I am... wary of this bill; while I see many merits, especially in assuring that widows will receive benefits, and supporting education for our soldiers, that the government would now go more into the business of providing healthcare for individuals is most worrisome; furthermore, I believe this bill needs to be better defined. Will the 50% pay for the families continue for all time, for a standard amount, or for the length of the soldiers service? Where will the funds for this healthcare and education support come from? Will we be forced to raise taxes, as we are set to do in 1947? Or are going to reduce Research and Development, or possibly other social programmes? How will the government ensure that these soldiers are employed, especially as the war draws down, and the need for certain jobs disappear entirely?
Indeed, this seems to be little more than a vast expansion of government, sugar-coated as a means to aid our soldiers, which no honourable person could dare oppose! The Departments of Labour, Public Works, and Defence will all have to expand drastically to oversee these new roles properly; that., combined with the obvious expansion of spending from the other portions of the bill, would likely strain our economy, especially with a tax increase (which would obviously harm the poorest members of our society, and help stagnate business growth) on the horizon. To simultaneously increase taxes and spending is simply an unwise move, especially since our economy is still not fully recovered (this war has created no real growth, and if we are not careful, we will experience another recession once the war economy is drawn-down).
In other news, I will be glad to attend the Congresswoman's wedding, if my schedule permits.