Since the development team has separated Tajik culture from Persian culture, the expressions of those who were originally Eastern Persian culture should also be adjusted accordingly.
New Cultures in 1178
- Thread starter Noxatrox
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
See, this is why CK3 should have a "Turco-Iranian" culture like EUIV does.
"Formed from various Turkic and Iranian cultures in the year 1000"
This would encompass Tajiks, Oghuz, Persians, Karluks, Afghans, etc. with ease. Perhaps there could also be a decision to create this culture in the 867 start for Turks ruling over Iranians? Sort of like the Norman culture creating decision.
- 3
Because Persian is better than Tajik, and represent them having ruled much of Persian Iran beforehand
Persia living in the East has been assigned Tajik culture in CK3, so the role of Persian culture in the East should also be adjusted, such as Safar
- 2
Ghaznavids were Turks, who ruled Afghanistan and Punjab why would they be tajik?
- 2
So rectify a mistake with another mistake. They should be obviously be of Turko persian culture. Instead at later start date.
- 1
- 1
The dev team is right about the Ghaznavids. They might have been born from Turks originally, but culturally were Persian later on. It's like the Sultan of Egypt in 867 start, Egyptian cultured but from a Turkic family.
Culture =! Familial origins or how someone looks.
Culture =! Familial origins or how someone looks.
- 3
Now that each culture has racial caricatures to it, yes you are the origin. Is the ruler of Egypt in 867 an agricultural farmer or a slave that became a governor
- 1
- 1
In addition to English forming from the Conquest of England, Siculo-Norman already exists as a unique hybrid culture and should be present with the Norman conquest of southern Italy.
Also, in 1178 Cambro-Norman and Hiberno-Norman should be added similar to Norse-Gael with the continued Norman invasions that followed the Conquest of England. And there is also Scoto-Norman which the House of Bruce were. Like the Norse-Gaels these were celticized.
English and Sicilian will certainly be in, yes - they're already in the history files for those regions.
Norse-Gaelic is a possibility in vanilla, but there's no way they will add any Norman/Gaelic hybrid cultures as well; it just seems very niche and with too few provinces for PDX to bother. They clearly aren't fans of adding very small provincial cultures which are prone to disappearing quickly - see also: Crimean Gothic, Albanian.
That said, they may well add some of these suggestions as dynamic hybrid culture names.