• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Kyriakos

Writer
May 21, 2010
606
45
Irish article said:
Oliver Cromwell was a metrosexual obsessed with his appearance
Patrick Counihan @irishcentral May 19,2014 04:22 AM


New reports are set to shock historians - Oliver Cromwell was a metro-sexual in touch with his feminine side.
Reports are set to shock historians - Oliver Cromwell was a metro-sexual in touch with his feminine side.



Researchers now claim the merciless English tyrant was addicted to fancy cosmetics and infatuated with his appearance.

Cromwell, perhaps the most hated figure in Irish history, slaughtered tens of thousands of Irish men, women and children in 1649.

He also coined the phrase ‘To Hell or to Connacht’ as he built a reputation as a warlord to be feared.

Now it transpires that he had a softer, effeminate side according to a report in the Irish Sun.

The newspaper says that academics now believe Cromwell was obsessed with his appearance.

The claim has been made after chemical tests on the contents of mysterious pots that once belonged to Cromwell.

The research concludes that the pots contain soft soap, most likely made from olive oil.

The scientists at Exeter University in England say the items had no medicinal use and were even scented with delicate fragrances.

Most soaps in the mid-17th century were made using animal fat or fish oils and tended to have a foul stench says the report.

Study group leader Sally Pointer explained: “The metrosexual Cromwell slathered himself in only the finest quality women’s creams which would have made him smell like flowers.

“This is real top-of-the-range stuff - like going into Harrods and shopping from the most expensive make-up counter.

“It shows appearances were important even for a person like Cromwell, who was very godly, with personally very strong puritan convictions.”

Pointer revealed the grooming products were taken from a small wooden chest containing 55 pots that once belonged to Cromwell.

Curators found four labels previously hidden under embroidered lids that list the perfumes in the products as ‘jasmine’, ‘orange tree flowers’, ‘bitter oranges’ and ‘cassia’, a spice similar to cinnamon.

Chairman of the British Cromwell Association Dr Patrick Little said: “If this was a gift from abroad, it shows that he was not perceived as being austere.”

The chest will be the centrepiece of an exhibition which opens this weekend at the Cromwell Museum in Huntingdon, England.

Article is at http://www.irishcentral.com/news/ol...-with-his-appearance-150741285-237446191.html



Portrait-Of-Oliver-Cromwell-$281599-1658$29.jpg


Cool. Not really sure though if not using 'soap with a stench of animal fat' makes one 'in touch with his feminine side'. I suppose that is a hyperbo(a)rean thing :eek:hmy:
 
I doubt it is really mainstream history, despite the claims in the article (?). Part of the aim of this prestigious thread is to establish that to some degree.
The other part is more about England :)
 
All hail the flowery aroma of the Lord Protector of the Commonwealth!

icpngi.jpg
 
All hail the flowery aroma of the Lord Protector of the Commonwealth!

icpngi.jpg
How were statues like that allowed to survive the restoration of monarchy?
 
They weren't. Built in the 19th century.

Do you really think Cromwell had statues of himself built around the country? :rofl: He wasn't exactly Stalin.
 
Someone apparently didn't see his "warts and all" portrait.

They may have seen the other, rather less famous, portrait however (with fairly good article here on this here):

cromwell_attire.jpg


The "story" itself is pretty much a non-issue though: it was quite normal for European men in the early-modern period to use cosmetics. It's like saying Cromwell didn't wear trousers - technically correct, but rather misses the point of how things were done in the period.
 
Do you really think Cromwell had statues of himself built around the country? :rofl: He wasn't exactly Stalin.
Considering most kings had statues of themselves erected at that time and considering that Lord Protector was kind of a dictator title (as far as I know) I wouldn't have been surpriced if he didn't want to be behind the monarchs of Europe.