Villagers, how can it not be more obvious than this that the wolves are playing you?
Why do you simply give them their win?
Why do you simply give them their win?
And now the votes seem to move too easily to Rysz. One of Wagon and Aedan should be a wolf, yet they both switched at the same timestamp, presumably Aedan couldn't see Wagon's vote.
Nevertheless, this is what I have to stick with. If Ironhead turns out to be a wolf, well played to him. I still think, all things considered, he was a likely scan target first, that it did seem like him and madchemist were co-operating second, and the pms seem reasonably plausible third. He could be bad but that's simply not where the evidence is pointed. Alea Iacta Est.
This is nonsense though, and this will stand regardless of what your role is in half an hour. What on earth do you mean "too perfectly cleared"? We've only see one wolf. There has only been one day of voting on which to look good. Ironhead happened to look good on that day. I mean, I'm baffled by this, genuinely baffled. There hasn't been enough known wolves, and enough vote cycles involving wolves, for people to be incriminated much; only one day. That Ironhead happens not to have been incriminated that day, that that is somehow suspicious, is like the opposite of logic.No, I am not contradicting myself, you are missing my point. I point out that Iron is too perfectly cleared. Vote-wise he hasn't done anything wrong. That is very odd, as it is quite likely for any villager to accidentally make an incriminating vote as one doesn't know who the wolves are and who are not. We have one known wolf, and that was even on the first day, where there is almost none information at all. Also it is quite odd that there is not much information regarding votes to go by. No-one is really cleared by that. How convenient.
This would certainly lose the village the game and you know it. If the villagers do not unite together, the wolves snipe to victory. Again. telling villagers to vote independently of each other makes no sense from a villager perspective.So just vote who you think is a likely wolf, and let's just see what would happen. Vote what you believe, and not what you believe others might vote. Other than oneself, 50% of the rest of the village is wolf. Do you really want to go looking what the others are voting?
This is nonsense though, and this will stand regardless of what your role is in half an hour. What on earth do you mean "too perfectly cleared"? We've only see one wolf. There has only been one day of voting on which to look good. Ironhead happened to look good on that day. I mean, I'm baffled by this, genuinely baffled. There hasn't been enough known wolves, and enough vote cycles involving wolves, for people to be incriminated much; only one day. That Ironhead happens not to have been incriminated that day, that that is somehow suspicious, is like the opposite of logic.
This would certainly lose the village the game and you know it. If the villagers do not unite together, the wolves snipe to victory. Again. telling villagers to vote independently of each other makes no sense from a villager perspective.
I really hope you're a wolf, Rysz, because I don't believe a villager could make a defence this poor, and illogical.
Rysz, you're talking as if this has been happening over many days. It hasn't. It was one single day. Ironhead's voting record is not "too perfectly cleared". Not even remotely. It is merely slightly better than some other peoples'.And what I mean with too perfectly cleared, I keep being reminded to a series or movie I saw where a candidate was so perfect for a job/task, no mistakes, never a flaw in his work history "dotted all the i's", that he must be an infiltrant. Which he was.
What I mean is that Iron is a master in shaping the circumstances and giving himself such a nice good record that he can take the entire village on a wild goose chase for the entire game.
While I appreciate the flattery, I think I've only ever won one game -- back in 2006, I think.What I mean is that Iron is a master in shaping the circumstances and giving himself such a nice good record that he can take the entire village on a wild goose chase for the entire game.
While I appreciate the flattery, I think I've only ever won one game -- back in 2006, I think.
I did not expect to see a split vote today; whether Rysz is bad or not, I expect all wolves to follow the rest of the crowd, just so they don't get caught in an unsuccessful attempt to save a packmate. They can afford to lose one -- even two, if necessary -- and still win.
I'm comfortable with our vote today.
Oh well. At least I didn't play as badly as I5 or Rysz, but that's scant consolation. I cannot believe E_L allowed his packmates to try and sell him out so much.
I actually suggested sniping to tie you with Falc, and Aedan supported it. It was Ironhead that vetoed it, but you were that close to getting torpedoed that day. Still would have been an uphill battle to get the rest of the wolves though.That how I like to run wolf. Always be the first to draw attention, but not too much attention to your packmates. So when people go looking for links between you, they never find them.
I actually suggested sniping to tie you with Falc, and Aedan supported it. It was Ironhead that vetoed it, but you were that close to getting torpedoed that day. Still would have been an uphill battle to get the rest of the wolves though.