How can we have this in game? Kings with King-level vassals e.g. "Lord of Ireland"

  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

CosmicDwarf

Captain
5 Badges
Jan 23, 2013
407
55
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Hearts of Iron III Collection
  • Victoria 2
  • 500k Club
Part of the problem with the very rigid "count, duke, king, emperor" structure we currently have in-game is that, even with cultural titles like "petty king", we still can't simulate history properly.

An example of this was after the Eastern Irish were conquered by the Anglo-Norman (or arguably Cambro-Norman) knights in the 1100s and rule of law was asserted by King Henry II of England. The King of England at that point controlled enough land (besides patches here and there and the far reaches of Connacht, Munster and most of Ulster) that if he was a CK2 player he would almost be able to proclaim himself King of Ireland, or at least create the title. He actually did, in a way; he named his 9 year old son and heir, Prince John (soon to become Bad King John of England) "Lord of Ireland", thus all the Norman vassals in Ireland were under the rule of the 9 year old Prince. Of course it's important to note that Henry himself didn't really control all that land; his vassals were very powerful and much of his rule was "in name only" but you get the point. The King of England's "vassal" had a title that would be considered "King-level" in-game; this is impossible to simulate in CK2 at this moment.

The title "Lord of Ireland" stayed around right up until Henry the Eighth of England in the 1500s decided that he wanted to be known as King of Ireland, and so the Kingdom of Ireland was created for the first time as a sovereign state, almost of the sort we would recognise today (albeit as an English puppet creation), unlike the ancient Gaelic "High Kingdom" title that passed around whichever Petty King was the strongest on the island. The reason why there was a person called the "Lord Lieutenant of Ireland" from 1171 right up until the establishment of the Irish Free State in 1922 was that the "King of Ireland" title had continuity with the old "Lord of Ireland" title; the Lord Lieutenant was the lieutenant or "deputy" of the real "Lord", or more accurately the Viceroy of the Lord of Ireland.

So based on that we can determine that a theoretical CK2 player, playing as John Lord of Ireland in the 1100s, could be King-level, subordinate to the King of England and also enjoy King-level privileges like Viceroyalty.

When a King, such as the King of England, managed to conquer another Kingdom like Ireland, he didn't just proclaim himself "Emperor of Britannia" or something. He might call himself King of all England and Ireland (I've heard of titles like that), but more likely he would reduce the title to the ambiguous-sounding "Lord" or something similar. Is there a way we can simulate this in-game? Could Kings create a kind of subordinate title between King and Duke called "Lord" to be used for Kingdoms that have been conquered? We need to find some way of simulating the King + subordinate King relationship that went on so much in the middle ages.
 
Last edited:
There are a lot of complains about empires besides the HRE and ERE existing but at this point they are in the game as it is coded. Personally I don't disagree even something like Great Britain when it was formed wasn't really an empire in the ck2 sense of the word or Russia for that matter.
 
I don't really have a massive problem with the more fantastical Empire titles; people are coming up with various suggestions in other threads. I'm more concerned with simulating real-life situations where Kings (who did not consider themselves Emperors, only in their most fevered dreams perhaps) had vassals that could be considered King-level, like John Lord of Ireland. It's hard to simulate that in the current game when we're so caught up in the rigid "Duke, King, Emperor" structure.
 
I'm not sure that John would qualify as a king level vassal in this situation.

He was as much a vassal as your infant son and heir would be in CK2 if you, as King of England, made him Duke of Kent. He was as much a King in that his title was designed to replace the old "High King of Ireland" title whilst still being subordinate to the King of England, and indeed he was superior in rank to men like the extremely powerful Cambro-Norman knight known as "Strongbow" who basically became King of Leinster in all but name during the conquest, a title you could consider Duke-level in-game. Given that real life does not conform to CK2 rules in any way I think that's about as close as you'll ever get to being a King-level vassal.

The problem is that the Lord of Ireland title was rarely in the hands of someone other than the King of England after Bad King John, but for a good few decades there was a situation that is completely impossible to simulate in CK2. Were there other occurrences like this elsewhere in the world?
 
Last edited:
Holding the area of a kingdom isn't the same as being a King. For example the Dukes of Brittany effectively held all the territory of the Kingdom of Brittany, but were not Kings. Kings for France held all of Acquitane but were not kings of Acquitane(In later periods) and so on...
 
A king can't literally give out his king titles without them going independent, but he could create a super duke or super vice-duke (with the appropriate tech level) to rule all of Ireland.
 
Yeah, that sounds like some kinda custom high/arch/grand/whatever-duke.

But as I said, how could we have a custom Duke-level title when the Lord of Ireland ruled over vassals that were about as close to Dukes as you could get? They may have been considered "Earls", but that's just because the whole concept of "Dukes" in England prior to the late middle ages was very alien. If it was anything like CK2 they would be Duke-tier.

A king can't literally give out his king titles without them going independent, but he could create a super duke or super vice-duke (with the appropriate tech level) to rule all of Ireland.

A super duke called "Lord" that can rule over other Dukes/Petty Kings? Maybe the Kingdom title could be temporarily downgraded to a kind of Archduke level (or just a new level entirely) called a Lordship? I know this is similar to Viceroyalty, but in Charlemagne the only way to get Viceroys is to be the Emperor. The King of England used Viceroys from the 1100s onwards in Ireland.
 
You can sort of do this in CK2 under the same circumstances.

Start by stripping the Ireland rulers of their duke-level titles, then give them all to your son. There, super-duke son as your vassal, with authority on the lesser nobles. He probably won't have any issue with the Vassal Limit, either.
 
This could also be part of a larger problem: that ranks of various titles still need to be diversified by culture more than they currently are. For example, replacing the title "emperor of Britannia" with "High King of Britannia" (especially locked into either elective or tansity at first) could go along way in terms of immersion. Also replacing the titles of "king of England" and "king of Ireland" with high king for Anglo-Saxon/Norse rulers in England and Irish rulers in Ireland could help as well.

Another problem is that the lock tier system of baron-count-duke-king-emperor has to be locked, or it allows for way to many other tiers, like baronet, viscount, marquis, ect. I like the system as it stands, but I think it needs to expand so that same tiered titles are called different things based on region and/or culture. Emperor of Scandinavia replaced with High King of Scandinavia (or High King of the Norse), the use of the title Archduke for titular kingdoms created under the new system within the HRE, and also, adding in Translation Imperil so that the holder of HRE is called King/High King of the Germans if not crowned by the Pope. Just a thought
 
A super duke called "Lord" that can rule over other Dukes/Petty Kings? Maybe the Kingdom title could be temporarily downgraded to a kind of Archduke level (or just a new level entirely) called a Lordship? I know this is similar to Viceroyalty, but in Charlemagne the only way to get Viceroys is to be the Emperor. The King of England used Viceroys from the 1100s onwards in Ireland.

They wont' be able to rule over other duke tier characters. CKII's basic mechanics would only let such a character rule over earls.
 
They wont' be able to rule over other duke tier characters. CKII's basic mechanics would only let such a character rule over earls.

I am trying to suggest the creation of a new title between King and Duke, similar to an Archduke in real life who could rule over Dukes and Counts. The title could be given to those who are holders of Kingdoms, but are actually vassals of Kings. It's a bit like a strategic downgrade of an acquired King-title, if you will, and functions in a similar way to Viceroyalty when held in the hands of a vassal. The title could change depending on culture; if the culture is English then they could be known as "Lord".

If you hold more than one Kingdom, your non-primary Kingdom could be downgraded to this title so the King of England could be both King of England and Lord of Ireland. If he liked the title of Lord of Ireland best, he could upgrade that to King by making it primary, meaning that England would become a Lordship.

There are problems with this. It's hard to imagine the King of England becoming King of France, then deciding he liked France better and calling himself Lord of England and King of France; the English would be up in arms about that one. Note that when the King of Scotland became King of England in the 1600s he didn't downgrade Scotland to Lordship status. The "Lord" title only really works for realms with subjugated people who are considered subordinate/lower level, like the Irish. "Lord" in Ireland was essentially a colonial governor's title.

With that in mind, perhaps this sub-kingdom title (in the case of the Lordship of Ireland) could carry a repression bonus with it? To reflect its nature? So you would have a choice; either keep the Kingdom title for yourself and appoint a viceroy to rule in your name (or rule both and enjoy an increased chance of becoming stressed), or downgrade the title somewhat from King to sub-King and establish a "Lordship" with a repression bonus. The loss of monthly prestige from the downgrade would be quite small to reflect the power/importance of the "Lordship".
 
Last edited: