Truce

Yazem

Major

58 Badges

Jan 20, 2011

690

3

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• Apr 15, 2013

• Add bookmark
• #1

Okay, this is something I've been wondering about for a long time when it comes to Pdox games.

Truces..

Why are these automatically added after a war, instead of being decided during the "peace treaty"?

If you look at history, truces looked different in every war. Some truces were shot and some were long. And it would be a great feature to have in a game such as this one!


So, am I the only one thinking this?

(Details of how it would work, could be discussed).

 

Herr Dak

Major

19 Badges

Apr 7, 2006

595

1

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• Apr 15, 2013

• Add bookmark
• #2

I think truces are necessary especially for MP games. The truces gives you an opportunitie to rebuild and negociate for help after your defeat. I dont think it would be a good idea that the dominant power dont sign any truce because he dont care and can declare war on you again and again until he destroys you and you dont have any chance to respond.

Discussing the Truce Term during the peace treaty would be good, always with a minimun truce time.

 

unmerged(15561)

M.I.A

Mar 14, 2003

10.029

2

• Apr 15, 2013

• Add bookmark
• #3

Definitely worth considering.

Conflict duration should be one consideration for length of truce.
As should be the ferocity of the fighting that took place; i.e. no. of battles vs no. of casualties.

They would be my top two factors to measure the minimum truce length.

 

shorty84

Captain

79 Badges

Aug 17, 2010

453

4

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• Apr 15, 2013

• Add bookmark
• #4

That would be a nice feature, imho!

 

Yazem

Major

58 Badges

Jan 20, 2011

690

3

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• Apr 15, 2013

• Add bookmark
• #5

Herr Dak said:

I think truces are necessary especially for MP games. The truces gives you an opportunitie to rebuild and negociate for help after your defeat. I dont think it would be a good idea that the dominant power dont sign any truce because he dont care and can declare war on you again and again until he destroys you and you dont have any chance to respond.

Discussing the Truce Term during the peace treaty would be good, always with a minimun truce time.

Click to expand...

Yea, ofcourse. A minimum should always be there.

 

Will Lucky

Field Marshal

128 Badges

Jan 18, 2007

2.568

223

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• Apr 15, 2013

• Add bookmark
• #6

It would be nice to have in, but some part of me feels like its been put in on purpose for balancing reasons.

 

donkixot

Second Lieutenant

42 Badges

Jul 6, 2012

123

8

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• Sep 28, 2013

• Add bookmark
• #7

Not a bad idea