Get it in the Tech Support forum (requires registration of your game copy).
Changes since 13 May:
Post feedback here!
Changes since 13 May:
Post feedback here!
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Awesome!
I'm guessing it works like this?
Code:
adjacency = { from = 428 to = 430 type = impassable through = 0 } #Navarra-AragonYes. I recommend using adjacency sprites or some other visual cue to make it clear why you can't travel, but it's not a requirement.
Would it be possible to kill leaders by event? Right now, you have to include additional entries for leaders (like Carmagnola or Gilles de Rais) when you choose to let them live.
Something like killleader = x or execute = x...
Something like killleader = x or execute = x...
That´s what the sleepleader command is for?
http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum...ggers-list&p=10731871&viewfull=1#post10731871
I think sleep leader only prevents a leader from being activated but can`t disable him once he's in play. I might be wrong though...
Thanks.
Would it be possible to add a "river" adjacency type to manually define which rivers separate provinces? At the moment rivers adjacencies are calculated automatically from the map. Rivers intersecting through provinces (aplenty in WaTK 4) aren't counted and crossing armies do not suffer any penalties.
At the beginning of every beta-topic, Michael gives a log, what has changed and what was added to new beta.
I just would like to ask, why it is not possible to add a possibility to change province culture dynamically, as I wrote before?
I just would like to ask, why it is not possible to add a possibility to change province culture dynamically, as I wrote before?
Disregard. I just realised this is possible already using:
Code:
adjacency = { from = abc to = xyz type = river through = 0 }Michael, could you include a trigger which affects all provinces for a certain country? Something like -8? It might sound lazy but including every possible province for province_rr is a pain in the a.. and makes events unnecessarily cluttered.
Why use a command to raise provincial revoltrisk in ALL provinces of a state when simply the revoltrisk for the whole state can be modified with revoltrisk?
http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum...ggers-list&p=10731871&viewfull=1#post10731871
Hi,
I am playing FTG 1.3 June version (PLVS VLTRA) and it's amazing. I'm really happy that I found you still support FTG.
I don't know is it god place for suggestions but I've played 2 games (1 BRA and i was AFK) and second as Brabant. In both games Ottomans can't beat MAM. They are not interested in war with MAM they prefer ally with them (the same with other minor states like Carman etc) or at least stay neutral.
Even if I change their relations (-350) they don't want to go at war with MAM.
Is it problem with mod or game?
sorry for my bad English
Regards
I am playing FTG 1.3 June version (PLVS VLTRA) and it's amazing. I'm really happy that I found you still support FTG.
I don't know is it god place for suggestions but I've played 2 games (1 BRA and i was AFK) and second as Brabant. In both games Ottomans can't beat MAM. They are not interested in war with MAM they prefer ally with them (the same with other minor states like Carman etc) or at least stay neutral.
Even if I change their relations (-350) they don't want to go at war with MAM.
Is it problem with mod or game?
sorry for my bad English
Regards
Strange, I play normal AGCEEP and the Ottomans generally conquer Egypt, even if later than in reality. IIRC, Plus Ultra gives the OE claims instead of national cores, so maybe that's why they aren't interested in invading. Try changing those cores and see what happens.
Thanks, I did it earlier (before second game) myself by edit events. It's something else, but thanks for reply.
Looking at the AI file changes in the events I found this:
They are all just comments, this also happens in the original AGCEEP.
Code:
#command = { type = AI which = TUR_SelimI.ai }They are all just comments, this also happens in the original AGCEEP.
That´s a problem of the Plus Ultra mod and not FtG itself. AGCEEP was balanced to work with the vanilla map. Plus Ultra for example changed the type of several cores and removed several cultures from the Ottoman Empire which results in less income, more unrest and so the empire can spend less to achieve it´s historical borders in the historical time.