It may just be me, but I find the mention only of AI dealing with rebellions, and not rebellions themselves, to be extremely disturbing.
The 1.2 patch, a little bit on contents
- Thread starter Kallocain
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
- Status
Capis borrowing from NB to fund projects is not in the game. NB is just for governments that need to take loans.
Yes it is, but continent wide anarcho-liberal/jacobin rebellions *probably* ought not be happening in the first place.
I mean seriously - Jacobins in the US?
In Russia or Prussia while they're absolute monarchy's? sure.
Even eventually in a constitutional monarchy with a restrictive franchise... but they still revolt even when you have universal voting.
In addition, you often can't even enact reforms, despite repeated country wide revolts because your upper house doesn't think its serious enough since 'average' militancy is low.
That's Working As Designed.
The assimilation rate is ahistorically big, but this was done to improve performance in the end-game (i.e. less different POPs to calculate and keep track of).
You can change this manually very easily if you want to.
But reducing assimilation would cause performance trouble in late game. Or so i heard.
So if it has to be kept, at least colonial migration could be cut down and assimilation there (i assume there is assimilation in colonies, too?) needs to be into majority and not primary culture, so we don't have Swedish Egypt or something.
Question: is it possible to change the assimilation rate per pop-type?
That would allow some mid-points that would maintain the overall ethnic makeup but severely kill off the possible number of pops. (thinking for modding here)
This is not true. Capitalists can borrow from the NB if there are no factories in the state.
In my experience, the main rebellion problem has been just that, that the AI cant handle it and constantly has their entire country under rebel occupation.
In my very first game as Korea, when i didnt know what i was doing (and hence picked the event choise regarding westernization that permanently raises militancy), i had issues with militancy, but all it would ever do was to spawn 2-division armies here and there, which could be killed in a few days by shift-clicking my armies around ^_^
In my second game, also playing an asian country, now choosing the isolation event, my militancy and conciousness is constantly dropping down to 0, no matter how much i tax, tarriff, abuse and humiliate my own peasants
This may be argued that "well wait until lategame", but the fact remains, the AI ALREADY has their entire countries under rebel occupation (which means they let the rebel armies sit there in peace until the occupation timer finished, which is about 120 days?).
The AI rebel problem is imo the thing that needs fixing.
I don't see why they would keep pawning the change when it has already been programmed.
v
v
In my experience, the main rebellion problem has been just that, that the AI cant handle it and constantly has their entire country under rebel occupation.
In my very first game as Korea, when i didnt know what i was doing (and hence picked the event choise regarding westernization that permanently raises militancy), i had issues with militancy, but all it would ever do was to spawn 2-division armies here and there, which could be killed in a few days by shift-clicking my armies around ^_^
In my second game, also playing an asian country, now choosing the isolation event, my militancy and conciousness is constantly dropping down to 0, no matter how much i tax, tarriff, abuse and humiliate my own peasants
This may be argued that "well wait until lategame", but the fact remains, the AI ALREADY has their entire countries under rebel occupation (which means they let the rebel armies sit there in peace until the occupation timer finished, which is about 120 days?).
The AI rebel problem is imo the thing that needs fixing.
uh. play a bit more.
You get country-wide pan-nationalist revolts as *Sweden*.
A significant part of the problem I'll admit isn't the the rebellions per se, but the inability of governments to reform despite constant rebellions because average militancy isn't brought up by a few really really angry pops, but you get massive jacobin revolts even as the US, and the frequency is utterly ridiculous.
Well, if the game utilized more than one cpu cores then I'm sure the end-game performance will improve drastically regardless of the amount of populations. It's a total pain to play my Yugoslavia game in 1951 now because of the amount of lag (as in game running slow).
As you can see in the screenshot below, the game is underutilizing my computer resources. For a cpu-intensive game, it needs to utilize more of processor resources but it's not and thus causing performance issues late game when there is usually a lot of action. My computer should be able to rip apart this game but it's not. My computer can run Mafia II or Metro 2033 on maximum settings with virtually no issues. This game? It's slagging, largely because of the under-utilization of computer resources. If Paradox programed the game to utilize all of my computer's resources then all performance issues everyone's been having will essentially go away and we'll have a better game in our hands.
Last edited:
Then obviously it's poorly designed
Have you actually checked for example national composition by 1870 in say Austria? There was ideas flowing around like enabling small pops to merge with big pops quite fast but when you have pops of a similar size or vise versa to greatly slow down the process.
Otherwise china conquest is quite borked and this assimilation one of the main reasons why AI Prussia is a weakling compared to any colonial power.
It's supposed to happen, but it never - or at least extremely seldom - actually does. I each game as the US, I've seen only one or two succesful attempts to establish a factory in a state that didn't have any at the start, and if these turn out to be unprofitable, the next local projects are eternally stalled as well. Meanwhile, the pops in the four or five industrial states hoard insane amounts of cash in the NB (around $10 million in 1870) that nobody seems to want.
Vasily: Changing such complicated program to multi-threading isn't simple, so you most likely need to wait until the next engine generation.
Hmm, it seems to be missing some major elements.
1. How about the overpromotion of bureaucrats and soldiers?
2. The frequency of rebellions?
3. Colonial over-migration?
1. How about the overpromotion of bureaucrats and soldiers?
2. The frequency of rebellions?
3. Colonial over-migration?
Last edited:
- Status