• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I thought that the Arab rebellion would give a bit of a boost to the Tories... I was wrong...

To be honest lumping the Revolt and election is chronologically but not thematically accurate. By the time Britain goes to the polls Palestine is still relatively minor news and Mosley has taken the initiative. Now if the violence had kicked off a few months earlier the Tories could have made more of it. Palestine will crop up again later and not to Labour's benefit. Considering their headlessness in providing an alternative to the *New Deal and relative disunity, Palestine probably did save the Conservatives a few marginals, the Government going north of 350 seats was widely expected.


For those interested, I should be updating tonight.
 
I'm getting a real Fight and Be Right vibe from this.
 
By far the most detailed, vivid and readable AAR in the DH forum so far. Keep it up old chap, for king and Mosley!
 
It's nice to see this AAR isn't dead!
 
Union_Jack_small.jpg

VI. Raj

TUatlee4.jpg

Odd One Out: Clement Attlee​

With the election won and another parliamentary term secure, the Government felt able to continue with “business as usual”. Labour’s increased majority was seen by Mosley as less a victory against the Conservatives than as an internal one. The new intake, of primarily young technocrats in battleground seats [1], removed the ILP’s theoretical veto over the Government. This freedom from the demands of the left would be a luxury the Prime Minister made increasing use of as time went on. The first sign of Mosley’s new confidence came subtly during the post-election reshuffle. A muted affair, only one choice truly caught the attention of the press. Clement Attlee, the Foreign Secretary, it was announced, would be stepping down to take up the Viceroyalty of India. Governor-Generalships in the 1930s were, broadly speaking, the preserve of aristocrats and retired senior military officers, with command of the Raj deemed possibly the most prestigious of all Imperial offices. Attlee, though a respected minister, lacked both the social standing and colonial experience normally expected. The Government line was clear; a fresh start, bringing meritocracy to the regime in New Delhi. Discontents on the backbenches quickly spread the theory Attlee had been sent into exile. A quiet man, the Foreign Secretary nonetheless made his dislike of Mussolini and Hitler known in Cabinet, which combined with his soberly distant relationship to the Prime Minister, caused disquiet amongst the Mosleyites, their captain no doubt included [2]. Regardless, during his time as a member of the multi-party Simon Commission, set up to judge the possibility of Indian self-rule in the late 1920s, Attlee had made the acquaintance of numerous Indian businessmen and politicians. Amongst them were Motilal Nehru and his son, Jawaharlal, both leaders in the Indian National Congress.

At the same time as the newly raised Lord Stepney [3] arrived in New Dehli in late May, back home Mosley had begun pushing the gargantuan Government of India Act through Parliament. It became clear the appointment had been at least partially to ensure a speedy march towards Dominion status, something unimaginable under Attlee’s predecessor, the reactionary Lord Willingdon [4]. The Act was the result of years of intensive negotiations and had been the subject of endless debates in the Commons, where hard-line Conservative Members deplored its provisions and claimed that it would lead to the break-up of the Empire. With the resignation of Anthony Eden as Tory leader however, Labour had found the perfect time to get the bill through Parliament with the minimum of controversy, the Conservatives being distracted by choosing a new leader and unable to do much more then rage impotently from the Opposition benches. Immediately after he arrived in India, Stepney made an investigation of the state of the federal negotiations. By June, he reported that “Federation has few enthusiastic friends but few implacable foes”; the Princes “regard it as an unpleasant inevitability but do not welcome it” while Congress “find it a distasteful necessity”. The new Viceroy found himself deluged by Princely demands as concessions for their involvement in federating. Some, like Mysore, wanted abolition of their annual tributes, others wanted tax concessions, boundary changes or even more guns on their salutes. While the Government advised caution so as to avoid “a rising market for the states’ accessions”, it also conceded that federation should be consummated as soon as possible.

impmap_zps728e7aaa-1_zps45476e05.jpg

(L) The Imperial Airship Scheme. (R) The R102 docked at Bedford. August 1933​

Lord Stepney also made history in May 1936 by being the first Viceroy to arrive in India via airship, touching down at the Karachi Aerodrome aboard the gigantic R102 [5]. The event had been covered in depth by the BBC following heavy suggestion from the Air Ministry. Airship production in Britain had suffered a painful development following the Great War. In 1922, Vickers had proposed the Burney Scheme, to provide six commercial airships for passenger service across the Empire. However domestic technology at the time made such a proposal impractical and Ramsay MacDonald’s 1924 Labour government had refused to part-finance the initiative. Instead they had established the Imperial Airship Scheme, a suspiciously similar project but state controlled and bringing in the concerns of diplomatic and military application. As the Government swung between Labour and Conservative control during the 1920s, the issue had become a political football, eventually leading to the construction of not one but two prototype airships. The R100, dubbed the ‘capitalist ship’ produced by Vickers and the R101, the ‘socialist ship’ built by the Royal Airship Works. The official plan called for both ships to provide information and experience for a new class of airship, dubbed Project H [6]. The Scheme had floundered during the political chaos following the Wall Street Crash and with the R101’s aborted maiden flight in late 1930, Baldwin had ordered an indefinite halt to the project [7]. Mosley’s entry into Number 10, and the return of Lord Thomson to the Air Ministry, saw this decision reversed [8].

Thomson had been the Scheme’s prime architect in government since 1924 and was keen to restart it. The Prime Minister was inclined to agree, seeing it as a showcase for British technology and on ideological grounds was interested in Project H’s public-private cooperation. At first little was seen to change. Originally it had been hoped the two prototype ships would begin regular service across the Empire until such time as successors could take over. However the R101’s innovative but unstable design made it of little more than academic value, while the R100’s gasoline engines limited it to Atlantic runs [9]. As such it wasn’t until the unveiling of the R102 in August 1933 and the R103 in June 1934 that a regular Imperial Airship Service to India and Australia could begin. Built in partnership between Vickers and the Royal Airship Works, the new class were the largest craft ever flown. Capable of transporting 150 passengers in luxury and at roughly 9,000,000 cubic feet both dwarfed even Germany’s vaunted Hindenburg [10]. Soon they were joined by the even larger R104 and R105, which extended the Service to Cape Town and Wellington. Combined with refuelling stations in West Africa, Egypt, Kenya and Ceylon, by 1936 the IAS connected almost the entire British Empire. Despite this impressive network, the IAS lacked connections to popular destinations in Latin America and the United States, markets effectively monopolised by their rivals at Goodyear Zeppelin. The IAS ships were also criticised for their cramped quarters and old-fashioned, nautical architecture compared to the Hindenburg’s spacious art-deco styling, and ticket sales struggled. Although trumpeted as a monument to British ingenuity, already the IAS was becoming something of a white elephant.

motorway_zpsda5e93c0.png

The M1 Motorway. 1936​

Transport of a more grounded variety proved a large part of Labour’s economic ‘Push’. Ever since the 1930 Memorandum, Mosley, inspired by Mussolini’s work programmes of the 1920’s, had advocated the construction of motorways across Britain [11]. Construction began on the M1 in 1933, following the passage of the Special Roads Act. The issue proved a surprisingly partisan affair, with the vested interests of the motor and rail industries intervening heavily. William Morris, head of Morris Motors, was an early advocate and had provided Labour with £25,000 in funds for the 1931 General Election [12]. The ‘Big Four’, the corporations which dominated the railways were aghast at the new government’s priorities, which only deepened their pro-Conservative line, embedded since the 1926 General Strike. Morris’ appointment to the National Council in 1934 had been met with grumbles of disapproval from both the Opposition benches and the ILP, and his ennoblement as Lord Nuffield in 1936 led to claims of ministers mixing too closely with business. The Government fobbed off such attacks with the Ministry of Transport confidently predicting the first 1,000 miles of motorway would be completed by 1943. Not long after the beginning of the new parliament however, the Government suffered its first major scandal. J.H. Thomas, the Dominion Secretary, was accused in October 1936 of selling secrets to stock brokers and land speculators regarding taxes and the location of future motorways. The Chief Whip, Frederick Pethick-Lawrence, quickly rounded on Thomas who tearfully admitted to indiscretion.

Highly thought of on both sides of the Commons, the Thomas Affair shocked as much as angered Parliament. Reporters in the gallery witnessed Thomas’ good friend Winston Churchill openly weeping as he made his resignation [13]. While some felt sympathy for Thomas, the discontents in the ILP, led by Fenner Brockway, pointed to the scandal as proof of Labour’s growing subservience to capital. At a meeting of ILP MPs in December, Brockway broached yet again the possibility of disaffiliation with the Labour Party. Maxton, continuously criticised by the Left for his loyalty to Mosley, shouted down the rebels and refused to even consider a vote, to the approval of a thin majority [14]. By the turn of 1937, the Thomas Affair had given way to happier news for the Government as by far the largest of its public works programmes reached completion. The Severn River Barrage, a 2.5 mile dam crossing the mouth of the Bristol Channel was unveiled in March. The barrage had originally reached the Committee stage under the Baldwin Government, and put on hold by the Coalition’s collapse in 1932. The Mosley Government had quickly jumped on the project with vigour, and work had begun by early 1933. Construction was chaotic as money and over 12,000 labourers were thrown at problems to ensure speedy construction, beating the Committee’s 1940 prediction by three years. Although over budget by £10,000,000 and having caused over 100 deaths by its completion (leading Mosley to deem it the “the deadliest barrage I’ve seen since France”), once the up to full power in June 1937, the structure was providing 10% of Britain’s electrical demand, saving 1,000,000 tons of coal annually.

Severn_River_Tidal_Power_Project_1921.JPG

Diagram of the Severn River Barrage in Popular Mechanics. Spring 1937​


[1] Amongst them the new member for Chatham, Hugh Gaitskell
[2] I imagine the conservative Attlee would have left the bombastic Mosley unsure how to deal with him. He’s a team player but there’d be no doubt he isn’t sucked in by the PM’s charisma.
[3] A peerage would be a necessary concession to traditionalists, and given his connection to Limehouse, it seems a suitable choice.
[4] Willingdon was disliked by the Indian populace to put it mildly, and was quite at ease reciprocating the feeling.
[5] This is alternate history, as such airships are mandatory.
[6] All OTL
[7] Due to even more parliamentary chaos than OTL, the R101 is not forced out early leading to its destruction in northern France. However it is still the experimental mess it was in real life and as such never manages the projected Karachi run. This does however save the Imperial Airship Scheme from complete abandonment.
[8] No R101 disaster saves alongside 47 other lives, that of the Labour Air Minister, Lord Thomson. A military officer and moderniser with a rebellious streak, Thomson is Mosley’s kind of man and so has his ear.
[9] Vickers feared using the R100 in tropical climes would lead to explosions and so insisted on only flying to Montreal and Ottawa. A fear they no doubt kept from passengers!
[10] This was Project H’s plan IOTL. There seemed an element of one-upmanship against Zeppelin at the Air Ministry. No doubt this has continued under Lord Thomson and Mosley probably sees it as friendly competition. For those interested Hindenburg came in at just over 7,000,000 cubic feet.
[11] Despite popular assumption otherwise, the first major motorway network in the world was the Italian autostrada, begun in 1924.
[12] When Mosley founded the New Party IOTL, Morris gave him £50,000 based on his pro-motorway stance. ITTL I imagine Mosley’s apparent socialism makes him offer a smaller endorsement.
[13] This is all basically OTL, not including the motorways. Thomas went with MacDonald to form the National Government, but here in a very similar situation I imagine he would still fall prey to temptation. He was also well liked, and despite being a gruff trade unionist was an apparently good friend of George V amongst countless others.
[14] The ILP in reality disaffiliated from Labour in 1931. Here however, the group is far more diverse, and Mosley is himself technically a member, meaning there is a strong core of loyalists keeping the ILP pinned to the Party. This might not last however…
 
Last edited:
When Adolf beings to make some noise, I fear that Mosley may be too busy with too many issues...
 
Love the bit on the airships, but how the hell did Gaitskell manage to win an extra 5900-odd votes at Chatham?!
 
*Chuckles at mandatory airships*
 
The Severn River Barrage, a 2.5 mile dam crossing the mouth of the Bristol Channel was unveiled in March. The barrage had originally reached the Committee stage under the Baldwin Government, and put on hold by the Coalition’s collapse in 1932. The Mosley Government had quickly jumped on the project with vigour, and work had begun by early 1933. Construction was chaotic as money and over 12,000 labourers were thrown at problems to ensure speedy construction, beating the Committee’s 1940 prediction by three years. Although over budget by £10,000,000 and having caused over 100 deaths by its completion (leading Mosley to deem it the “the deadliest barrage I’ve seen since France”), once the up to full power in June 1937, the structure was providing 10% of Britain’s electrical demand, saving 1,000,000 tons of coal annually.
I'll admit I was expecting disaster from Mosley and I'm delighted to see he has not disappointed. That scheme will be an utter, unmitigated catastrophe on every level; economic, environmental, political and social.

Based on the last set of studies I give that barrage maybe a decade before the silting starts becoming a serious problem, though it will probably only take a year or two before it starts reducing efficiency. Long before then it will have killed off pretty much all marine and bird life east of the barrage and done who knows how much damage to life further up the Severn, not to mention turning the barrage area into a fairly unpleasant festering pool of industrial and domestic waste that just can't be flushed out. Depending on how badly it screws up the currents near Avonmouth Bristol may well be quite nasty to live in, Gloucester is probably in trouble either way.

Given the state of power storage in 1930s Britain (nothing) and assuming it's like OTL and is an ebb tide scheme (i.e. only generates power on the ebb tide) there will be problems as the power generation period will move with the tides. Generating all that power during the middle of the night is not much use to man nor beast and there's no pumped storage schemes to store it up till needed. Mind you that's not quite as big a problem as it appears as that quoted power output will only be for the spring tides, the rest of the year the tides are lower and so is the power generation.

For all that Mosley is probably going to be relieved the scheme isn't any good at actual producing power or he could be in serious problems with the coal mining industry, taking a million tonnes of coal demand out of the system will not be popular with anyone. As the UK coal industry in the 1930s had a massive over-production problem (or to put it another way it was not politically possible to close dozens of small, inefficient and expensive pits across South Wales and Scotland) there was an elaborate system of quotas to keep everyone going, this barrage will mean another big drop in quotas, possibly to the point where some pits have to close as their quota is just too small to be practical. Even if they do struggle on there will be wage drops for miner (pay was per ton and that's the way the owners and the miners wanted it) and mine owners will been even less likely to invest in new technology, just storing up even more problems for the industry in the future and further damaging the economy as antiquated UK mines lose export markets to modern mines elsewhere.

So a vast expenditure in lives and money for a scheme that will just make everything worse for everyone. Well done Mosley for living down to my lowest expectations!
 
After reading El Pip I've taken a look at the map of the barrage and I begin to suspect that Oswald has made a mistake in his personal vendetta against William Woodsworth ;)
 
Kurt_Steiner: Heh, you're not far off.

Sandino: Well as hinted it seems you can. Its sad, Britain jumps on a 'modern' bandwagon at the exact time its falling into inevitable decline. Oh and yes Spain will be appearing soon.

Tanzhang (譚張): Thank you. I had to include it both for fun and highlighting how close such a terrible idea got to fruition, naturally it seemed fine at the time but the Imperial Airship Service will prove a headache for years to come.

On Gaitskell, TTL's 1936 election is completely different to the 1935 election. First of all Chatham was an odd battleground seat in that it tended to swing to the overall winner of a general election but by quite large margins, IOTL Labour had held it with convincing majorities on two separate occasions after the War before the Conservatives under the National Government banner won it in 1931. Secondly ITTL Labour is more centrist (appealing to the relatively non-tribal electorate in Chatham) and has an incumbent advantage due to the popularity of the Mosleyite reforms so far. Conversely the Conservatives are a bit of a mess and also can't count on the support of non-Labour voters as the 'National' party in the constituency, meaning Liberal (and National Labour) supporters will be more inclined to vote Labour here. All in all I suspect Gaitskell came in with a small but respectable majority, probably hovering around 1,000 votes.

c0d5579: Happy to be of service.

El Pip: And hello to you too! I feel you're being overly critical of the design, though you are right on the effect on mining, it's never mentioned in the original story due to the specific focus of the tale but I've been reading up and (now) intend to deal to with it in a future update. On everything else, I included the barrage purely in the name of having something fun and huge to get over the New Deal vibe, and while I'm sure you're far more educated on the issue than I, I feel from my own reading you're throwing quite a bit of hyperbole at the design.

1) Wildlife will suffer terribly but this is the 1930s so Westminster doesn't care/know enough on the issue. Which will also no doubt hurt fisherman considerably. However in some reports its suggested the overall change in river speed, and sinking of sediment will off set the worst of fish kill and the knock on effect on birds though it seems purely academic as the Severn has quite a unique ecosystem so unless attempted the reports seem to be unsure.
2) I've read that a barrage would, by slowing the speed of the Severn, lead to sediment falling to the river bed, avoiding that problem. It will no doubt effect the project over time but my reading on the idea both then and now suggests a few years to be quite an extreme prediction. Similar real projects have taken many decades to even begin to suffer from sediment build-up.
3) The Severn River has the second greatest tidal range of any river on Earth, combined with the daily release of water into the Irish Sea how would that cause the river to turn stagnant?
4) From my reading, primitive power storage for the barrage was provided by the design of a Russian emigre called Paul Shishkov, who tested a prototype in 1931 that allowed energy to from daily ebb to be spread over 24 hours. Indeed it was his mechanism that encouraged the Government to take the idea seriously IOTL. Also I believe the reservoir on the picture in my update is intended for pump storage as well.

I admit that could all be garbage but its what I got from my (limited) research. Though thank you for the intense feedback, I would have completely forgotten about the knock on effect on coal which should be interesting, in the Chinese sense. Oh and...

5) Yes Mosley is a bit of a prick. If some dead seagulls upset you, you'll be foaming at the mouth by the time this AAR is over.

Kurt_Steiner (2): I'm not up on my Wordsworth I'm afraid, could you explain?
 
Kurt_Steiner (2): I'm not up on my Wordsworth I'm afraid, could you explain?

Indeed. Wordsworth wrote a poem tittled "Lines written a few miles above Tintern Abbey", a ruined abbey in Wales. When I took a look on the map and saw Tintern Abbey there I remembered that poem and how I hated it (sorry, W. W!). :p
 
El Pip: And hello to you too! I feel you're being overly critical of the design.
Nope, it's just a terrible, terrible design.

1) I agree no-one in 1930s will care, doesn't mean it isn't true. Evidence from the OTL large barrages all suggests utter eco devastation will result.

2) If you do slow the speed of the Severn you have a far bigger problem; you've just flooded most of Gloucester, Tewkesbury and anywhere else on the Severn. You've got a Volume of water (V) going into the Severn basin, the Severn moves this at a speed (S) in a river channel size (C). You slow the Severn you've reduced S but V hasn't changed, thus C has to get bigger, so the Sever bursts it's banks and floods everywhere nearby as it can't shift the water fast enough. It would solve the silting problem I'll grant you, but it seems an expensive way of doing it. If you don't slow the Severn till the barrage you will silt it up, compare the '87 Hooker barrage which was developed specifically to address silting with the 1930s option, they're both across the same part of the Severn with a similar installed capacity but are quite impressively different. There are good reasons for that.

3) The sea side of the barrage will be fine (possibly, depends on exact configuration), the river side not so much. Basically everything that gets dumped into the Severn, which in the 1930s is everything from raw sewerage to untreated industrial discharge builds up behind the barrage. As the water slows and sits in the barrage waiting for the next time all the muck settles out (along with all the silt), the concentrations build up and the polluted area spreads up river as more and more muck get dumped. I'm thinking of the Sihwa Lake barrage in South Korea which became quite horrifically polluted barely 3 years after the plant opened, it had to be quite expensively modified in order to allow regular 'flushing out' with sea water to try and clear the filth. And that's from a country with a modern(ish) sewerage system and some pretence of environmental protection, two things 1930s Britain is lacking, it may not even make it three years.

4) No it didn't, at least not in any useful sense. Shishkoff's design was over-complicated, expensive, horrifically inefficient and didn't actually provide constant 24hr power. The system aimed to store the energy as heated water then use that heat to make steam and turn a turbine. However as the water cooled, steam generation fell and the power output dropped, so it was just as 'peaky' as tidal power, just with a different shaped curve. To be fair it did mean you could not use the hot water till you wanted power, but of course it was cooing all the time so you were 'losing' power the longer you didn't use it. There are good reasons why no-one ever used his design, they are the same good reasons why once the government looked at his 'innovative' storage scheme they dropped the entire idea, it just wasn't any good. None of the modern barrier designs consider it and with good reason. Of course with some funky molten salt technology and so on it might work, but sadly they wont be around till the late 1990s.

A quick look at a relief map shows that reservoir is too small, too low and of course there is only one of them when a pumped storage scheme needs two. And no you can't use a river for a pumped storage scheme, or at least not for a scheme that's going to be any good. As a comparison when the government built Dinorwig pumped scheme in North Wales it took ten years, they mined out 12 million tonnes of rock and used 1 million tonnes of concrete to make over ten miles of tunnel and cavern. Of course Mosley could try and build something similar, but with 1930s mining technology it'll take far longer, cost more and make the Barrage scheme look like a shining beacon of health and safety.

5) I wont be foaming, I expected him to be awful for Britain and thus far he has been. I must say I'm looking forward to his 'solution' to the coal mining issue, on current form I expect it will involve misery, poverty and death.

EDIT - Glad to see you took the barrage rant in the right spirit, looking back I probably should have said something about how I was enjoying the read. Just in case that wasn't obvious I'll say it now - good work and keep it up.
 
Kurt_Steiner: Ah, so I can imagine the Wordsworth Appreciation Society picketed the opening of the reservoir then!

El Pip: I know it just your way of saying you love me Pip, fear not. I'll accept all that as you're obviously more educated on the subject, let's pretend enough engineering innovation was brought in to make the Barrage work enough not to cause an immediate apocalypse in the Greater Bristol Area. Also its Popular Mechanics it was never a bastion of empirical excellence. Can I ask are you an engineer yourself? You obviously have strong knowledge and I remember assuming it by other comments you've made in other threads (I remember you cursed Disraeli in my old British AAR for taking credit for the London Sewage System).

However it was all very fascinating stuff so I've noted it down and I'll make sure sometime north of 1940 we'll see the horrible side effects of Modern Progress!

---
Update will be over the weekend, as I have a new job which has meant my accustomed free time has now vanished.
 
I suppose you do have a point about Chatham, after all it was/is one of the few places in that part of the world which has consistently remained a Lab/Con contest, even throughout the 80's. However, would it really be right to call Mosley's economic policies "centrist" for the 1930's? Regardless how mainstream or commonsensical they may seem today (or at least before Thatcher) they would surely have been considered radical for their day, hence Snowden's reaction to the memorandum in OTL.
 
El Pip: I know it just your way of saying you love me Pip, fear not. I'll accept all that as you're obviously more educated on the subject, let's pretend enough engineering innovation was brought in to make the Barrage work enough not to cause an immediate apocalypse in the Greater Bristol Area. Also its Popular Mechanics it was never a bastion of empirical excellence. Can I ask are you an engineer yourself? You obviously have strong knowledge and I remember assuming it by other comments you've made in other threads (I remember you cursed Disraeli in my old British AAR for taking credit for the London Sewage System).

However it was all very fascinating stuff so I've noted it down and I'll make sure sometime north of 1940 we'll see the horrible side effects of Modern Progress!
I suppose if no-one's got a pumped storage scheme in place then the engineers in charge of the barrage may not actually turn the scheme on when the tides in the wrong place, that should delay the worst of the problems as the tide will still occasionally move naturally(ish) through the estuary. It will still be a disaster of course, but it'll unfold at a slower rate. Good enough for writing purposes?

I'm a tunnel engineer so I've worked on a few hydro-electric and pumped storage schemes. I also occasionally catch up with an old colleague who worked on one of the Severn Barrage proposals and came away very impressed with both the engineering challenges and the ecological death toll.
 
I loved the detail here, and would like to see it continue(begin?)!

Is there any possibility of progress? I for one would love it. I'm sure others would as well. *crosses fingers***