|
08-06-2002, 06:34
|
#1 |
|
Banned
   
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,082
|
Alexandria 1617 Scenario
In the 1617 scenario Alexandria is a
 colony with a population below 700. This can't be right...
|
|
|
08-06-2002, 08:55
|
#2 |
|
Custom User Title
Moderator
     
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,223
|
It isn't. In my 1617_tur.inc file it is listed as a city with 75,500. Have you installed an EEP or something? Check in yours. It's province 744.
__________________
It is not bigotry to be certain we are right; but it is bigotry to be unable to imagine how we might possibly have gone wrong. ‑G.K. Chesterton, essayist and novelist (1874‑1936) |
|
|
|
08-06-2002, 14:03
|
#3 |
|
Major
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 725
|
He means the 1700 scenario.
742, 743, and 744 have all been inexplicably decimated in 1700_tur.inc. By 1773 they are back, large once again. Bruce |
|
|
|
09-06-2002, 03:41
|
#4 |
|
Custom User Title
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,223
|
I see. Well this is still a bit strange. The population goes like this:
Code:
1617 1700 1773 742: 3,000 210 1,900 743: 11,000 315 5,300 744: 75,500 420 25,500 I'll need to run this by the betas and see what's happening here.
__________________
It is not bigotry to be certain we are right; but it is bigotry to be unable to imagine how we might possibly have gone wrong. ‑G.K. Chesterton, essayist and novelist (1874‑1936) |
|
|
|
10-06-2002, 09:02
|
#5 |
|
Custom User Title
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,223
|
OK, I've just given these three provinces intermediate population values between the 1617 and 1773 levels, and a fort level 1 each. Fixed and submitted, thanks for the report.
__________________
It is not bigotry to be certain we are right; but it is bigotry to be unable to imagine how we might possibly have gone wrong. ‑G.K. Chesterton, essayist and novelist (1874‑1936) |
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
