OK, here we have suggestions for Central Asia, mostly contributed by Aetius, so let's give a big hand to him:
Yes, precisely. I would suggest roughly half as many provinces in the areas north of Persia. I don't know exactly how they should be condensed, but I know that empires in this area should rise quickly and fall quickly, and that suggests really big provinces.Yakman said:I think larger territories in Turkestan would be a good thing. After all, whenever military action occurred there, huge chunks of territory changed hands.
Garbon said:I must agree that they are way too many small provinces on this map.
Afghanistan simply does not need to be so detailed.
I was waiting how long you guys would take until you spotted that ^_^ I didn't think Baluchistan was adequate as it was too big compared to the province in question.Cagliostro said:I have to agree on less detail as you approach Siberia. These were fairly empty chunks of land that changed hands a number of times.
Also, is "Baluchichunk" really the correct name? It sounds hilarious to me, like a chunk of Baluchi.
I don't really have the expertise to suggest specifics. I can say things like "combine Tashkent, Soghd, Talas, and Chui into one province", but I really don't know if that is the most logical consolidation. All I know is that gameplay concerns demand far fewer, larger provinces.Aetius said:Make change suggestions i.e. merge province A with province B. The map is in no way perfect, but without knowing what exactly needs to be changed its a bit difficult discuss the merits of each change.
doktarr said:I don't really have the expertise to suggest specifics. I can say things like "combine Tashkent, Soghd, Talas, and Chui into one province", but I really don't know if that is the most logical consolidation. All I know is that gameplay concerns demand far fewer, larger provinces.