The Industrial Revolution though, is a great example of individual innovation. The British problem is that ti still constricts its economy too greatly. That is not to say that I don't see your point, but would the problem be at all alleviated by government intervention? No, because the government must acquire money from either the backs of the poor or the banks of the rich. From the poor, it would only harm those it was intending to help, and would make them reliant on the government, not themselves, the opposite of liberty. To tax the rich would make them less competitive and would lead to monopolies and unemployment, further hurting the poor.
The industrial revolution is not perfect, no, but it has lead to European dominance economically, and that is what we're striving for. Furthermore, America has little problem with unemployment, seeing how so many people immigrate to her.
But, ultimately, regulations harm the very people they intend to protect, and high taxes infringe on the individuals right to property, a tenant of liberalism, freedom, and this nation!
Senator Henry J. Jarvis of California, Champion of the Constitution and Republican Candidate for President
The industrial revolution is not perfect, no, but it has lead to European dominance economically, and that is what we're striving for. Furthermore, America has little problem with unemployment, seeing how so many people immigrate to her.
But, ultimately, regulations harm the very people they intend to protect, and high taxes infringe on the individuals right to property, a tenant of liberalism, freedom, and this nation!
Senator Henry J. Jarvis of California, Champion of the Constitution and Republican Candidate for President