Paradox Interactive Forums  

Go Back   Paradox Interactive Forums > Fun Forums > History Forums > Post 1913

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-11-2006, 17:50   #1
The Gonzo
Kommer aldrig överge dig
 
The Gonzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Perfidious Albion
Posts: 585
Reichstag Fire

I was wondering, who really did set fire to the Reichstag? And what impact did it really have, would the Nazis have been able to get a majority without it?
__________________
A controversial new opera about Libya's flamboyant leader Muammar Gaddafi blasted opera buffs out of their seats at its world premiere, but music critics asked -- Where was the singing?

#4D6574
Quote:
Originally Posted by Olaus Petrus
Oh, you mean steam wagons. I have heard about those.
Faith in Humanity Meter: ||||||||||
The Gonzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2006, 07:05   #2
Dark Knight
Troll-slayer
Moderator
 
Dark Knight's Avatar
Victoria Revolutions BetaVictoria: Revolutions
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 9,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Gonzo
I was wondering, who really did set fire to the Reichstag? And what impact did it really have, would the Nazis have been able to get a majority without it?
Most likely, the Reichstag fire was started by Marinus van der Lubbe acting alone. It probably didn't make an ultimate difference to the Nazi seizure of power, since the Nazis would have banned the Communist party anyway.
__________________
The History Forum: A By-Product of the Computer Gaming Industry

Victoria: Based on a True Story

I did not envy him his devotion to Kurtz, though. He had not meditated over it. It came to him, and he accepted it with a sort of eager fatalism. I must say that to me it appeared about the most dangerous thing in every way he had come upon so far.
--- Heart of Darkness, Joseph Conrad
Dark Knight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2006, 09:44   #3
Alkar
Dark Lord wannabe
 
Alkar's Avatar
Diplomacy Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Deusone
Posts: 1,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Knight
Most likely, the Reichstag fire was started by Marinus van der Lubbe acting alone. It probably didn't make an ultimate difference to the Nazi seizure of power, since the Nazis would have banned the Communist party anyway.
Although it is possible that Van der Lubbe was involved in the Reichstag Fire, it is practically impossible he could have done it alone. The fire started on too many places at once in the Reichstag building for one man to have done it. Possibly the Nazis knew of his plans and started the fire them selves. He did make for an ideal scapegoat though. Additionally Van der Lubbe's conviction was overturned by a West German court in 1981.
Alkar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2006, 10:11   #4
michimueller
Hm, thinking
 
michimueller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Knight
Most likely, the Reichstag fire was started by Marinus van der Lubbe acting alone. It probably didn't make an ultimate difference to the Nazi seizure of power, since the Nazis would have banned the Communist party anyway.
I think it would have made quite a differnce. Sure, the communists may would have gotten banned anyway, but the direct power grab by hitler that ensured in a totalitarian dictatorship would be much much harder, and take much longer. The burning of the Reichstag was the perfect pretext for Hitlers power grab, practically giving him a Casus belli on all his enemies.
__________________
I'm anxious! It's true!
michimueller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2006, 22:55   #5
Karl Martell
Winter depri
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Aachen, Germany
Posts: 3,333
Well... IIRC, Hitler assumed office on the 30th of January, and the fire was only a few days later. The enabling act was passed a week after he took office. How much faster can you do a power grab???

I think, without a Reichstag fire, the ultimate outcome of the Nazi drive for power would have been the same - by mid-1933, parliamentary democracy would be dead. But even just a few weeks of fights between the Nazi government and a regular Reichstag, with communist deputies and social democrats, would have left an impression on the people. Maybe Hitler wouldn't have had the kind of popularity in 1934/35 that he had historically - he would have to push his agenda more openly, without useful pretexts like the Reichstag fire, and less people would have swallowed his lies.

Given how successfull the Nazis were in the remaining years before the war, however, it's unlikely that major changes would have resulted. The olympic games, the economic recovery, the scrapping of Versailles - all largely unaffacted by the way Hitler grabbed power. But you never know... butterflies...
Karl Martell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2006, 04:49   #6
Krivitsky
Colonel
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Downey, CA
Posts: 936
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Martell
Well... IIRC, Hitler assumed office on the 30th of January, and the fire was only a few days later. The enabling act was passed a week after he took office. How much faster can you do a power grab???

I think, without a Reichstag fire, the ultimate outcome of the Nazi drive for power would have been the same - by mid-1933, parliamentary democracy would be dead. But even just a few weeks of fights between the Nazi government and a regular Reichstag, with communist deputies and social democrats, would have left an impression on the people. Maybe Hitler wouldn't have had the kind of popularity in 1934/35 that he had historically - he would have to push his agenda more openly, without useful pretexts like the Reichstag fire, and less people would have swallowed his lies.

Given how successfull the Nazis were in the remaining years before the war, however, it's unlikely that major changes would have resulted. The olympic games, the economic recovery, the scrapping of Versailles - all largely unaffacted by the way Hitler grabbed power. But you never know... butterflies...
It certainly is amazing how soon after Hitler came to power that the fire took place...

It seems a little too amazing to me...

It certainly follows the M.O. of Hitler to have started it (Ernst and the brown shirts)...
__________________
It is my opinion that the use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender...
My own feeling was that in being the first to use it, we had adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages. I was not taught to make war in that fashion, and wars cannot be won by destroying women and children..."

Admiral William D. Leahy
Krivitsky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2006, 16:26   #7
Tskb18
General
 
Tskb18's Avatar
EU3 OwnerHoI AnthologyEU3 Complete
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,346
"I only hope," Rosenberg said gloomily, "that this is not the work of our chaps. It's just the sort of damn silly thing some of them might do!"

http://www.seftondelmer.co.uk/reichstag-fire.htm
Tskb18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:54.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Copyright 2001-2009 Paradox Interactive