• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Ah France torn apart by religious strife which was capitalized on by greedy noblemen and clerics for their own ends.
All it needs is a descent by the English to burn the French fleet in Toulon and hover off the coast.
Nice that William winds up running the Netherlands. That should be a treat for the Dutch and for the French...

I don't actually know the chronology of it, but I know that some point in the late 1500s Brabants becomes a Duchy, and some point around then they start being run by the Valois (who were actually the rulers of Lorraine at that point in that game), and after that SPOILERS
 
Last edited:
I wish you guys a happy new year, and I wish that I can stop writing about this god damned war within the week!
 
Finally all caught up. Tilly is a bit of a turd isn't he? Nice to see you're having troubles, certainly makes the wars of religion worthy of note.
 
Finally all caught up. Tilly is a bit of a turd isn't he? Nice to see you're having troubles, certainly makes the wars of religion worthy of note.

Most of the time we, as players, see revolts--even mass revolts--as an annoyance. The revolter AI is too bad, it's armies are too easy to beat, and if you're a large country it is nearly impossible for a revolter army (especially in your center, as someone who rarely plays naval nations colonial revolts can get really annoying when you need to build 15 new transports just to send your armies across the Atlantic/Indian/Mediterranean. Furthermore, the player's view is so long-term that the huge drops in commerce and population that revolts lead to are pretty much unimportant.

But, to someone living in the time having nearly 100,000 people rising up and being killed, and then having ~2 million people getting exiled (including most of France's Jews and nearly all of her protestants), would be a hugely traumatic experience to a country of 20 million, and the defining event for two whole generations, not to mention control all of the attention of the ruling class.
 
LordsofFrance-3.png

The invasion of the Rhineland

Tilly’s offensive into the Rhineland—defined as the Electorate of the Palatinate, the Duchy of Baden, the Bishoprics of Mainz and Alsace, the Imperial City of Frankfurt and the County of Franche-Comte (which was formally under the Archduke of Austria, a formal agreement which hadn’t stopped the Count of Franche-Comte from supporting Protestants in Switzerland, Italy, and France)—was not so much a war as it was a land grab. The 30,000 troops of the Rhenish League were poorly trained, many taken straight from the local militia or mobilized right after the declaration of war.

EU3_139-1.jpg

The Rhenish League, a group of minor states along the French border which conspired to support the Lorraine Pretender in the French War of Religion

The French Army, on the other hand, was battle-hardened and had gone through a process of extensive reform since the beginning of the French War of Religion. The necessity of having loyal recruits led to a reorganization of the Basic unit of the French army—the Regiment—into a more localized unit populated by people from the same village. In order to make sure that villages were loyal, a cantonments system was set up in areas loyal to the French crown, a system that was expanded as the government progressed in the War of Religion.

By 1601, the French Army had expended from 75,000 men to a fighting force of 125,000, and the 5 regular corps’ active in France (du Nord, d’Oest, d’Est, du Sud and des Flandres) were expanded to 20,000 men each (the other two armies were the Parisian Guard, a glorified militia force which never left the bounds of Ile de France, and the Canadian Expeditionary Force I detailed earlier). The 3 corps under Tilly’s command outnumbered the Rhenish Armies two to one, and while the Rhenish troops were untrained, Tilly’s men were battle hardened soldiers who embraced Tilly’s concept of total war and were ready to show it to the rulers who kept France in the midst of civil war for nearly a decade.

EU3_4-19.jpg

The French Regiments system

The Battle of Elsass, the single major battle of the war, lasted only two hours. The combined Rhenish armies met 40,000 Frenchmen in a village three miles from the city of Strassbourg early in the morning of the 6th of March. Tilly, having foreseen this, had sent his cavalry ahead and had kept his artillery on guard through the night. When the Elector Palatine thought that he had caught Tilly off guard and sent his troops forward, Tilly met this advance with a blistering barrage from his artillery before sending his troops to meet the enemy.

While the Rhenish infantry was distracted, Tilly ordered his cavalry to attack the Rhenish rear, killing any they met (he apparently ordered that he wanted to see the heads of the lords of the Rhineland). The charge of 10,000 French cavalrymen at the back of the Rhinelander’s army did them in—when the Rhenish infantry commanders considered a withdrawal and turned back only to see the French flag flying over the commander’s mound, what would have been a withdrawal turned into a rout. The battle led to the death of most of the Rhenish military and all of the Rhenish heads of state, leaving the Rhineland open to complete conquest at the hands of Tilly.

26010546.jpg

The Battle of Elsass, 1605

Over the next three years, French troops won the sieges of Elsass, Freiburg, Chamberry, and Mainz, which led to the annexation of Franche-Comte and Alsace and the transformation of Baden and Mainz into French protectorates. The only attempt by the Emperor to end this war of aggression, a call by the citizens of the Holy Roman Empire in France to rise up, had gone right into the hands of Louis XII, who declared that the Emperor was interfering in France’s internal affairs, where “Only I am sovereign”. All French provinces were withdrawn from the Empire, and the French Crown dismantled all parliaments, estates, and congresses, making France the first Absolute Kingdom.

EU3_28-18.jpg

”Only I am sovereign”

Only Frankfurt, the Palatinate, and the small, recently arrived force of pro-Imperial Protestants stood between Tilly and total conquest of the Southern Rhine. Frankfurt was unlike the other Rhenish states—while the Palatine and Baden had ignored building fortifications through the 40 Years War, Frankfurt’s City Elders knew that Frankfurt was at a strategic position on the Rhine, and that she couldn’t possibly raise a large enough mercenary force to defend herself if attacked. With this knowledge, the city elders built one of the strongest fortifications in Europe around Frankfurt.

3280772,1686491,highRes,maxh,480,maxw,480,Frankfurt+um+1600+(media_616863).jpg

The Fortress of Frankfurt included the innovations that Louis XII had come across during the War of Brabant, and would serve as the model for the fortifications France built on her Western borders

Tilly knew that it would take years to bring down Frankfurt fortress, and that without Frankfurt France would still be vulnerable to an attack from across the Rhine. So he decided to attack Frankfurt the only way he could—psychologically.

The city of Worms, the capital of the Palatine, wasn’t nearly as fortified. The city was of great religious importance—it had been the city that Calvin had left to after his exile from France, and was in many ways the capital of Calvinism--it had remained unoccupied mostly because it was a low-status target for the French Armies, and a citizen of Worms could be forgiven for thinking that the war would end with a white peace on the part of the Palatine. So the appearance of French banners on the horizon in the autumn of 1605 was met with horror. This horror was even worse when the French armies began burning the farms around the city right before the harvest and bombarded the city’s granaries (located, as was common in fortifications built in the early 1500s, within the city walls facing the river, an advantage destroyed by the fact that Tilly had completely surrounded the city).

Civil+War,+Wallenstein+by+Ernest+Crofts.JPG

The end of the siege of Worms

But after this, the bombardments stopped. Tilly simply waited for the city to starve out. Within two months, the new Elector Palatine left the city (on Sunday, December 15th, 1605) to negotiate with Tilly (a risky endeavor, considering that Tilly had personally killed one sovereign and was responsible for the deaths of 4 others). He went so far as to say that Palatinate would convert to Catholicism, to which Tilly laughed. “Do you think I care about your religion? No. This is not about religion, it never has been. It is about fear. Your electorate attacked France, your electorate supported, with men and coin, a pretender to the French throne and created a civil war that lasted for years. I am here to make sure that this never happens again.” And with that, Tilly took the Elector Palatine hostage to see the fate of his city.

The artillery, placed around the city of Worms, all opened fire within a minute of each other. The combined barrage destroyed the city walls in two hours, and then the French infantry and cavalry charged in and set fire to every church, every marketplace, every major building in the city. The burnings of the churches was all the worse: as it was a Sunday, most of Worms’ children were attending Sunday School. In the course of one day, Worms, once one of the largest cities on the Rhine, was reduced to a village of less than 7,000 people. What was worse, Tilly escorted the refugees (including the Elector Palatine, who had gone mad from depression) to Frankfurt, to show the city what would happen to those who opposed the French Kingdom. The surrenders of Frankfurt and the Palatine came shortly after.

At the end of the war, the French government announced that it would financially support any Huguenot family who wished to move to the Rhineland (Huguenots still accounted for a fifth of France’s population). This allowed Tilly (who was appointed Governor General of the French Rhineland) to pursue the Frenchification policies that had been so horrifyingly successful in Flandres. Soon, Mainz became Mayence, Frankfurt became Francfort, Worms became Vormmes. Minor Huguenot gentry became lords in the Rhineland, such as the Orleans branch of the Bourbon family, who became the rulers of the new Electorate of the Rhineland (a combination of the Palatinate’s and Baden’s territories). French is still the first language in many parts of the Rhineland.

FrenchRhineland.jpg

The French Rhineland

The Forty Years War was coming to a close at the end of the War of the Rhineland. Brandenburg, the most moderate member of the League of Stettin, had inherited the crown of Pommerania, and had formed a personal union over Prussia. Over the 40 Years War, Brandenburg had established Protestant dominance over northern Germany, a position that the Hohenzollerns were satisfied with. Everywhere else, Wars of Religion had concluded themselves with one side becoming triumphant*, and either killing or exiling the members of the losing side**. The Treaty of Mayence, which was written from 1610 to 1612, has been seen as the beginning of modern international relations, with supporters pointing to its proposition that no ruler could force their religion on another state as a sort of proto-sovereignty (in fact Thuringia would fight wars to spread her radical Reformism in central Germany for the next hundred years).

EU3_176.jpg

Europe in 1612

What should be seen, however, is that the creation of pseudo-sovereignty rested on the creation of a set of international laws, which forbade actions such as supporting pretenders in other countries and fighting wars to spread one’s ruling family. However, the recent actions of the French government were hardly mentioned, with the exception of its comment that “The Protectorate of the South Rhine will last under the protection of the Kingdom of France…for the next twenty years”.

Louis-XIV-9386885-2-sized.jpg

One of the last images of Louis XII, likely made when he was in his late 90s

With this treaty signed and done away with, Louis XII was finally able to rest in peace. Over the nearly 70 years of his reign, he had brought France from being merely a part of the Hapsburg Empire to the Great Power of continental Europe. He had defeated all of the would-be usurpers of his reign, and had helped create an international law which would protect France from future civil wars (he thought). For good or for bad, he had fought wars for the liberty of the Dutch, the Swiss, and the Neapolitans, and through those wars he had turned the French military into one of the largest and best trained in Europe. His reign ended in the summer of 1613, in his small summer cottage in Versailles, surrounded by his remaining family, including the child Henri Bourbon, who would be the King of France. It is said that he died smiling, thinking that after all that he had fought in his life, he would now know peace in the afterlife.

But the story of France is still not over.

*in Scandinavia, the Protestant Sweden had conquered the Catholic Denmark and the Reformist Norway in 1602, forming the Grand Kingdom of Scandinavia in 1616; in Poland, an alliance between the state, the churches, and the Catholic gentry had defeated the Protestant nobility in 1593, in Modena, a massive Reformist movement was crushed by the Di Machiavelli family, ending with the imposition of a semi-monarchical system of rule in Italy, and in England the Protestant State defeated parliamentarians in Ireland and Scotland.

**while France may have lost nearly a third of her population in the War of Religion, she was flooded by English, Dutch, and Italian immigrants, many of whom went to Paris)​
 
Last edited:
I feel a sudden urge to throttle Tilly.

Part of my family went trough the exact same thing, They were Irish Catholics, and then Cromwell came to retake it. They were forced at sword-point to renounce Catholicism and convert. Seeing that keeping their heads was a better idea, they converted.

Still, it perfectly captures the Era. War of all against all, religious conflicts, and you mentioned a twenty year thing. Are you predicting the 30 year war in this timeline? If so, you must drive to the left bank of the Rhine. Only then can France rest in peace.
 
Amazing, I can only dream of writing something HALF as good as this. But yes I do believe you posted the update twice.
 
Amazing post, but you may have pressed ctrl-v twice.

Amazing, I can only dream of writing something HALF as good as this. But yes I do believe you posted the update twice.

Right you are! I've fixed the problem.

And thank you very much for the compliment, Rifal.

I feel a sudden urge to throttle Tilly.

Part of my family went trough the exact same thing, They were Irish Catholics, and then Cromwell came to retake it. They were forced at sword-point to renounce Catholicism and convert. Seeing that keeping their heads was a better idea, they converted.

Still, it perfectly captures the Era. War of all against all, religious conflicts, and you mentioned a twenty year thing. Are you predicting the 30 year war in this timeline? If so, you must drive to the left bank of the Rhine. Only then can France rest in peace.

Thank you for the comment, but no, this is the 30 Years War of this timeline--partially became there isn't another war of similar size in my game for a century (although the War of Hispaniola set a precedent for colonial wars as I'll note in the next couple of sections), and partially because after ~4 months and ~75 pages of writing about war and near genocidal actions I'm psyched to write about peacetime and the beginning of the Enlightenment in France.

superb update ... Tilly is pretty ruthless in the pursuit of revenge and French expansion - but has it sown the seeds of future problems?

Ha ha, yeah. The 'L'etat C'est Moi', plus all of the aggressive wars I did against members of the empire means that I still have horrendous relations with the HRE a century later.

Ah, the French land grab of this decade

Or is it?!?!?
 
Very excellent, you've achieved France to the Rhine. I've been slowly catching up with this AAR over the past couple of days and it is genuinely great. I'll echo what Director said, this reads like real history, the 'seeding' of the Palatinate is brutal and believable.

You also make a good point about the player's centuries long POV versus what a 'real' person in-game would think of the huge wars we put them through. Although Paradox games are ultimately about 'great men' and the grand arc of history, putting in some references to common people and the hell they go through only raises the quality of an AAR. Your mention that a third of France died for her new position really brings the downside of such power politics into focus.

After all that blood I agree with you, a little Enlightenment will be refreshing.
 
LordsofFrance-3.png

Imperial Pretensions

The End of the 40 Years War saw a French government at the highest point it had ever been. Not since Charlemagne had French kings governed so much territory, and furthermore the last vestiges of the old nobility had been swept away by a mass of aristocratic corpses*. The sheer number of noblemen killed in the war’s early stages—it is estimated that the War of Brabant alone brought the extinction of more than 130 major noble houses—could have led to economic catastrophe after the war, and many areas of south-western France had been depopulated by Tilly’s scourges of the Huguenots.

But Bosquet’s policy of selling titles of nobility, and giving nobility to officers who distinguished themselves on the field and in the bureaucracy, meant that rather than going down, the number of noble houses more than doubled by the end of the war. Furthermore, much of the money taken from the Austrian archduke and the Protestant princes was quickly redistributed to these new noblemen, who spent their money on what all nouveau riche really want—extravagant and prestigious houses and through that, new prestige.

73-222.jpg

The French still life gained popularity through the 17th century. Its depiction of aristocratic plenty also served to tell the new nobility things to put in their new houses

The 1620s saw the beginning of the chateau, a highly extravagant manor which had little use as a fort or military base. The chateau instead was a ‘civic castle’, the new home for well off noblemen who wanted to show off their taste and class instead of protecting themselves in stone walls. Their building was enabled by the boom in the number of Royal Engineers who had made their careers by designing highly complicated star forts during the war. The winding down of military spending left these Engineers out to dry, and they in turn either became the architects of these new chateaus, or—and this was new—they moved to Paris to teach engineering and architecture in L’Ecoles. So, more significantly than the birth of the chateau, the 1620s saw the birth of civic architecture.

chateau-chenonceau-painting.jpg

The chateau boom of the 1620s also led to boom in craftsmanship, which produced much needed economic growth for the people of France. Given that plain forms of design—white walls, straight lines—were rife with connotations of the Protestantism that France ended up fighting to suppress, the new ‘Baroque’ style, filled with wavy lines, extravagant interior design, and decorated with lavish art and furniture, gave many jobs to new artists, furniture craftsmen, masons, glass blowers, not to mention stewards, cooks, and gardeners.

Paris benefitted a great deal as well. The craftsmen who built the chateaus of the countryside eventually settled in the city, which was seen by many as the New Rome, the center of the world. The L’Ecoles, which barely required any noble blood and which were the products of Bosquet's educational reforms, finally saw a large number of applicants as scholars from all over Western Europe came to the center of the world to study.

But they didn’t study the old liberal arts, oriented around theology**. The Sorbonne, a new school system of Paris started in the liberal arts, but after two years as a generalist, a scholar moved to a school focused on specific fields—there were first schools of Architecture, the Arts, Music, Philosophy, Governance, and the Sciences, although they soon evolved into a whole ‘universe’ of Fine (rather than Liberal) Arts colleges which formed the basis for the modern college system.

The-Courtyard-Of-The-Old-Sorbonne.jpg

D’Universe de l’Universite’, the Universe of Universities (the Sorbonne); the French penchant for wordplay begins in the 1620s with the mass of scholars who flocked to Paris, each eager to impress the next with their mastery of the French language, which became the new Lingua Franca following the Treaty of Limburg; Latin was associated with the violence of the wars of religion for a century after the war’s end.

Something else unique to the French Fine Arts Universities was their focus on ‘reality’ as opposed to theory***. Theory was associated with Theology, and it was thought that theological rather than ‘real’ differences led to the 40 Years War in the first place. So while the wars were seen as fantastic in so far as they led to French suzerainty, ‘reality’ was seen as the remedy to all conflicts—after all, if everyone’s thinking was perfectly associated with reality there would be no disagreement****.

From this, we can understand the beginnings of the Modern period’s obsession with the natural sciences, but we can also understand the beginning of the use of the Still Life and the development of increasingly realistic forms of drawing and painting. We can also see this in the School of Government’s syllabi: the introductory class was on the History of the Roman Republic, the brainchild of Prince Nicolo Machiavelli’s later years and the first text in the tradition of political realism.

The government couldn’t help but be pleased with itself. The death of Louis XII had come at the perfect time, allowing a long regency in which the bureaucracy and the military were able to run things as they wished. And the decline of the old houses of the nobility meant that most of the bureaucrats and officers were blessed with a long series of recently constructed titles (most notably the Duc Tilly, now Duc de Rhine).

The Duc de Vigny was the regent of a prince who had a massive number of titles, which seemed to increase by the day (one can thank the Interior Department, who knew that they could give the Crown direct authority over many of the lands of the old houses, and who knew that crafting titles in the Colonies meant that the King could give these titles to others at later times). But what did these titles mean? Vigny meant to find a way to govern in light of the horrors of the war. This was all for the best. Though France remained a Kingdom on paper, the War had transformed her image of herself. No longer was the King of France just the Most Christian King, no longer were the French merely one people among the many peoples of Europe. The King of France was steward to the legacy of Charlemagne; French was the New Latin; France the new Empire, not only Holy, not only Roman, but better than both.

France was Enlightened.

A_young_Louis_XV_from_the_studio_of_Jean_Baptiste_van_Loo.jpg

Henri de Bourbon, Rey de France et Quebec, Duc de Milano, de Provence, de Gascogne, de Breton, de Normandie, de Flandres, de Savoie, de Lorraine, de Bourbon, d’Antilles, et de Orleans, Comte de Paris, d’Alsace, de Calais, de Nice, de Parma, d’Auvergne, et de Louisville
*This is not to say that feudalism is dead by any means; it wouldn’t be until the 19th century that France gave up noble privileges for good, I merely mean to say that the ideology of the old feudalism is dead and buried on the hills of the Alps.

**It’s worth noting that, although studying the liberal arts (literature, art, math, philosophy, history, theology, languages, a couple others) is now seen as finding a way to better understand one’s self, in the Scholastic era when the liberal arts were conceived, they were seen as finding a way to better understand God. Understanding different components of God’s creation was a way to better understand what God’s intentions are for humanity. This is why Theology was seen as the eldest sister of the humanities. Collingwood says that the Middle Ages up until the Enlightenment can be seen through this lens—the Medieval scholar saw all ‘proper’ forms of thinking as emergent from Theology in a similar way that the Modern scholar sees all ‘proper’ thought as dependent on scientific modes of thinking.

***Which is, of course, a false distinction—we can only perceive reality through a world of mankind-created thought, language, and numbers, and a theory which insults the notion of theory is probably fooling itself.

****A pragmatism which was attacked by Descartes a generation later; his “I think, therefore I am”, was a metaphysical attack on the pragmatism of the post-war period and the point when the Enlightenment came into its own.​
 
again, really like the way you are wandering off down some interesting side-ways in this. As with your earlier framing of the losses in the wars of religion, again this points up the dislocation and turn over of the wars, and the way that in turn opened up a new society.

can't say I agree with you about Descartes, but perchance that is not a debate for here :cool:
 
Well now that France is the most powerful nation in Europe (Both militarily and politically) what's next, expansion in the Americas? England won't like that.
 
Hey guys, I'd like you to know that Lords of France is in the running for the AARlander's Choice Awards!

Now, I don't think that this AAR will get the award--I'm competing against very well written gameplay AARs which are way more accessible--I've never been writing an accessible AAR and I accept the effects that come out of that. However, this is a great way to possibly increase this AAR's coverage among readers who wouldn't go into the EU3 section.

So vote! (for me, for others, for whomever you want!)


Well now that France is the most powerful nation in Europe (Both militarily and politically) what's next, expansion in the Americas? England won't like that.

Expansion in the new world will occur, not necessarily in North america
 
again, really like the way you are wandering off down some interesting side-ways in this. As with your earlier framing of the losses in the wars of religion, again this points up the dislocation and turn over of the wars, and the way that in turn opened up a new society.

can't say I agree with you about Descartes, but perchance that is not a debate for here :cool:

Without a doubt, Descartes in our timeline is a huge example of scientistic/positivist thought. I'm taking his focus on mathematics/physics/metaphysics and reversing it's focus--rather than being a sceptic, Descartes sets up maths/sciences as a new dominant idea.

Descartes...Always a party pooper
But at least not a fan of supermen...

Easier to spell that's for sure.
 
I really enjoy reading your writing. I learn stuff, is good. Also, as a math man you can see this intellectual/ideological transformation you describe even in the mathematics of the day, which of course went hand in hand with the scientific developments as well.