How could the Nationalists turn on a wartime president?

The Republicans, still reeling from the disappointment following President Lane's one term in office and, rather publically confronting the rise of the New Socialists, looked to the youth of their party for reinvigoration. Francis John Myers of Pennsylvania, Lyndon Johnson of Texas and former Vice President Nelson Rockefeller emerged as the frontrunners in the primaries. All three campaigned on similar platforms, including the entry into the War as a full participant allied with the British. It appeared that the Texan would carry the day until on the eve of the party's nomination, it was discovered that Johnson and Myers had worked a deal, attempting to cut out Rockefeller and he New Englanders from the platform all together. Johnson felt that New England would carry red regardless of the candidate, and that by sticking close to the "Old Party", the Republicans risked loosing the election to the Socialists, or perhaps worse yet to Tailgunner Joe. Johnson however underestimated the power of New England, and the Northerners confronted Myers, won him over and pushed through the nomination of the young Rockefeller.

What followed would be an election which would see itself played out for the next 20 years. A New Socialist against a Rockefeller Republican for the White House. The Socialists quickly nominated Sam Ervin a noted anti-McCarthian who had come to fame by attempting to censure the sitting President. Ervin came from North Carolina and took to the campaign trail like a rocket, and selected Grant Sawyer of Nevada as his VP. The race quickly boiled down to a race for 3 key states: Ohio, Illinois and New York. The Young Socialists, namely the Kennedy's and Robert W. Levering, held a great deal of sway in Ohio. If they could win those states, it would clear the way for a runaway victory in the Mid-West, despite mid-term gains by the Republicans in each state. But at the end of the day it came down to one pivotal argument; war. In the first Nationally televised debate (McCarthy opted out, knowing that his appearance and charisma was somewhat lacking on television), Rockefeller's youth and charm won over the vim and vinegar of Ervin. And in a stunning turnaround, the Republicans not only swept the mid-west, but also stole Colombia, Minnesota and Nebraska from the Socialists, returning the GOP to office after 4 years and signaling the full entry of the United States into war.

1960.jpg

Nelson Rockefeller and Francis John Myers- Republican- 410
Sam Ervin and Robert Levering- Socialist- 116
Joseph McCarthy and Karl Mundt- Nationalist- 10
 
A very thorough turnaround of political fortunes, but another Great War is seemingly full on now...