VI. "Warm Bodies"
The
Facutebria Ferros de Socrocaba - Brazil's first ironworks, circa 1850
The rise of the new government in 1847 was ostensibly welcomed in the Imperial Palace. Though Pedro II was of a liberal persuasion, he saw the Conservative Party as a sign of modernisation in Brazilian politics. Leao's government was dominated by young, educated men who were driven by the national interest rather than familial advancement. Zacarias Vasconcelos, co-founder of the Party became Interior & Justice Minister. Pedro Bellegarde, bearing a limp from the Platine War, oversaw both the War and Naval departments. Joao Vanderlei, a distant relative of General Wandenkolk, became the first Finance Minister with an actual background in economics. Finally the Foreign Ministry went to the not so youthful Dom de Sousa, a respected diplomat and representative of the Senate lords [1]. The Emperor boasted, “our cabinet is now one of high minds, not base interests”. The inclusion of himself in the group was not an empty formality. Finally rid of regents, Pedro intended to play his part in the affairs of state. This was not something initially welcome by Leao. Relations between the two men were cool, with the Emperor and many others at Court viewing the Prime Minister's outmanoeuvring of Dom Lima for control of the Conservatives distasteful. Given that Imperial politics had been host to endless skulduggery since independence, it was clear much of the criticism was based on Leao's social standing as a merchant and elected member of the lower house.
Tensions were present early on as the nation's delicate finances fluctuated wildly in the late 1840s. The spread of revolution across Europe hit the export-driven economy hard. The fall of the July Monarchy in France – Brazil's second biggest market – led to demands for luxuries like sugar and coffee to collapse, while the reactionary backlash saw protectionism rise across the continent. To the delight of landowners, Vanderlei responded in kind but more was needed. Building on the policies of their Liberal predecessors, the Government relaxed restrictions on logging companies to operate in the Amazon. As timber exports increased however, stories of atrocities against the native population began to surface in the capital. Forced labour, the burning of villages, artificial drought and more were reported, much to the horror of Pedro. The Emperor considered all Brazilians his subjects and protested Leao's disinterest in their plight. The Prime Minister and Cabinet defended the opening up of the province to free enterprise as necessary for Brazil and criticised the reports as alarmist. Pedro eventually relented at the advice of his ministers but demanded the profits be invested in native education and the Empire's infant industries. Fearful for his position if the disagreement continued, Leao agreed. The former was easily made part of the already planned increase in funding for the Jesuits. The latter however would lead to costly subsidies for the factories of Rio and Sao Paulo, with little benefit to the greater economy [2].
Exploitation of the Amazon was successful but at great cost to the native tribes
One positive to come from Europe's hardships was immigration. Thousands arrived in Brazil every month from across the continent. Though many were from the Romance regions, the diversity was such that by the 1850s the Empire was home to its first synagogues, Orthodox churches and even mosques [3]. The single largest influx, almost 150,000 in two years, was the Irish. Facing famine brought on by the Potato Blight, the Irish as Catholics and skilled farmers were encouraged to settle in Brazil with the majority finding work on the coffee plantations of Sao Paulo province. The northern sugar cane fields also benefited from Ireland's troubles, as Britain – going against the continental trend – abolished the Corn Laws and numerous other tariffs. Brazilian sugar, made cheap by slave labour, flooded the market. Increasing demand saw the price of slaves sky rocket and the 'grey market' of the Angolan slave trade reach new heights. Brazil's continued importation of people from Africa was such a major and controversial issue that Westminster had passed a specific law in 1845, the Aberdeen Act, to suppress it. The Royal Navy had begun intercepting Brazilian slavers on the high seas, and slave traders caught on these ships were prosecuted in British admiralty courts. The Act provoked outrage in Brazil, where it was seen as a violation of the free market, freedom of navigation, as an affront to Brazilian sovereignty and territorial integrity, and as an attempt to check the agrarian Empire's economic growth.
By 1850, the sugar boom meant well over half of cases heard at St. Helena's admiralty court were against Brazilian slave traders. In response the Royal Navy became more aggressive, chasing ships into Brazilian territorial waters and on several occasions going ashore to arrest suspects and seize 'contraband'. In May the frigate HMS Archon traded fire with a coastal fort near Belem. Nationalists in the press and General Assembly were appalled, calling the Archon incident an act of war. The British government was undaunted, demanding Rio adhere to international law. Leao's cabinet was divided on how respond. War would be a disaster. The Royal Navy's forces in the South Atlantic alone would be enough to annihilate the Imperial Armada, leaving Brazil's coastal cities open to attack. At the same time patriotic outrage and the influence of the slaveowners meant to simply bow to London's demands would be political suicide. Interior Minister Vasconcelos, a committed abolitionist, also highlighted the moral dimensions. The Prime Minister's own family had made its fortune as slave traders. Into this crisis stepped the Emperor. Pedro had freed the slaves of the Imperial household in 1840, within weeks of his majority, yet he feared the economic and societal effects of outright abolition and had remained publicly neutral on the issue. Leao informed his liege that to avoid catastrophe, Brazil would have to give in to British demands and only the authority of the Emperor could make such a decision acceptable to the nation.
Slave market in Natal, Rio Grande do Norte | Noted fast slaver
SS Emanuela
London also hesitated at the prospect of war, as Anglo-American tensions over the Oregon Territories threatened to spill over into violence. In July, Dom de Sousa held private talks with James Hudson, the British ambassador. It was decided that London would apologise for the Archon incident and respect Brazilian territorial waters. In return Brazil would (quietly) accept the trial of slaver crews caught in international waters by admiralty courts and introduce legislation banning the slave trade outright under penalty of death. The agreement was far from an equal one and it also rested on said legislation being passed. To the Cabinet's disappointment, Pedro had refused to ban the slave trade by Imperial decree. In early August, Leao went before the General Assembly with the purposely bland sounding Illicit Trades Bill. Despite framing the argument around the economic realities and Britain's apology, the Prime Minister faced intense opposition from all sides. The Caramura and Liberals alike scoffed at the Cabinet's apparent cowardice. Afonso Valente, a young Conservative deputy from Belem led the attack from the government benches, demanding “death before dishonour” to wild applause. Whips, a concept alien to Brazilian politics until then, were deployed with gusto by Leao. The final vote in the lower house passed 81-71. Twenty Conservatives had voted against the government, and afterwards five led by Valente crossed the floor, joining the Caramura in protest. As the Bill moved into the Senate in September, Leao was not confident of the result. However debate in the upper house proved mild and perfunctory. The legislation passed 58-4 with eighteen abstentions. Though he had been unwilling to use a decree, the Emperor had made his sympathies known during his Independence Day speech several days before the vote, briefly referring to the slave trade as “a great evil of this age”. The hint taken, the lords had fallen into line.
The resolution of the crisis warmed relations between Leao and the Emperor but also signalled the need for an election. The lengths taken to pass the Bill had lost the Prime Minister a great deal of good will in the Assembly. A general election was scheduled for March 1851, effectively as a vote of confidence on the Cabinet's actions. The delay was necessary due to Brazil's rainy season but it also gave the government breathing room. The Conservative Party's biggest fear was of
Valentista rebels denying them a majority by running unopposed in northern seats. Utilising the party machinery, Leao stood loyal candidates in all 152 seats. Many were completely inexperienced; farmers, soldiers, sons of local Senators. The joke ran that Leao demanded only a warm body, and even that was open to negotiation. Nonetheless the campaign message was clear; only a strong Conservative government with the Emperor's ear could provide a stable economy, the British agreement protecting foreign markets. In the north, pork barrel was added with promises of new roads, bridges and even railways to help connect the sugar plantations to the harbours at Belem and Recife. The opposition though energetic lacked focus. The Liberals had rebounded somewhat under the combative Dom Alegre, who had proven a fierce opponent for Conservative Senators in debate. However Dom Maude remained the ideological heart of the faction, calling for laissez-faire and free trade, both unfashionable stances, while seemingly agreeing with the government on everything else. The Caramura, given fresh blood by Valente, raised the spectre of the Archon and Conservative subservience to Britain. Six months on from the Illicit Trades Act the issue rang hollow with many.
March 1851 General Election
Chamber of Deputies 152 – 77 needed for a majority
Conservative Party 95 (-6)
Liberals 29 (+2)
Caramura 28 (+4)
Senate 80 – 41 needed for a majority
Conservative Party 39 (-9)
Caramura 23 (+8)
Liberals 18 (+1)
Leaders of the opposition: Afonso Valente and Dom Alegre
The results in the Chamber of Deputies vindicated the Conservative campaign strategy [4]. Despite a noticeable swing in the popular vote and the loss of over a dozen deputies, the decision to contest all seats and fight on the economy had compensated them with new gains, limiting the effects. The realignment of the Senate better illustrated the fall in Conservative support, their comfortable majority completely destroyed by defections to the Caramura. The Liberal stagnation in both houses, even being relegated to third place in the Senate, was also notable. At this stage little more than an alliance of southern coffee growers and ranchers, arguably only the distinctive leadership of Alegre had saved them from being squeezed between the reactionary Caramura and modernising Conservatives. Reduced to their core territories, Alegre was determined to rekindle Liberal fortunes in the 1850s. At the same time as the Liberals had reached their lowest ebb, the Caramura – in the Chamber at least – had reached the peak of their popularity. Leao had learned a valuable lesson of the dangers of ignoring nationalist fervour and had no intention of repeating it in the new assembly. Loss of control in the Senate was a disappointment for the government but with party discipline little more than a guideline in the upper house, it could be worked with. In the Chamber meanwhile, the Prime Minister's 'warm bodies' and the self-exile of the
Valentistas meant that his control was stronger than ever.
[1] Much like in Britain at this time, the Foreign Ministry is both very prestigious and quite aristocratic. If the post doesn't go to an old boy I dare say the Senate's collective monocles will drop into their glasses of port in horror.
[2] Circa 1850 Brazil has six in-game factories, none with more than a few hundred employees and rarely making a profit. This powerhouse means I have a whopping industrial score of 1.
[3] For whatever reason 10,000 Turks popped up in Belem one day.
[4] This is not a purely invented narrative. I purposely went against Conservative positions on election events, their percentages fell, only to rebound before the final result.