Hearts of Iron IV - Development Diary 4 - Land Doctrines

  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Darkrenown

Star marshal
141 Badges
Jan 8, 2002
24.816
17.037
no
  • Leviathan: Warships
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • For The Glory
  • For the Motherland
  • Gettysburg
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Hearts of Iron III: Their Finest Hour
  • Hearts of Iron III Collection
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Impire
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • King Arthur II
  • Knights of Pen and Paper +1 Edition
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Lost Empire - Immortals
  • Magicka
  • Majesty 2
  • Majesty 2 Collection
  • March of the Eagles
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Naval War: Arctic Circle
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Europa Universalis: Rome
  • Rome Gold
  • Hearts of Iron IV: No Step Back
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Ancient Space
  • Arsenal of Democracy
  • Hearts of Iron II: Armageddon
  • Cities in Motion
  • Cities in Motion 2
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • A Game of Dwarves
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Darkest Hour
  • Deus Vult
  • Dungeonland
  • East India Company
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Europa Universalis III: Chronicles
  • Divine Wind
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
Hello! It's time for another Hearts of Iron 4 Developer Diary, and this one is about Land Doctrines. For HoI4, we are leaning more towards the Doctrine paths you may remember from HoI2 than the mix-and-match of HoI3. We have 4 main mutually exclusive Doctrine paths which nations can research. Each path also has one or more mutually exclusive choices to further differentiate the doctrines and sub-doctrines. Because we are still pre-alpha, I can't really describe exactly what each tech in the tree does at the moment; this can and will change as we implement, test and iterate over them. I can describe the general idea behind each path and choice so hopefully you will understand what we are aiming for.

Diary 4 - doctrin tree.jpg


Mobile Warfare: This path focuses on mobile mechanized units and is the default German path. Armour and motorized/mechanized units will have the largest gains in this path. It also reduces the planning time needed before you can launch an attack. This path is somewhat frontloaded with early bonuses. The first branching in this tree allows you to choose between Mobile Infantry or Armour as your main focus. While Mobile Infantry isn't as effective in combat, it is cheaper and can be used in greater numbers, so it could be an alternate strategy for Germany, or be used by a less industrially powerful nation. The second split offers the choice between switching over to a defensive posture (maximizing Manpower gains) as Germany historically did, or continuing to develop offensive mobile doctrines. And yes, we know Blitzkrieg wasn't a formal doctrine, but the mishmash of innovations and new techniques that the Germans used is popularly known as such, so we roll with it.

Superior Firepower: This is the American default path. This doctrine focuses on big, well-equipped, but expensive divisions and gains a bonus when fighting in areas with friendly air superiority. The first split offers the choice between adding more support units to each division, or focusing on independently deployed support brigades. The second split will let you pick between Airland battle (for increased cooperation with the air force for combat support) or Shock and Awe (which keeps the majority of your focus on ground-based firepower).

Grand Battleplan: This could be thought of as the traditional doctrine path, and is the default choice for Britain, France, Italy, and Japan. This doctrine path gives you larger planning bonuses and boosts Infantry and Artillery. It is a bit weak on the offence to begin with, but has some defensive bonuses. The split offers the choice between increased offensive potential and steadily improving all unit types with the Assault path, or focusing heavily on Infantry with the more frontloaded Infiltration path.

Mass Assault: The default doctrine for the USSR and China. It focuses on using large amounts of Manpower and offers increased morale and reinforce-speed. The early techs give some defensive bonuses and Infantry/Militia boosts. The first path decision here offers either continuing with the same methods with Mass Mobilisation (the mass use of Infantry and Militia) or adopting the innovative Soviet Deep Battle doctrine, which makes use of the modern tools of war and boosts the capability of Armour, artillery, and mobile units. You may notice from the image that the Mass Mobilisation path is shorter than the others. This is because it's more of a series of stopgap measures for nations in dire straits than a real doctrine, and we want to encourage nations to swap out of it when/if their situation improves.

"Swap out of it?" I hear you say. Yes, you can change your Doctrine path if you want. This will come at a cost. There will be a period of disorganisation for your army based on how far into your previous path you were and on the size of your army, so it's likely not something you want to do when things are going very poorly in the middle of a war. However, you do not necessarily start from scratch in your new Doctrine path: Several techs are shared between the paths, and if you switch to a path which includes a shared tech you have already researched you will start at that point in the new tree.

Ok, that's about all for this DD, start trying to guess the tech names based on their icons! :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • 16
  • 5
  • 3
Reactions:
Very shamefur
 
  • 1
Reactions:
Seems nice and streamlined. I'm glad the vanilla HOI3 doctrine tree isn't in. Too much all over the place.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
I really hope this isn't a no-brainer where everyone simply lumps for the Blitzkrieg path, because LOL, Blitzkrieg. Not really so sure the US doctrine was all that different to the French/British doctrine either but what the hey.
 
I don't really understand Infiltration.
What does that even mean, and how do you segue from huge, pre-planned set piece WW1 battles to sneaky sneaky unorthodox infiltration? (If that's what the doctrine is about.)
 
Last edited:
I don't really understand Infiltration.
What does that even mean, and how do you segue from Huge, pre-planned set piece WW1 battles to sneaky sneaky unorthodox infiltration? (If that's what the doctrine is about.)

You sneak your men into position, possibly even into the enemy's defensive lines, before you start your huge attack. Keeps the element of surprise and allows key parts of the enemy's line to be isolated and overwhelmed.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
Mass mobilization branch is so short :( I believe you will add some techs there to make it as long as other ones? :)
 
I don't really understand Infiltration.
What does that even mean, and how do you segue from Huge, pre-planned set piece WW1 battles to sneaky sneaky unorthodox infiltration? (If that's what the doctrine is about.)
It simulates the Japanese strategy during WW2. They came, like most countries, from the Grand Plan Doctrine but also implemented infiltration. However infiltration was mostly a "tactical doctrine" rather than a "Strategic" or "Operational doctrine" and it is quite possible that the game binds those two together.
 
Mass mobilization branch is so short :( I believe you will add some techs there to make it as long as other ones? :)


see this

Mass Assault: The default doctrine for the USSR and China. It focuses on using large amounts of Manpower and offers increased morale and reinforce-speed. The early techs give some defensive bonuses and Infantry/Militia boosts. The first path decision here offers either continuing with the same methods with Mass Mobilisation (the mass use of Infantry and Militia) or adopting the innovative Soviet Deep Battle doctrine, which makes use of the modern tools of war and boosts the capability of Armour, artillery, and mobile units. You may notice from the image that the Mass Mobilisation path is shorter than the others. This is because it's more of a series of stopgap measures for nations in dire straits than a real doctrine, and we want to encourage nations to swap out of it when/if their situation improves.
 
  • 1
Reactions: