• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Nah, Spain is doing its usual colonization of all of west africa and modena (after taking portugals west African colonies) went on a century long contest with england for domination of the west African coast. But I have Angola and Madagascar Randall of those colonies gave ivory or slave resources so I have no need to colonize further in the area
 
Nice little update, the REIC strategy is very clever, surely other Europeans aren't too happy they've basically set up a containment zone across the entire Indian Ocean? It might be okay in peace time but come war it could be incredibly dangerous.

Also an international intervention in China in the 1630s? Oh boy...
 
lordsoffrance4a.jpg

China in the 16th Century


map%20of%20china%20provinces.jpg

I figure it might be tough to remember Chinese province names so here’s a handy map


The Ming Dynasty began after the Hongwu Emperor won the civil war which followed the collapse of the Mongol Yuan Dynasty in the 13th century. Hongwu, an impoverished young man who had been raised by Buddhist monks because his parents could not support him, supported a return to an idealized version of the Chinese past, where a man could live and die within a small and supportive rural village. With this in mind, Hongwu created a set of revolutionary laws which disallowed movement between villages and which extracted massive amounts from those who made money via trading. Beyond this, Hongwu and his successors banned ocean travel and chose instead to invest in the Grand Canal which ran from the trading 'center’ around Suzhou and Shanghai to Beijing in order to keep the trading economy under control.


220px-%E6%98%8E%E5%A4%AA%E7%A5%96.jpg

The First Ming Emperor created the Ming dynasty based around a very specific social order which was being broken up by European involvement and the growth of a trade based economy


These controls soon broke down. The official population of China dropped and continued dropping over each Emperors reign. This was not due to drought or famine (though it was partially the fault of drought, famine, and the self imposed autarky which was official Ming policy), but rather due to families dropping under the radar in order to engage in trade. The Ming Dynasty was faced with a massive contradiction--inventions such as the metal printing press, the expansion of the silk trade, trade with foreigners, the massive influx of silver from foreign trade, and the building of the grand canal all created a huge amount of wealth, however the Ming’s ruling ideology, based around Confucianism, could not accept this new wealth.


220px-Ch%27iu_Ying_001.jpg

Late Summer in the palace of Hu Lei Wei. The creation of a nouveu riche aristocracy led to an obsession over the proper way that one could be wealthy


The old aristocrat-scholar class responded to this by creating an intricate array of ways to be ‘properly rich’. Those who were merely rich but did not own the right kind of plum tree, the right kind of silk clothing appropriate for the season and period, the right kind of late Song pottery, were tasteless fools who should be insulted. The nouveau riche, in a desperate play for social standing, bought each and every thing demanded of them, enrolled their children in private lessons of the Confucian classics in order to make their children bureaucrats (and thus put their children at the top of the social ladder). Thus the first journal printed in China was a feudal version of a ‘better living’ magazine, teaching people how to arrange their houses according to the proper principals.


Two centuries after Hongwu’s ascension to Emperorship, Ming China was a very different place. Economic activity, centered around Suzhou, was making still more scholar-aristocrats who were decrying wealth and the immorality of wealth. The decadence of mid-Ming China placed the 16th century into the typical middle period of a Chinese dynasty--soon, many thought, the corruption of the dynasty would reach a peak and the dynasty would collapse, either due to foreigners or internal rebels. While they were right, what replaced the Ming dynasty was very different than what China had experienced before.


220px-Ricci_Guangqi_2.jpg

Xi Guangqui, one of the most powerful bureaucrats of the Suzhou region, being converted by the Italian Jesuit Matteo Ricci


Southern China had always been a poorly administered area. Its distance from the capitol and its history of anti-government sentiment were both huge detriments to attempts by any Chinese government to pacify or even tax the area. Widespread tax evasion in the region was common--while excise taxes from the 1540s indicated that Canton had as large a population as Nanjing or Suzhou, the census showed that officially Canton had a population which was only one fourth of those cities. In truth, hundreds of thousands of people migrated south to trade in the lucrative markets of the Tonkin Gulf and the South China Sea, and Malaysia. And while some of those who traded in these areas stayed there (thus the large Chinese populations in Malaysia, the Phillipines, Vietnam etc), many stayed in South China where they remained almost completely unnoticed by their government. This was, of course, until the Scandinavians showed up.


The Scandinavians came to China, first trading wares from the New World (Tobacco, potatoes, peanuts, silver) and from their own East Asian colonies, but soon they started trading in their own knowledge: that is, their knowledge of administration. With the acceptance of the Gonjin Emperor (and with the statement that they would not send any missionaries to China), the Scandinavians began ‘advising’ the governors of Guangzhou and Guangxi provinces in 1578. The Scandinavians created a tax agency (based off of the French innovation of tax farming) wherein men would buy the right to collect taxes in a prefecture. They would get ten percent of the proceed and the Scandinavians would get five. This led to a massive increase in the Ming Dynasty’s tax funds (just as the Mongol hordes to the north were beginning to threaten the border), and the Scandinavians were soon asked to provide their services to all provinces south of the Yangtze river.


allclaimshatched_zps2cd93172.png

Spread of Scandinavian influence. Note that the South China Company was not solely a Scandinavian endeavor--throughout its whole history it was a majority-Chinese operation. Thus we should not see the Four Kingdoms Era as only a product of colonization of riches or an invasion of Europeans into China: it was an invasion of European ideas into China.



While the Scandinavians for the most part stayed true to their promise of not prosthelytizing the Christian faith, the rise of Western-trained tax assessors led to a fundamental change in Chinese society all the same. Because one did not have to hold a degree to gain a tax assessing title, young southern Chinese aristocrats spent their time learning accounting and reading the new Western books which were pouring in by the hundreds of thousands. The mere fact that a generation of Chinese men were being raised not on the idea that their society was the Middle Kingdom between heaven and the rest of the world but rather that China had things to learn from the rest of the world was a revolutionary step in itself. But beyond that, the message of the books being published in the thousands by the mostly Western-dominated printing industry was radically different.


Both Western and Chinese histiography had been primarily cyclical in nature up until the Medieval era. During this time Christian historians attempted to reconcile the pagan belief in cyclical time with their belief in a timeline which moved around one point (the birth of Christ). What they ended up doing was creating a wholly different way of perceiving history--as a linear series of events moving towards the second coming. With the coming of the 17th century Descartes started changing this apocalyptic idea into one oriented around the coming of modernity--just as before the birth of Christ the world was fundamentally different than afterwards, before the Renaissance the world was pre-modern, afterwards it was modern.


images

”Wang Yi perceives the plane”. This drawing is incredibly significant because it is the first recorded Chinese drawing which used Renaissance-style perspective


These intellectual shocks over three generations completely remade southern Chinese society. Rather than seeing themselves as the margin of the Ming Dynasty, they started to think of themselves as the vanguard of a new future for China. Rather than wondering openly (as Northern Chinese did) what dynasty would replace the corrupt Ming, several separatist movements began fermenting in the Scandinavian-administered areas. Rather than accepting the newly forming ultra-Confucian ideology of their northern rulers, a syncretic religious movement involving a combination of Taoism, Buddhism, Confucianism and Christianity (known as the Four Ways Movement) arose in Canton and Suzhou.


Scandinavian colonialism was not accepted by everyone. In Yunnan province, the creation of a tax assessment firm led to widespread peasant revolts, and the anti-western Ultra-Confucian movement originated from there. Key to the movement was the idea that all foreign concepts (Buddhism, Christianity, ‘modernity’, commerce) occurred cyclically and were the reasons for dynastic change, thus if they were rooted out of Chinese society China would finally achieve eternal peace.


xunzi-271x300.jpg

Xunzi, one of the two ‘philosopher kings’ to emerge from the breakup of the Ming Dynasty, believed that all foreign influence was to be expunged from China if the region was to have true enlightenment and peace


While the Ultra-Confucian movement seemed conservative, in fact it was as revolutionary as the Four Ways movement. Both sought a break from the dynastic cycle by a massive change in Chinese society, and both shared a hatred of the current order represented by the backwards, corrupt Ming Emperor.


This conflict could have continued for a century underground and unheard of it weren’t for two related events which occurred in the 1620s: the rise of the Tianqui Emperor to the throne in Beijing, and the unification of the northern hordes under the Manchus.


The Tianqui emperor was only 15 when he became Emperor, his father (who had spent his whole life dealing with court politics in order to become emperor) having died a month after his ascension. Thus the Tianqui emperor was young, naive, and inexperienced in politics, and given this it makes sense that he soon fell under the sway of the courtly philosopher Fung Wei, a scholar-bureaucrat who followed the Ultra-Confucian movement. Fung Wei’s rise to the top of the Ming court led to the enactment of several horrifying and cruel policies, including 100% tax rates on non-peasants and non-bureaucrats and the deportation of centuries old Oriental Christian communities (who for the most part moved south to the areas administered by the Scandinavians). Furthermore Fung Wei’s government led a widespread attack on Chinese Buddhists (who had been the most supportive of the financial boom and Scandinavian administration).


220px-%E6%98%8E%E7%86%B9%E5%AE%97%E5%83%8F.jpg

The Tianqui Emperor presided over the last years of the Ming Dynasty’s dominance


Fung Wei was a pragmatist, and though he believed that the end goal of the Emperor should be the destruction of all foreign influence on China, he only made slow moves against the Scandinavians. Instead he brought China into a series of wars against Tibet (which ceased giving tribute during the many purges of Buddhist monasteries), over the period of 1617-1629. These wars led to the annexation of Tibet. They also led to the collapse of the Ming.


This was the period when the French East Indies Company began getting involved in the Chinese trade. Using diamonds mined from their Antartique colony and their own knowledge of administration, the French began entrenching themselves within the Zhejiang and Fujian provinces, and by 1630 the trade in silk worms had become key to the growth of French manufacturing (more on that in the next entry). France’s entry into China also had the effect of further radicalizing the Four Ways movement. The works of Henri II were translated (by St.Chamand and Henri themselves) into Min Chinese and published from the publishing houses in Fuzhou starting in 1627. These works (which were in and of themselves French recontextualizations of Chinese philosophy--which has been missed by Western historians but not by Chinese ones) deeply spoke to their readers throughout Fujian, offering a path by which they could synthesize the Christian thought they had been reading throughout their lives with older Daoist and Confucian philosophy.


220px-Nurhaci_image.JPG

Nuhrachi, unifier of the Manchu tribes and first Qing emperor


To the north, the Mongol tribes were united under Nuhraci of the Manchu hordes. Nuhraci, a Manchu who had acted as an officer in the Ming army, came to believe during a series of peasant uprisings that the Ming Dynasty’s time had come to pass. With this belief in mind, he gave up his position and moved back home. From there, he began unifying the tribes through war and diplomacy, enacting reforms along the way such as codifying the Mongol language and creating an elite standing army. By 1628 Nuhraci had united all the hordes and revoked his tributary status with China, thus leading them to war.


This war was short--most of the Ming Army was in Tibet and Nuhrachi’s cavalry based forces swiftly cut off the border garrisons and conquered the northern provinces of the Ming Empire. With the treaty of Liaoning, Nuhrachi was given control over sections of the great wall as well as the northern road to Beijing. Thus Nuhrachi declared himself Qing Emperor in 1629, shortly before his death.


220px-Liu_Zongzhou.jpg

Liu Zongzhou was the other great philosopher king of the age. A disciple of Yong Zicheng (the so called ‘master of the three ways’, who wrote syncretic works which combined Chan Buddhism [Chinese Zen], Daoism, and Confucianism, and who allegedly had also taught Joachim de Saint Chamand), Liu was the progenitor of the Four Ways school, which sought to combine Western philosophy with Yong Zicheng’s synthesis of Chinese thought.


This led to a very rapid destabilization. Fearing that the Scandinavians would assert control over their nominal administrative zone, Yunnan’s provincial governor and prominent ultra-Confucianist Xunzi declared himself the King of Dali in 1630, and before the Ming Empire could defeat this uprising they were attacked again from the north, losing Beijing and much of northern Han China.


Fujian and Zhejiang, the two most tolerant and pro-foreign provinces, were now disconnected from the Ming Emperor. This led to a deep quarrel between the more traditional Eunuch faction and Ming loyalists and the Four Ways students, who varied from French trained administrators and tax farmers to old hands like Liu Zongzhou. Liu and his followers won out, and the Eunuchs were cast out from the new Enlightened Kingdom of Min. Liu, who had been mayor of Fuzhou and had a great many connections with both the French and the Scandinavian East Indies Companies, knew that the Scandinavians would not be able to guard against a final Qing push south, and furthermore had seen the horrific corruption brought about by the Scandinavian’s recent pushes for ever more silver (both to fund a new army they were recruiting to defend their Chinese provinces, which they had increasing control over, and to fund their wars in German). With this thought out, Liu sent a request to Henri II in the year 1640, asking him to accept the Enlightened Kingdom of Min under France for the time being.


This would lead to the Four Kingdoms Era, a time during which China transitioned into open contact with the outside world. It would also, eventually, lead to massive changes in France itself.


Qing_zps53544e15.png

The collapse of the Ming Empire, and the situation in China during Qing’s declaration of war against the Scandinavians, French, and Ming in 1643
 
Well done on a very complex and interesting update. Part 2 should be fascinating.
 
Well, this is a fascinating and well-written update, as usual, but as a student of Chinese studies I have to offer some points of criticism:

1) The province map is a modern one, and both inaccurate in regards to names and size. '自治区' (zizhiqu) means 'Autonomous Area' and is a Communist-era term for the border regions with lots of minorities in them. Ming China, at least the historical version (I don't know about your game, of course), consisted of the Han-populated areas - essentially today's China minus Mongolia, Manchuria, Tibet, Taiwan and Xinjiang. Beijing, Tianjin, Chongqing and Shanghai are special cases now, cities subordinate to the central government instead of being part of a province. Also, parts of Hebei, Beijing and Tianjin were Zhili Province, while Liaoning was called Fengtian.

2) China already had a tax-system very similar to the one you describe as 'European innovation'. China never had (and still has no) village-level administration, the smallest level is county government. It was staffed by scholar-officials, the elite of the elite, those who have passed the imperial examinations. (one of the bigger problems later on was that population rose, but the number of graduates each year did not. This was not a new problem - Kaifeng, capital of the Tang dynasty, started with a mounted police force of 12 people. This was wholly adequate to the small market town it started out as, but when it was connected to the great canal and grew to 400.000 people, bureaucracy did not catch up and the police were still only 12 people...)
An official was sent to oversee an entire county (never in his native province, to prevent corruption - a tradition still practiced in contemporary China). He was paid by the imperial court, but his official salary was laughably small. Since he was in charge of tax and revenue collection, it was accepted and even expected of him to appropriate part of that money to pay for himself and his staff (made up of locals, to offset his deficiencies in local customs and dialects as a foreigner. They were not part of the official hierarchy, an official could hire as much assistants as his money allowed. This made their power entirely dependent on his favor). This system provided advantages to both the central government and the locals - with corruption as an integral part, it provided a convenient excuse for the removal of officials who grew too powerful or openly critical of the court. On the other hand, the official had to depend on the goodwill of the local elites for efficient government (and taxation), therefore preventing government oppression from becoming too hard.
Chinese feudalism did not have the concept of hereditary aristocracy Europe had, and the highest social ranks (apart from the imperial court, of course) were taken by those scholar-officials. For the great majority of the peasants, who were free land owners, this meant that tax always went to the central government, but they had the option to become quasi serfs and pay rent to the land owning gentry, which freed them from most tax obligations. During times of economic crisis and war, when the central government needed more money, many of them took this option.

3) Chinese historiography was not cyclical, it was - with the possible exception of Sima Guang - completely static. Its purpose was delivering moral and ethical lessons to the rulers of the day, not to accurately represent historical events. It believed not in facts, but in the necessity of a narrative, fitted to the social and moral norms of the time.

In contrast, you have described the social conflict between the literate classes and the newly (and often, obscenely) rich very well, much better and more concise than the textbooks I have read on the subject. There are more things, but I don't have the time to write them all down now. You have not seen the last of me! *twirls moustache*
 
I knew that someone would get me on something regarding this entry (as I'm only a new student of Ming era China). I'm glad that I haven't been accused of supporting colonialism (something that I worried about when I wrote the entry because I am depicting Scandinavian colonialism as being almost overwhelmingly positive).

The map was more to help people who were unfamiliar with the area remember the names of the provinces in question, like Fujian, Zhejing etc. I feel most people only know Beijing, Shanghai and Hong Kong plus a couple other province names when it comes to China (even I had to correct my spelling of Liaoning).

The innovations of the Scandinavians was twofold--I didn't want to go into it because it's not directly related to the focus of the AAR, that is, France. On the one hand, they allowed non-degree holders to become tax collectors, on the other hand they created a local level of government in the provinces they directly controlled (Hainan, Guanxi, and Guangdong). This local level government took the majority of the tax income, which solved the problem of all taxation occurring centrally while all spending was done locally.

Also while I agree that nominally China did not have an aristocracy (something I've argued about a lot on these forums), in practice most degree holders were the sons of degree holders, but even moreso I would say that what has interested me about Chinese feudalism and early capitalism is the huge number of parallels it has with European early capitalism. Both featured the idea of the ideal aristocrat/gentleman (Gentilhomme in France, Junzi in China) who had otherworldly capabilities. In both cases, the junzi/gentilhomme was of noble descent (junzi meaning lord's son, while gentilhomme being something that could only be accumulated over generations), which meant that what social mobility existed in these societies happened in families.

In my paper on the development of management thinking I argued that these two ideas (the upper classes having otherworldly abilities and the lack of personal social mobility) stopped management thinking from occurring explicitly until the 19th century. Part of the reason for this entry being so slow is I've been editing that paper so it can get published. Fingers crossed!

Good point on Chinese histiography I'm woefully ignorant of the topic. And thanks for calling me out!
 
I knew that someone would get me on something regarding this entry (as I'm only a new student of Ming era China). I'm glad that I haven't been accused of supporting colonialism (something that I worried about when I wrote the entry because I am depicting Scandinavian colonialism as being almost overwhelmingly positive).

Don't worry, I believe all readers of this AAR know the difference between an accurate portrayal of history (or alternative history, in this case) and an expression of approval for what happens within.

The innovations of the Scandinavians was twofold--I didn't want to go into it because it's not directly related to the focus of the AAR, that is, France. On the one hand, they allowed non-degree holders to become tax collectors, on the other hand they created a local level of government in the provinces they directly controlled (Hainan, Guanxi, and Guangdong). This local level government took the majority of the tax income, which solved the problem of all taxation occurring centrally while all spending was done locally.

Also while I agree that nominally China did not have an aristocracy (something I've argued about a lot on these forums), in practice most degree holders were the sons of degree holders, but even moreso I would say that what has interested me about Chinese feudalism and early capitalism is the huge number of parallels it has with European early capitalism. Both featured the idea of the ideal aristocrat/gentleman (Gentilhomme in France, Junzi in China) who had otherworldly capabilities. In both cases, the junzi/gentilhomme was of noble descent (junzi meaning lord's son, while gentilhomme being something that could only be accumulated over generations), which meant that what social mobility existed in these societies happened in families.

Yes and no - while the scholar-officials were mostly sons of other scholar-officials, this doesn't mean the reverse was also true: Just being a son didn't get you a posting, you still had to pass the imperial examination. Also, as I mentioned above, bureaucrats had to take on a staff (Tang China had about 20.000 officials. No, not in the imperial court. In total. The entire country). This staff was mostly made of local people who failed the examination, since you had to be impressively competent to even be admitted to it. So, in effect, the people who did the actual collecting already were non-bureaucrats.

Good point on Chinese histiography I'm woefully ignorant of the topic. And thanks for calling me out!

I'm always happy to contribute to such a great AAR. As for something different: Have you heard of legalism? Back in the day, when China was unified for the first time, there were two competing schools of thought.
Confucianism says basically this: People are inherently good. If they do bad things, it's because they lack a good ruler to show them the way. Laws are a sign of weakness, if you need them to solve conflicts, that means your ruler is incompetent, because there are no conflicts in society under a virtuous ruler who leads through the power of tradition. The ideal Confucian society has no laws, no social mobility, no progress and no change at all.
Legalism, on the other hand, says this: People are inherently evil. Only through harsh laws and unyielding enforcement of those laws can they be prevented from causing evil - the harsher, the better. Society is heavily militarized in order to enforce those laws, and tradition merely stands in the way of total law. All things that help the government are encouraged, including progress, reform and invention. Pragmatism is prevalent, there are no qualms about brutality. It's a kind of veeeeery early Fascism, really.

The Qin Dynasty adopted Legalism as their official philosophy, which contributed to their demise - a military unit being mobilized was unable to reach its destination in time due to bad weather, so it would be sentenced for desertion when they finally arrived (punishment: death), so they decided to rebel instead (punishment: also death, so they didn't care about the difference). Things snowballed from there, or at least that's how the story goes.

Maybe one of the new Four Kingdoms is interested in Legalist thought...
 
I have heard of legalism! I just hadn't thought of it much in the context of Ming China. I know that it did have a resurgence in the later years, but that would occur during the point of divergence in Chinese history. If we say that Taoism, Buddhism, Confucianism, Legalism, and Western thinking were all competing within China at the time, I can say that Ultra-confucianism is a combination of the more conservative aspects of Confucianism with a strong dose of Legalism. The form found in Yunnan is even more Legalistic. In the Ming Remnant, (which is essentially Tibet and Sichuan) is less Legalistic than the Kingdom of Dali, but just as intent on eliminating foreign elements (much of their budget was spent converting Tibet).

Qing is essentially unchanged from its historic position, it's just blocked from controlling the south and center of China.

Min is ruled by philosophers of the Four Ways movement, which I've given a lot of focus on (and will put focus on in the future!)
 
In game, I declared war on Ming the moment that Zhejiang and Fujian were cut off from the rest of their provinces and took them while Qing was taking the last of their territories. In narrative I thought that this would be unrealistic--my main issue in writing about China is that it just would not be possible to directly control such massive and populated areas in the 17th century. From this idea came Scandinavia's indirect administration and the Kingdom of Min.
 
In game, I declared war on Ming the moment that Zhejiang and Fujian were cut off from the rest of their provinces and took them while Qing was taking the last of their territories. In narrative I thought that this would be unrealistic--my main issue in writing about China is that it just would not be possible to directly control such massive and populated areas in the 17th century. From this idea came Scandinavia's indirect administration and the Kingdom of Min.

Well there is nothing more honourable in AARing to me than dressing game strategies in believable historical trappings. Whether talking game reality or alt-history a stable China in the future will be after the riches of the south once more. I imagine Henri's acceptance of Liu's offer will make France's involvement in the region a very long, drawn out affair. And all the better for my entertainment!
 
Well there is nothing more honourable in AARing to me than dressing game strategies in believable historical trappings. Whether talking game reality or alt-history a stable China in the future will be after the riches of the south once more. I imagine Henri's acceptance of Liu's offer will make France's involvement in the region a very long, drawn out affair. And all the better for my entertainment!

Indeed! And thank you for the compliment!

French China...very interesting.
Nice to see that the Chinese are still involved in the world

Yes, while it's always tough to devote a chapter to another region of the world (as the history hasn't been built up in my own mind), I couldn't avoid talking about the massive effects that Scandinavian and French colonization had on China. The Kingdom of Min has a huge part to play in Chinese history, and the idea of a China that modernized very early (and how such a modernization would come about) is interesting to me as someone who is interested in Chinese history.

Two notices, my dear readers: Firstly, I'm going to do something a bit "odd" with the next entry. I've felt the urge to get on with my history and advance France towards the Revolution, and I'm going to do so by writing the next entry in the voice of one of the major characters of the event. Also, despite the release of EU4 I guarantee to you guys that this AAR will remain running until either I or it are exhausted. I briefly considered switching the AAR over to EU4, but firstly too many odd things have happened in my game world to replicate in EU4, and secondly this AAR has always been as much a Magna Mundi AAR (and a Christmas Mo-Mod AAR) as much as it has been a historybook one, and it would feel like a betrayal of a mod I love so much to switch over.
 
Except from La Belgica, published in Bruges, 1754





The recent history written by Seigneur de Tocqueville, Souverains de France, would have the reader think that the only actions taken in our history were taken by Princes, Generals, high bureaucrats and Kings. He leaves but scant pages to the common man, even (insultingly) putting aside a chapter on the ‘great and successful’ history of his own family, as if describing the rise of a family from the upper gentry to the peaks of decadent wealth justifies his erasure of the lives of millions of peasants, artisans, and miners--the true history of France.


But in this series, which shall be published in the London Examiner, the Amsterdam Courier, and my own publication, La Belgica, I will do more than complain. I shall attempt to ‘fill the holes’ of de Tocqueville’s petty excuse for a history using the knowledge I have of my own area. I recommend my friends and my readers to add the histories of their own provinces to mine, in order to give our readers a more full understanding of the history of our land. I know that my friends in Le Quotidien Gascon and L'honnête Norman are contributing to this attempt, but I hope and I wish, dear readers, that my attempt will castigate you all to think critically and harshly of what we are told is the history of France.



lordsoffrance4a.jpg

The Scheldt River Valley and French early industry


What prompted Henri II, so known as a peacemonger and a coward, to send fifty brigades to an imperial war against as distant an enemy as the Ching Emperor? Why was the subjugation of Min perceived as such a necessity in the halls of the Louvre? To understand this, we must understand the degree which the kingdom of Henri invested in the silk industry, and the early history of the Scheldt river valley. We must also understand the unique situation of our land, the province of Flandres.


Flandres_zpsb7e8ece3.png

French Flandres, 1590-1630


Flandres has always been a unique province in the lands of France. Not a province of peasants and estates, Flandres has always been far more urban. And while other provinces of France boast hundreds of noble families who can date their histories to Charlemagne, the tumultuous history of Flandres led, at the rise of Henri, to a region with only 9 major noble families who owned a majority of lands along the Scheldt river, which is the liveblood of the region.


Outside of these massive lands, the proud cities of Ghent, Calais, Lille, and Bruges predominated. These cities were and are characterized by a distinct independence, a history of self government going back to the first millenia (self government which even the Perfect Autocrat, Louis XII, could not curtail!), and a great diversity even after the purges and horrors of Tilly. These cities were artisanal cities, where the guilds employed nearly half of the population. And unlike the luxury industries of Paris, these cities made durable, every day goods. Instead of tapestry, the Flemish guilds made woolen clothes; instead of wigs, the guilds made sturdy wooden furniture.


With the rise of Henri II and Saint Chamand’s reorganization of the regions of France, Flandres grew massively in size, gaining the provinces of Lille and Pas-de-Calais. More importantly, the governor of the Flandres province was put in charge of tariffs. Raymond de Neuville-Bruges a military officer who had grown fat from his shipbuilding companies, was appointed governor of our province in 1627.


Mercy.jpg

Raymond de Neuville-Bruges, the first governor of Flandres and, uniquely, the first aristocrat in France to gain legal control of a city


De Neuville-Bruges was the son of a major general in the Forty Years War. His father’s competence led to him gaining a title to the reclaimed Jewish quarter of Bruges, as well as a captaincy over the fortifications around the port of Wenduine. With his pension and money he extracted from the port, De Neuville-Bruges was able to found the Chevailler Shipping Company, which soon became the largest ship building company in France. With his prodigious riches, De Neuville-Bruges was able to buy his way into the governorship. With a salary amounting to one percent of all tariffs, De Neuville-Bruges soon became one of the richest men in France.


But this immense wealth was not enough. De Neuville-Bruges was put under continuous legal assault by the guilds of Bruges, who wanted to continue doing business under city law. In the case before the Flemish parlement of 1634, it was decided that so long as noble rule ‘benefitted the city’, De Neuville-Bruges’ illegal ownership of city land would be accepted. In the same year, the first shipment of silk worms came to Flandres.


silk_weaver.jpg

Silk weaving, which had once just been the province of Lyons, soon became the largest industry of Flandres and the greatest threat to the Flemish artisan


De Neuville-Bruges combined his domination of the silk trade with the huge amount of land he owned to create a series of silk operations aimed at the creation of massive amounts of raw silk textiles. These 'manufactories’ were capable of massive quantities of textiles. But beyond this, de Neuville-Bruges repurposed the ‘public’ lands of his estates, destroying the livelihoods of a huge number of peasants, who now had no choice but to work in the silk manufactories. Soon, a third of Bruges was employed in the silk trade.


But De Neuville-Bruges went further than that. Henri II’s early reign featured several massive canals projects aimed at supporting trade along the Seine. Using his influence in the Louvre and his massive supply of money, de Neuville Bruges built a series of canals along the Scheldt which connected the Bruges canal system to the river and connected the river to the Seine.


This allowed De Neuville-Bruges’ silks to reach as far as Paris and London. It also had another effect--nobles with lands along the Scheldt also reorganized their lands towards silk and linen production. New cities such as Neuchateau, Moreau, and Isle-de-la-Soie were built by these aristocrats-turned-businessmen. These men were not satisfied with merely dominating the courts, the arts, and the universities--they felt that they also deserved massive, decadent riches. Our province, our city, our world can now be said to have been built by these men.


Scheldt_zps77d2de2d.png

The new Scheldt canals, which connected Flandres to Paris, allowed for a massive accumulation of wealth to the noblesse. Having sullied their hands by stealing the wealth of their peasants, they were not satisfied with the old methods of production and the old protections given to their vassals.


This led, at the lowest scale, to an absolutism in the workshop. Just as the absolutism of Louis XII worked by shedding the responsibilities that the King had to the nobility, the new absolutism of the workshop shed the responsibilities the nobleman had to his subjects. Respect for precedent and law crumbled. Only power, and the lust for money, mattered.

This coincided with the massive rise of the Silks and Linens industry. Textiles--both made in mass in the manufactories and by master workers in the guilds--soon became the largest industry of the Flandres region, and through the rise of ship building in Bruges, these textiles were exported to London, Amsterdam, Hannover and Stockholm. By 1640 Flandres was exporting more textiles than even Modena, making it the center of the world's industry. This all depended on a 'peace' in the Orient, though a 'peace' enforced by tens of thousands of soldiers is, at least to me, scarcely a peace at all.

This brings me to the great conflict of Flandres. It is not merely between the rich and poor. It is not merely between city and ‘town’ (the new phrase used to legally excuse the aristocratic rule over cities, which legally could not be presided by aristocrats). It is between two different ways of life, two different means of production--that of the artisan and that of the manufactory. The history of the last century has been a history of great gains in the absolute but great losses in the relative by the guild system. While new techniques and new technologies have supported the guild structure, and while the last hundred years have led to a massive increase in the population of guild members, the guilds have declined in relation to the new class of ouviers, that is the men and women employed by the new noble-business class.

But it has not been a decline unfought, dear readers. Since the building of the Scheldt Canal, Flandres has been a constant thorn in the side of the nobility, the courts, the crown. Our world was not 'naturally' built into what it was today as de Tocqueville would have you know--it was enforced over generations by arms. And the mere presence of tens of thousands of paid thugs in our lands has not stopped us from rising against our dominators. In the next article I will discuss the great and magnanimous role that Flandres played in the Fronde.

Jacob de Bomische
 
Last edited:
Awesome!
 
blsteen: Yeah, we'll need to wait a while before the EU4 forum moves past gameplay AARs. The mechanics look really good, unfortunately my computer is in the shop (and I can't afford the repairs), so I won't be able to play it for a while

Dr.Gonzo: Thank you! I hope to characterize Jacob quite a bit by the time we get to the 1750s. I'm also kind of annoyed that I didn't get to characterize Henri enough throughout these entries because so far he's one of the most interesting kings (I think) I've come up with and I don't think that it's coming through.

General_Hoth: Thank you for the compliments and thanks for continuing to read this!
 
So France has begun its slide towards revolution? That will certanly be interesting (and bloody)