• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
A while back, I did try messing around with the Soviet theaters. I placed every troop (and a bunch in the Far East) in Eurasia under the single command of one theatre: the Western Front. Everything in the far east went under another theatre, and the remainder under a other (where the AI had placed its troops covering its southern borders). To counter this last one, I signed non-aggression pacts with everyone along the southern border (the UK, Afghanistan, the Chinese etc). I hoped to see a reinforced Western Front and a more aggressive Soviet AI.

When I next looked, they had set up about six or more theaters. Just cant help the AI sometimes :p Hopefully now, with the Japanese AI out the way (and apparently their hardcoded East first mentality) they will heavily reinforce the main front and screw me over ... I mean give me a better challenge :laugh:
 
Battle of Dnieper Bridgehead (8 March – 20 April)

During the planning of Case Büffel Bewegung, OKH envisioned that such a move would be a temporary one. The troops freed up from the east would be used to defeat the United Nations in the west. After which, Germany could concentrate her forces in the east to finally crush the Soviet Union. To be able to go on the offensive in the east again, bridgeheads across the major rivers would be required otherwise many men would be lost in river-crossing operations, seriously slowing down progress and allowing the Soviets to move in reserves that had seen time and again in previous campaigns. Two-thirds of the East Wall lay behind river lines; the remaining third was a series of sally-ports for future operations. In the Ukraine, the vast majority of troops were positioned on the western bank of the Dnieper River. The exception was eight divisions manning the Dnieper Bridgehead: a fortified region on the eastern bank.

Following the withdrawal, the Red Army advanced cautiously slowly edging up the new frontline. Aerial reconnaissance identified streams of Soviet men, vehicles, guns, and tanks all moving east. There was little indication where the Soviets would strike, but it was clear they would. As the ground forces assembled, the Red Air Force moved their planes forward to fields closer to the front. Our jet fighters ambushed several relocating Soviet squadrons and intercepted a Soviet bomber wing that had evaded earlier patrols and had conducted a raid upon the Reich (a first for the Soviets).

woEVtDN.jpg

The Dnieper Bridgehead, following the withdrawal and before any fighting.
Inserts: Infantry, manning the limited fortifications that had been assembled in this area, scan the horizon for the advancing Soviet forces.​

On 8 March, the Soviets played their hand. The quiet night was broken by the screeching of rockets and the booming of artillery guns, the black horizon lit up and the frontline erupted in explosions, fire, and death. The Red Army was launching a full scale assault on Khorol, one of the weakest points on the entire frontline. As the barrage flattened the forward outpost line, Soviet engineers moved forward to breach the minefields and wire. By dawn, Soviet infantry had penetrated into the trench network and were fighting their way towards the second line and the artillery positions. By the 10th, Khorol had been lost and its garrison was fleeing to the protection of nearby units.

As the Red Army had been prosecuting its attack, the order had been given for the Fourth and Sixth SS Panzer armies to counterattack. The two armies had to spread out to reinforce the rest of the bridgehead, to bolster the line against a buildup of Soviet forces, while also conducting a counterattack to retake Khorol. As panzergrenadiers seized trenches and began the process of pushing forward to where the front had been, additional divisions launched attacks into Soviet territory to rout their opposing forces. Over the course of the following five days, several Soviet divisions were routed on the flanks of the battlefield and Khorol was retaken.

pkM0Vly.png

Khorol, after it had been retaken.
Inserts: Infantry rest in shallow trenches during the counterattack, and watch as the artillery hits Soviet positions.​

It was a short-lived victory. Fresh Soviet troops pressed into the area and threw back the panzergrenadiers and Waffen-SS soldiers. By the 19th, Khorol was once again in Soviet hands. Over the course of the following days, the Soviets launched additional attacks upon the bridgehead. Despite the best efforts of our troops, sector by sector of the bridgehead was captured until it had dwindled to a mere two provinces. Additional static divisions – the only reserve forces nearby and available although lacking artillery - were rushed to the area to take up positions on the west bank of the Dnieper to ensure the Soviets did not cross. This influx of troops, coupled with the presence of the two worn out panzer armies deterred any further major attacks. However, minor assaults were launched throughout most of April.

N1FEjMY.png

The front, following the final Soviet attacks.​

In Estonia, a coup was launched that overthrew our fascist puppet regime. In their place a mixture of fascists from the previous regime and more democratic politicians took over. They appealed for a ceasefire with all parties, and such a diplomatic move was granted. No doubt, if the Soviets approach their border, such gestures will be ignored and they will find no help given from the Reich. Rather than waste troops combating the Estonians to reinstall our own regime, leading to unnecessary bloodshed for our own troops, troops were dispatched to the capitals of our other puppet regimes (Lithuania, Latvia, Belarus, and Ukraine) to ensure that they did not follow suit: a move that could result in the collapse of the entire Eastern Front.

Behind the front, the troops freed up from the withdrawal to the East Wall were reorganized into new combat formations. The Second Army was reformed and dispatched to reinforce Army Group North, where Soviet patrols had started to raid our lines. The Tenth Army (once the largest in the Reich, but now scaled down to the size of other formations) was dispatched to reinforce the line near the Dnieper Bridgehead. Out of the remaining troops, the Fifth and Sixth armies were reformed and dispatched to the Western Front.

By 20 April, Tenth Army had arrived on the front and the fighting for the remaining sectors of the Dnieper Bridgehead had come to an end. The Fourth and Sixth SS Panzer armies were withdrawn from the line. Once beyond the front, their men and materials were placed upon trains for the west. The back and forth fighting in the bridgehead had cost the lives of close to 28,000 men and numerous tanks. Soviet losses were estimated to be in the region of 25,000 men, adding to the evidence that their military was becoming more tactically competent. A propaganda coup was, however, scored: adding to the theme of the invading Asiatic hordes, which the propaganda ministry had been so keen on building, Korean troops had been engaged and killed (around 1,500 of them). In the air, 200 Soviet fighters and close to 300 bombers had been destroyed for the loss of a mere 72 of our jets.
 
Last edited:
Losing provinces and casulties of 28,000 Germans for 25,000 Soviets isn't a recipe for success.


Do the Ukrianians have any forces at the front? Releasing them earlier may have allowed them to be of better service to you.
 
I was weary of doing so early, only because I was using so much IC in upgrading my airforce. I didn't want to lose the IC of the few built up Ukrainian cities. At the moment, they only have a few divisions. Hopefully, I can hold the line long enough to allow my puppets to build up their forces.
 
Who was behind the coup in Estonia? How is that even possible, they were a member of Axis, right?
Also dear lord, you have fortified provinces, how can the enemy just rush over those? :eek:
 
Do puppets start with your techs? Otherwise their forces would be next to useless.

If only at least one of those fronts could be eliminated, you'd have enough forces to steamroll the remaining enemies.
 
Who was behind the coup in Estonia? How is that even possible, they were a member of Axis, right?
Also dear lord, you have fortified provinces, how can the enemy just rush over those? :eek:
If it's only level 1 or 2, the bonus isn't that huge.

When the Estonian coup happened, an event popped up saying the "opposition managed to overthrow the puppet regime and declare independence". I don't know if this was someone's (Allied AI?) doing, but it has a Nationalist Socialist country with democratic politicians in charge except for the HOS and HOG roles. I know I thwarted ones in Belgium and the Netherlands, earlier in my game, but I was under the impression that was because they were losing their colonial possessions and their NU was dropping. Near the beginning of my game, I managed to overthrow the French government using spies (although that did little to help) but I don't recall a message like that popping up. So, I am not sure what on to be honest.

As for the forts, Garfunkel has it. When I looked where I wanted to retreat I didn't really take an extensive look at all the forts. I saw some level 5 and 7s and stupidly assumed it was all the same until I actually checked. Where this battle took place, was one of the less developed areas. They were all level 1 or 2. So, I have a chunk of my IC now devoted to bringing up the line to a decent level (at least level 4 across the length of the line).

Do puppets start with your techs? Otherwise their forces would be next to useless.

If only at least one of those fronts could be eliminated, you'd have enough forces to steamroll the remaining enemies.

I had a quick check, my new puppets appear to have the same tech as I do. Now if they mass produce some troops ...

As for the last line, that's the plan. The next update will detail the situation on the Western Front and ideas to overcome.
 
you really need to throw the Allis from Europe very soon
 
Agreed. France needs to be swept clear. The Italian front can be held with relatively few forces, so I'd suggest turning east afterwards.
 
Hey guys, i have had to take my laptop into the shop for repairs. So, don't know when I will be getting it back or able to post a proper update.

As for France, from memory I have assembled between 80 and 90 divisions in France (excluding those manning the frontline). The AI has something like 250 (at least) divisions in France. There is a large concentration of around 80-100 divisions in Lower Normandy or facing the places like Arras poised to strike into the Pas de Calais. The second largest concentration of troops is on the straight section of the front south of Paris, and the smallest (from what I am able to tell) is assembled around the bulge in the line (the one formed from the fighting in Burgundy). I will probably end up repeating this info, with some graphics, when I get my computer back and write up the AAR.

My plan thus far, is to punch west out of Paris (since there is no river to impede my attack) then turn north to isolate and destroy the large force of AI troops mentioned above. If that succeeds, I can bring forward the troops manning the frontline and hopefully retain most of my offensive strength (probably in the region of 70 divisions) and turn south to take on what is left. It is all or nothing, if it goes wrong (ala the Ardennes Offensive) I guess it might be time to pull back to the West Wall.
 
Case Derfflinger: planning and preparation

In an attempt to place the Reich in a better strategic situation and before the arrival of millions of additional UN and Soviet troops from Asia, OKW decided to undertake a West-first policy. In accordance with this, the Luftwaffe transferred all its aircraft to within striking distance of UN lines and the two eastern panzer armies were likewise ordered west. This, along with freed up infantry from the east would provide OB West with a substantial force to strike at the UN lines and inflict a decisive defeat.

By May, eighty-five divisions had been assembled in France for the upcoming offensive, not including those already manning the frontline. The five panzer armies (52 divisions in total) had been concentrated for the attack. Twenty-five infantry divisions, coming from three armies, along with 3 airborne and 5 cavalry divisions had also been made ready for offensive action.

eyPcDIJ.png

May 1949: Western Front intel report​

During the course of the year, the Abwehr had made extensive efforts to identify the composition of the UN forces. Initial estimates had suggested a total of 173 UN divisions on the Western Front and further 13 in Italy. Of this sum, 117 had been identified in Lower Normandy and near the frontline that saw so much fighting during the winter. During April and May, American troop movements had been monitored: vast amounts of men and material were moving south. By 16 May, the Abwehr had identified 212 divisions on the Western Front: 89 based in Lower Normandy, 24 static divisions in Normandy, 41 divisions manning the sector south of Paris, a further 50 around the bulge, and an additional eight based behind the lines in reserve. However, the Abwehr did not believe this was the total force available to the United Nations.

With such a large concentration of UN forces north of Paris, it was decided that the immediate goal of the offensive would be to destroy this force using the might of the panzer armies and the Luftwaffe to crush them. Afterwards, a general offensive could be proposed to destroy the remaining troops.

4QrbOGY.png

Green: Planned routes of the main strike (with the intent on making a wide corridor, to avoid the problems of earlier encirclement battles).
Red: Planned secondary attacks to pin down UN forces​

The buildup of troops did not deter the UN. On 25 April, American troops launched a small scale raid, south of Paris, on the town of Melun. Over the course of the following four days, several thousand Americans were killed achieving very little in the process. This attack did little to impede the buildup of our forces. However, on 17 May a major UN attack was launched on Arras. This attack placed the offensive on hold, as a UN breakthrough would require the redeployment of numerous divisions to counter. By 22 May, American troops had breached the line and Canadian troops poured through. The UN use of Canadian troops seemed to be a repeat how the Canadians were employed during the First World War. Over the following two days, five divisions of Seventeenth Army counterattacked the Canadians. Arras was retaken. While the Canadians retreated, British troops advanced to cover their comrades. By 27 May, the UN attacks finally ended in failure. While their attack had failed on a tactical level, it had resulted in yet another strategic victory for the UN albeit a minor one. Five divisions from Seventeenth Army, who had been earmarked for the offensive, had been forced to man the frontline and thus rendered unable to be employed for offensive action least present a weakened Arras for the UN to attack once more.

By the end of May, the ground forces had assembled in their positions poised ready for action. Of the 3.5 million men within the ranks of the German military, 43 per cent had been placed under the command of OB West. Of this, over 50 per cent (787,000 men and over 5,000 tanks) had been assigned to the upcoming offensive.

MarjU9K.png

On the Eastern Front, the Soviets continued their liberation of abandoned territory while remaining passive along the frontline.
Towards the end of May, while ground forces advanced north into the Kola Peninsula, paratroopers landed to seize Murmansk.
U-Boats were immediately ordered to patrol in the region to intercept any Soviet convoys that may attempt to land supplies in the city.​
 
Only to what was seen in the "Case Büffel Bewegung" update: a line running from just east of Leningrad south along river lines and the Stalin Line, then down the Dnieper River. So everything east of that has been given up along with the Crimea.

I plan to hold that line. The Soviet AI did a good job in fortifying it, I now aim to improve upon that. I have my IC burning away at improving the fortification level along the line (bar the sections in Ukraine). I will hold this line, or bleed the Soviet AI when it punch through. My concern is that if they attack the Hungarian section (previous experience with the Hungarian troops was not that good), they will breech the line. That will result in the collapse of the Eastern Front as I would not be able to stop the penetration. But, I doubt it will come to that.
 
Note to all: all images are now back up. This problem, hopefully, shouldn't happen anymore as all new updates are being hosted by a different server.
 
I had hoped that you'd invest your IC in more divisions instead of only fortifications.

The plan for France seems feasible, although I am afraid that you will encounter problems eradicating the pocket as it does have access to ports. I'd also plan for one of the panzer armies to aid in holding the blocking corridor when the inevitable counterattacks come. That and the river line around the sector you plan to encircle will diminish the number of units you can employ against the UN forces.
 
Well, I can fortify the frontline faster than I can produce troops not to mention it is cheaper. A big offensive in the west is going to be costly and if I retake the offensive in the east, it will be even bloodier (at least 300k if I fight all summer and then some like earlier campaigns). I only have 500k left, which can quickly disappear so I have been a bit weary on churning out more divisions. I have enough to man the current frontlines and some reserves to react to problems. With that said, I am producing some troops. I completed several infantry divisions in '48, and have slowly been enlarging my mountain troops to cover the southern front (I upgraded my initial two divisions into true mountain divisions as half the brigades were regular infantry, and I have raised 4 more with an additional 2 on the way.).

I concur though on the tactical advise, and the problems posed by the river lines the AI is sitting behind. They are basically on an island. However, I have just secured air superiority (having played only a few days in advance) so I should be able to call upon the Luftwaffe to help me out crossing that river and breaking in. Not to mention I have a surprise up my sleeve for the AI, to be revealed in a later update.

Other than that, I feel my strategic choices in France are pretty much limited to what I have described (unless anyone can point out something I have missed). In the north, I can concentrate my troops in a single envelopment battle (although having to fight across the river lines to achieve this, as you have pointed out) and hopefully destroy a massive force on my northern flank that keeps trying to break through to the Pas de Calais. Or, I could fight it out in the center or south. Neither of which look any easier. I imagine I would need to launch a double envelopment battle if I was to do so (splitting my troops and diluting the attack) while pushing deeper into AI territory to net a major haul of prisoners, all the way having massive AI concentrations on both flanks and in the pocket rather than what will face me in Lower Normandy.
 
I like the plan and overall strategy. What you need in the east is not more TROOPS, but more DEFENSE. Those are not the same. Since manpower is (was, and ever shall be) Germany's weakness, it makes much more sense to increase Defensiveness with fortresses, rather than rare manpower. Remember, you're basically "buying" defensiveness with either manpower + IC, or just IC. Weigh the value - yeah, fortresses...

The Western plan looks good. Again, you need to destroy enemy divisions, not push them back - that will wear you down just as surely as doing so on the eastern front would. I'm just also concerned with the ability of the ai to pull out via the ports. That will result in an enormous strategic loss for you.
 
The plan for the West seems the only reasonable and available, but you need to avoid another Kaiserschlacht offesinve or it could be the last one of the War, like the first one was