Simply put, their policies are confused, contradictory, and overall dangerous in these times. Whereas I would rather have peace and negotiation with all nations, and von Ritter war with them all, both Hensdale and Terrance want to appeal to all sides in American politics, which will only result in such a confused foreign policy, it will damage our relations for decades to come.
Mr. Terrance will almost certainly bring us into the conflict, since we'd be so heavily aligned to the Western powers. His policies would bring us to war with Germany, Austria, and Russia, and this conflict will rage for many years. However, his Latin policy is far better than Mr. Hensdale's.
Mr. Hensdale, though, shows yet another weakness. He seeks to hide from the other European states, and to align us, foolishly, to only Britain. Once this war begins, we will be drawn in, or we shall leave Britain out to dry, ruining our relations, regardless of his intentions. The war will ruin our European ties permanently under his administration. And his Latin policy is little better, since he views South America as our playground, and should follow our ideals to the letter.
My policy on Europe is the most different, and the best placed to have America in a strong position. My policies will free us from a solely Anglo-centric view, while still supporting free trade and other benefits from the Commonwealth, only without them being bound to aid us, and for us them. As well, since my policy will focus on remaining neutral, and attempting to negotiate the differences and conflicts between the two sides in Europe. Should a war erupt, America would serve as a mediator, a diplomat, to restore peace. Concerning Latin America, I would reopen relations with them, and work to bring them closer to us, not through diplomatic or through militaristic channels, but through trade, commerce, and the free exchange of ideas.