• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Status
Not open for further replies.
There's no fingerpoint, only facts. It's simple: The Young Anarchists were established, justified and protected by the Anarchists. Obviously, Anarchists do this when they weren't busy demanding the heads of the Marxists and the overthrow of rightfully elected goverments.

No, Anarchists aren't moderate. They are one of the radical factions of the Republic, a quite warmongering one.

I quote myself to not fall in the "Last Post of the Page" curse. :p
 
I call for the creation of the Luxemburgist Faction!

A faction that takes the Marxist stance on economics, and a Anarchist stance on voting rights, freedoms, etc!
 
There's no fingerpoint, only facts. It's simple: The Young Anarchists were established, justified and protected by the Anarchists. Obviously, Anarchists do this when they weren't busy demanding the heads of the Marxists and the overthrow of rightfully elected goverments.

Fingerpoint, angry comment, whatever. The point I'm trying to make is that this is the number-one hatred thread (in-character hatred, of course! ...I hope...) on the entire forum, and everyone likes to throw around what everyone labels as "facts". I'm not arguing any ideology: only that everyone likes to hate on everyone else here, and they will use any opportunity they get to make the other side look evil and sinister, with legitimate facts or not.

EDIT: Also, I ment the moderate Anarchists; obviously, there are those that are out of control and call for unjustified violence (coughEnewaldcough), but there are also those that don't. Communard is a good example.
 
I call for the creation of the Luxemburgist Faction!

A faction that takes the Marxist stance on economics, and a Anarchist stance on voting rights, freedoms, etc!

I'm sure Tommy will work it in eventually considering his earlier admission to admiring Rosa.

Fingerpoint, angry comment, whatever. The point I'm trying to make is that this is the number-one hatred thread (in-character hatred, of course! ...I hope...) on the entire forum, and everyone likes to throw around what everyone labels as "facts". I'm not arguing any ideology: only that everyone likes to hate on everyone else here, and they will use any opportunity they get to make the other side look evil and sinister, with legitimate facts or not.

EDIT: Also, I ment the moderate Anarchists; obviously, there are those that are out of control and call for unjustified violence (coughEnewaldcough), but there are also those that don't. Communard is a good example.

I don't think you should just generalize that "everyone likes to hate on everyone else". Politics will naturally draw people to undertake err questionable acts of passion. As you pointed out Communard and many others try to take a calm and rational approach to things :)
 
Last edited:
Fingerpoint, angry comment, whatever. The point I'm trying to make is that this is the number-one hatred thread (in-character hatred, of course! ...I hope...) on the entire forum, and everyone likes to throw around what everyone labels as "facts". I'm not arguing any ideology: only that everyone likes to hate on everyone else here.

Labels? You only need to read the AAR updates about Young Anarchists murdering people and threatening Blanqui with death or the comments of Anarchists forumites about new "revolutions" in order to annihilate Marxists. BTW, the ones who started this hate where the Anarchists.

PS: And my post wasn't angry. The message was simple: Anarchists aren't moderates.
 
Labels? You only need to read the AAR updates about Young Anarchists murdering people and threatening Blanqui with death or the comments of Anarchists forumites about new "revolutions" in order to annihilate Marxists. BTW, the ones who started this hate where the Anarchists.

PS: And my post wasn't angry. The message was simple: Anarchists aren't moderates.

Oh, for god's sake. I think you understand what I mean without me needing to break out the thesauras and conjure up 500 different words in order to satisfy you.
 
Brothers of the 1848 revolution, (who voted anarchist)
Have you already forgotten our goals of world socialism in our brief moment of triumph? Have you forgotten that Socialism is an unceasing revolutionary force? currently sweeping the German lands with the speed of a hurricaine and the force of a thunderbolt? How can we rest on our laurels when so little has been accomplished?

We must seize the initiative and unite the German peoples under socialism, we must depose the ruling class by force, first Germany, then Europe, then Russia, the Americas, the Orient, we shall not rest until the entire world is free of the bourgeoisie and united under world socialism, to accept nothing less is to reject the very tenets Socialism is based on, to reject what our fellow brothers have fought and died for!

World socialism will not be achieved through strengthening the power of the unions and the bourgeoisie, but through Iron and Blood! Repent either now my "brothers" or repent at the gallows!

Also, I looked back, and it was actually Tanzhang's comment which was the first to really "bash" another faction. So, no, the Anarchists didn't start the hate. :p

EDIT: I just noticed this, but Tanzhang was actually also the first person to actually make a DEATH THREAT.
 
Last edited:
How young and innocent this thread was back then. :p

Back when people thought you could simply outline your own position and get support on the merits of your own policies rather than the issues with your opponents'. :rolleyes:

They sure were simpler times.
 
Silly, silly coalitions. It seems that factional politics has taken over our nation and has now brewed a civil war. These are bad times, indeed.

OOC: As a fun fact, I will probably jump ship again :D
 
I did rather like it better back then. I suppose the in-character hate between pretty much everyone sort of gives a bit of life to the thread, but really, it would be so much nicer if you didn't have 20 people breathing down your neck whenever you make a comment supporting or disapproving of a certain faction's policy for something.
 
Fingerpoint, angry comment, whatever. The point I'm trying to make is that this is the number-one hatred thread (in-character hatred, of course! ...I hope...) on the entire forum, and everyone likes to throw around what everyone labels as "facts". I'm not arguing any ideology: only that everyone likes to hate on everyone else here, and they will use any opportunity they get to make the other side look evil and sinister, with legitimate facts or not.

But I'm not trying to make others look evil or sinister? :confused:

Or am I? :eek:
 
I did rather like it better back then. I suppose the in-character hate between pretty much everyone sort of gives a bit of life to the thread, but really, it would be so much nicer if you didn't have 20 people breathing down your neck whenever you make a comment supporting or disapproving of a certain faction's policy for something.

Your calls to return to an earlier and less perfect revolution are revanchist and counterrevolutionary. They endanger our republic and the ideals of the revolution. Reform or face the consequences.

:p
 
Your calls to return to an earlier and less perfect revolution are revanchist and counterrevolutionary. They endanger our republic and the ideals of the revolution. Reform or face the consequences.

:p

:eek: How did you know I was planning to destroy the republic from the inside-out by returning to earlier, less revolutionary days!? Curses, if it weren't for those meddling proletariots...

EDIT: Huh, funny, I guess it was me who travelled back in time and caused that White uprising, all that time ago earlier in the thread, wasn't it? :p
 
Tommy, how are you outputting those maps of the commintern by the way? The ones that show all the provinces? I do hope you aren't having to manually colour each one.

Also regarding maps, could you show a normal one? I'm slightly curious as to the state of the outside world. :)
 
Well, you look at a party and it's platform, and then it's forced to ally with another party whose platform you didn't like, so you pretty much have to consider the platform and issues of the other parties when you vote. That was easier with the old system before the assembly.

I'm putting my hopes into Rosa sweeping in and brining some well-needed order AND justice to the Republic.

Oh, and I definately like the CSR! Made me think of when I played Byzantium and had a revolution; it styled itself the Union of Red Themes.
 
See my worst nightmare has come true the Anarchists come to power, and what do we get: two strikes with no resolutions, the complete collapse of a perfect ecinomy, a floundering external politics, evil fascists entering our noble realm, next to no political promises kept, and a civil war the likes of which we have not seen since Blanque's days. If the masses have some sense this will be the one and only Anarchist ruleing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.