It may be worth it to move those spaceports ASAP, since spaceports improve cargo handling times they may be better used on a place that is more of a hub in our economy.
Like PDCs and Academies, Spaceports cannot be moved.
It may be worth it to move those spaceports ASAP, since spaceports improve cargo handling times they may be better used on a place that is more of a hub in our economy.
Like PDCs and Academies, Spaceports cannot be moved.
Like PDCs and Academies, Spaceports cannot be moved.
PDCs can be prefabricated and assembled somewhere else...
...although I'm not sure whether you can dissassemble them and move them again.
Sorry, using destroyer as the size classification here.Very long-range active sensors (like the 993 m-km sets in the Blinks) are terribly expensive in displacement... putting them in a Destroyer would cripple its functionality in nearly every other respect. It could than carry almost nothing in terms of armor, shields, weapons and fire control. In what sense would it still be a "Destroyer"? Best to keep Battle Management ships as a seperate class until we have the tech to make active sensors that are both very long range and quite compact.
Well, you know the salvos they fired, you should have some idea of how the CIWS systems and armour plating of your fleet ships compare to the Rocks..The problem there is that there is only one way to find out what sort of damage we would have taken from an enemy missile salvo that gets past the Rocks. That's by actually taking the damage.
Having the enemy fire at your battle fleet doesn't typically translate as losing a battle. Although it IS generally a prerequisite, true.Again I must remind people that as long as the Prix move at double our movement rate, there is no such thing as a minor defeat... if we start losing a battle, we face total destruction of the entire fleet, since it is simply not possible for us to disengage from a losing battle.
Team them up with a battlecruiser for "presence" purposes, possibly after a bit of a redesign?So... What should we do with the Mountain-II class Light Carriers once the Constellation class Fleet Carriers are fully on-line? Six Constellations can carry over 350 Fighters between them. Should we convert the Mountains to FAC carriers? To Assault Carriers (carrying small, fast Drop-Ships for planetary invasion by Marines)? Or keep them as Light Carriers for Fighters?
So... What should we do with the Mountain-II class Light Carriers once the Constellation class Fleet Carriers are fully on-line? Six Constellations can carry over 350 Fighters between them. Should we convert the Mountains to FAC carriers? To Assault Carriers (carrying small, fast Drop-Ships for planetary invasion by Marines)? Or keep them as Light Carriers for Fighters?
Sorry, using destroyer as the size classification here.
How big are your blinks then, anyway?
Well, you know the salvos they fired, you should have some idea of how the CIWS systems and armour plating of your fleet ships compare to the Rocks..
And that still doesn't answer the question on whether the Prix could/would have reached the fleet (and that you should be able to estimate from the (estimated) dispositions at the time it must've fired at the Rocks)
Having the enemy fire at your battle fleet doesn't typically translate as losing a battle. Although it IS generally a prerequisite, true.
I really like the assault, marine ship idea. Sounds cool. Do we need to add FAC? the fighters are filling that niche quite well, but we do lack drop ships, and smaller fast drop ships could also be used for boarding of crippled vessels. So that idea is by far the coolest one.
I really like the assault, marine ship idea. Sounds cool. Do we need to add FAC? the fighters are filling that niche quite well, but we do lack drop ships, and smaller fast drop ships could also be used for boarding of crippled vessels. So that idea is by far the coolest one.
What kind of modifications would be needed to the mountains for that anyway? Does it even require any modifications at all? Does it need something other than just a sufficiently sized hangar deck?
True, but my point is that we should run dangerous experiments when we have little other choice, or when the detachment present at the battle is already obsolete and about to be replaced. It seems irresponsible to me to run dangerous experiments just in order to see what happens.
Maybe keep 3 Mountains as FAC carriers and the others as dedicated Assault Carriers?
I thought drop ships were dedicated ship components.The Drop Ships loaded on the Assault Carriers would be purpose-built FACs. That would give the Assault Carriers the flexibility of being able to off-load their Assault FACs and reload with Bombardment FACs or Air-Superiority FACs instead, if desired.
I thought drop ships were dedicated ship components.
I'm partial to ForzaA's idea of sending the outdated carriers to colonial stations at the far reaches of the empire, showing the flag and serving as a QRF, while the battle fleet can be sitting pretty on Earth until something serious erupts.