• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Why not start right after WW1? The allies have won, the Ottomans are weak - everyone but some turks in Anatolia are fine with the idea that Greece gets a major expansion of provinces with greek population while Italy hopes to get the southern coast of Asia Minor as a new colony and England and France divide the ottoman area of nowadays Iraq/Syria among themselves.

The greco-turkish war starts, at the start the greeks on the advantage as one of the winners of WW1, receiving supplies from the British Empire. On the other the turkish rmere ebels that have abandoned the ottoman empire to defend their turkish homeland. Soldiers who already have lost once when their empire surrendered but who take up arms again...
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Why not start right after WW1? The allies have won, the Ottomans are weak - everyone but some turks in Anatolia are fine with the idea that Greece gets a major expansion of provinces with greek population while Italy hopes to get the southern coast of Asia Minor as a new colony and England and France divide the ottoman area of nowadays Iraq/Syria among themselves.

The greco-turkish war starts, at the start the greeks on the advantage as one of the winners of WW1, receiving supplies from the British Empire. On the other the turkish rmere ebels that have abandoned the ottoman empire to defend their turkish homeland. Soldiers who already have lost once when their empire surrendered but who take up arms again...
In fact, it is set that Greece acquired territory in the Anatolian Peninsula after World War I.

As a result, the territory has expanded, but political issues such as ethnic groups have grown, making the regime more unstable than in the past. For this, we want to be able to choose different options for the state system.
 

Attachments

  • 12.jpeg
    12.jpeg
    37,6 KB · Views: 0