Home Trending Latest threads New posts Developer diaries

Conservatism

Jump to latest Follow Reply
  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Victoria 2 17560 After Action Reports (AAR)
Show only dev responses
General Baker said:
...I can't hardly have reactionaries in power though... could I? Surely they'd roll back some of the better reforms. On a similar note, what *would* fascists do in power, when they arrive on the scene?
Click to expand...

I just had 50% plus reactionaries in my upper house through event, admittedly this was really early in the game though. Yes, they will want to roll back reforms but it doesn't mean you have to do it. I just ignored them when I saw the hammer and waited for the next upper house election :) If I can, I simply ignore any reforms I don't want, no matter who is in charge. I agree with you though, Conservatism is my preferred choice too.

Shatterfury said:
Liberals will always vote for political reforms and they will vote for social reforms if there is a high militancy.

Socialists will always vote for social reforms and for political reforms if there is high militancy.

Conservatives will vote for both if there is high militancy.

Reactionaries will vote for rolling back all reforms.
Click to expand...

Thank you, very useful info. I didn't actually know that about the Liberals, I thought they simply didn't support social reforms in the game full stop.
 
darthfanta said:
Why should you tax your rich at maximum? Shouldn't they be taxed the least to stimulate more production of factories?
Click to expand...

After a certain point in the game, profits are high enough that capital is no longer the bottleneck for factory building, but rather number of employees and worldwide demand. I suspect he is at that point.
 
SDSkinner said:
After a certain point in the game, profits are high enough that capital is no longer the bottleneck for factory building, but rather number of employees and worldwide demand. I suspect he is at that point.
Click to expand...

Also, if I am not mistaken, unequal tax rates cause militancy after a certain point?
 
Shatterfury said:
Liberals will always vote for political reforms and they will vote for social reforms if there is a high militancy.

Socialists will always vote for social reforms and for political reforms if there is high militancy.

Conservatives will vote for both if there is high militancy.

Reactionaries will vote for rolling back all reforms.

EDIT.
Fascists will always vote against any reform if they aren`t in power.If they are in power they will vote for every reform.
Click to expand...
So actually, there's no 'status quo' party? It's all seems down to managing militancy and conc, I suppose.
 
As that post said, there's nothing about the tax rate in particular that causes increases in CON/MIL. It's about access to goods and spending power. A pop who can't buy their life needs will become more militant, and a pop who can buy all their luxury needs will become less militant and more concious. In either case, the amount you tax someone doesn't matter as long as they can still buy the things they want to.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back