Well, I can't really find much on Manichaeans that could be translated into game mechanics. Neomanichaeans do seem to exist, though.
It obviously shouldn't be a heresy of Zoroastrianism, although it could possibly be part of the Mazdan group (or alternatively the Christian one, or even it's own). Manichaeans could possibly have access to absolute cognatic and female councillors and all that, like Messalians and Cathars, but unfortunately the only place I've seen gender and racial equality cited is on a neomanichaean's blog.
As for their replacement as a heresy of Zoroastrianism, I'd propose Zurvanism (which in game terms would be wholly indistinguishable from mainstream Zoroastrianism, as far as I can tell). Speaking of heresies, I don't think Manichaeanism would have any.
It obviously shouldn't be a heresy of Zoroastrianism, although it could possibly be part of the Mazdan group (or alternatively the Christian one, or even it's own). Manichaeans could possibly have access to absolute cognatic and female councillors and all that, like Messalians and Cathars, but unfortunately the only place I've seen gender and racial equality cited is on a neomanichaean's blog.
As for their replacement as a heresy of Zoroastrianism, I'd propose Zurvanism (which in game terms would be wholly indistinguishable from mainstream Zoroastrianism, as far as I can tell). Speaking of heresies, I don't think Manichaeanism would have any.