Yes, something like in battle description on wikipedia, a column based view could look more clear...
For illustration, it could look something like this>>
Yes, something like in battle description on wikipedia, a column based view could look more clear...
For illustration, it could look something like this>>
One thing nobody seems to have pointed out on the "columns" bandwagon
Doesn't that thing just give way too much information unless you have perfect intel? Especially the number of actual men in fighting condition seems to be out of place!
But yes, organizing things in columns is goodness. And the totals should be in the beginning..
I still think if you attack somewhere with a seizable stack the window will be overcrowded with division names included, even with separate columns.
It's not even useful information, because the names will often be in languages you don't speak anyway.
How many of the divisions are infantry, artillery, armor and so on would be more interesting to know (for those of us who don't get counters).
Yes, something like in battle description on wikipedia, a column based view could look more clear...
For illustration, it could look something like this>>
instead of the Johan's>>
Yes, something like in battle description on wikipedia, a column based view could look more clear...
For illustration, it could look something like this>>
instead of the Johan's>>