In general, i think you have a misconception about cores in Hears of Iron: They are defined as areas which share culture, ethnology and language. While this definition very well applies to European Greece, Istanbul as well as some coastal parts of minor asia until into the 1920s, it does not apply to the rest of what you stated above. Maybe you are speaking the truth about a common idea about the foundation of some "New Rome" by the named nations. However, but each nation would have created that "New Rome" in their own shape. Each might have formed that new/old nation, but their individual cultural identity would have remained.
A nation doesn't magically form some non-existent uniform union of consisting of completely different cultures which only share one hypothetical (political) ideal, which 95% of all people don't even care about, as it's all about the ruling upper class.
This comparison is completely illogical. You are talking about a union of states sharing a simularity and a national heritage and comparing that to a completely inhomogenous area shared by cultural and national groups hostile to eachother.
Woa, what a threat! You obviously are an expert, as everyone else in this thread agrees with you
True. Greece had at least a little bit of industry. It still makes no sense on continental or global scale.
:blush:
You are talking about him: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgios_Papanikolaou ?
He sure was a good doctor, but I guess 75% of all people have never heard about him. Especially those who are not into medicine.
Still, according to your extensive knowledge, he obviously dwarfs Einstein, Heisenberg and all the others. They just copied his works and re-released them.
Yea, that might be true, before the romans took over southern italy and sicily.
This was most likely also true, but not in the medieval times, but when the romans had taken over the City-States. At least after 500AD this was definitely no longer the case. Whatever you base your numbers on, they are obviously flawed. Check with the Italian Censuses of the early 20th and late 19th century.
i cant understand where exacly is ur problem, as u saw in the event u can choose what areas u want to be national, take a look at the photo of the event in page 9, u may dissagree with me and i may dissagre with u, is there a reason for this converstion if we cant find common groud??
here is my anwer to what u say
greeks, serbians, italians and armenians were(and are) very very friendly(and for the italians we use to say ,one face one race[una faccia una razza]
with bulgarians there were some tensions in the years before but if u take account that in the mod the megali idea succed bulgarians would become a very small state and would like to become powerful again ,egyptians and arabians can be easily integrated by a powerful byzantium
and u say different cultures, do we have different culture?serbia bulgaria and italy are all affected by ancient greece and also the formem byzantine empire and all of us had and have the same style of life, ok the arab and egyptians may have some differences ,so integration
.
and in the medieval times south italy was full of greeks, accept it or not thats the reality
and before talking about greeks or any other civ please know a bit things about it ,here is a video about foreigners opinions about greece
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dohLcXQGRJM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTIT5RZd1kY&feature=relmfu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6QNisKeCJE&feature=relmfu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xgyPgcTFRA&feature=relmfu
to close this matter byzantium restoration is an ALTERNATIVE and we can only make HYPOTHESIS about it so we will never know what would be done in this occasion, so please stop or this crazyness and let the modder do whatever he wants.
i just gave an idea which could be fun and for the simple reason if some provices should be national or not we wrote 4 pages on this forum
everyone please relax:happy: