+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Infantry vs Cavalry

  1. #1
    Second Lieutenant AQJ's Avatar
    Crusader Kings IIEU3 CompleteDivine WindHeir to the ThroneEuropa Universalis IV: Pre-order

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Fredericia, Denmark

    Infantry vs Cavalry

    So, how much "better" is cavalry compared to Infantry?

    How does a Free Shooter Infantry (tech 12) stand up against a Chevauchée (tech 2)?

    There is a long gap where you get frequent Infantry, but no Cavalry upgrade - So I wonder if it would be worth it to just skip Cavalry all together for a few decades until you invent Caracole Cavalry (at tech 14)?

  2. #2
    cavalry can flank (two squares away instead of one square away for infantry) so you want them on each side (left and right). also, cavalry shock is amazing. i tend to keep them.
    “War does not determine who is right - only who is left.”
    ― Bertrand Russell
    “Only the dead have seen the end of war.”
    ― George Santayana
    “When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace.”
    ― Jimi Hendrix

  3. #3
    I'd like to know as well.

  4. #4
    Even if their unit type doesn't get upgraded they get some shock bonuses from tech, so they do stay stronger it's just the gaps gets a bit smaller. I played an Horde game where i used the horde cavalry in the 1700s and i fought evenly with full infantry armies from the same age. (I had same military tech.)

  5. #5
    General knul's Avatar
    Cities in MotionCrusader Kings IIEU3 CompleteDivine WindHearts of Iron III
    Heir to the ThroneMagickaVictoria: RevolutionsRome GoldSemper Fi
    Victoria 2Mount & Blade: WarbandEuropa Universalis IV: Pre-order

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    There are two things to consider: the Offensive/ Defensive Shock/Fire/Morale stats and the shock and fire multipliers.

    This is roughly how combat works: every phase, both sides throw a die. To that result, a bunch of modifiers are added, such as terrain and leadership. What is also added is offensive and defensive stats of units. So if unit A and B battle each other, A's offensive stat is added to A's die roll while B's defensive stat is subtracted from A's die roll. The same thing around for B's roll.

    This modified roll is then multiplied by the shock or fire multiplier. So if the battle is in the shock phase, all the modified rolls are multiplied by the shock multiplier. This final resul determines casualties.

    Okay, that's the theory. In practice, you'll see that cavalry has a huge shock multiplier compared to infantry and is even higher than infantry's shock+fire multipliers. So with even fire/shock stats, cavalry will do much more damage. Even if infantry has a bit better stats, cavalry will probably come on top in term of dealing damage.

    What complicates this, are other factors. Ottomans have an NI that improve cavalry, for example, so for them cavalry is relatively good. If you have Ideas that improve general's shock value, cavalry will benefit more. Fire bonusses are basically worthless for cavalry, but will help late-game infantry and artillery.

    So the short answer is: it depends. I hope this information will help you decide for yourself.
    Current AAR: EU4: Single Domination: Ming, the first EU4 AAR ever to feature a non-European country!
    Finished AARs: EU3: Double Domination: Germany versus Japan. EU3: Yin, Yang and the ugly: a Divine Wind Ming AAR

    See an overview of my AARs at my Ink Well page.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts