+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: A.I. Muslims

  1. #1
    On Probation
    EU3 CompleteVictoria 2Divine WindCrusader Kings IIVictoria II: A House Divided
    Crusader Kings II Holy KnightMarch of the Eagles

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    British North America
    Posts
    2,556

    A.I. Muslims

    For those of you who played D&T 5.xx and D&T 7.xx/8.xx, what's your opinion on the relative strengths of the A.I. Muslims? Do you think there's a big difference? Which setup do you prefer?

    As I've said in other threads, I consider the Muslims in 5.xx to be far more powerful than the Muslims in later versions. Do you think A.I. Muslims need to be tweaked to be more threatening? If so, what are some of the possible ideas that can be considered?

    Note: This is a casual discussion thread. It is not necessarily a feature request. If certain parties disagree with the ideas, please ignore this thread and refrain from launching a tirade and say "End of Discussion". Thanks.

  2. #2
    Lt. General cacra's Avatar
    Victoria 2EU3: ChroniclesHearts of Iron III Collection

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    puɐlƃuƎ
    Posts
    1,491
    I think the Ottomans in particular should be more powerful especially into the middle of the 16th century. After all it took most of central eurpe and spain to defeat them. But apart from them I don't think the rest of the muslim world really needs to be more powerful.

  3. #3
    On Probation
    EU3 CompleteVictoria 2Divine WindCrusader Kings IIVictoria II: A House Divided
    Crusader Kings II Holy KnightMarch of the Eagles

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    British North America
    Posts
    2,556
    Quote Originally Posted by cacra View Post
    I think the Ottomans in particular should be more powerful especially into the middle of the 16th century. After all it took most of central eurpe and spain to defeat them. But apart from them I don't think the rest of the muslim world really needs to be more powerful.
    I say the Mamluks and the dominant Ilkhanate successor state should be stronger.

  4. #4
    Lt. General cacra's Avatar
    Victoria 2EU3: ChroniclesHearts of Iron III Collection

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    puɐlƃuƎ
    Posts
    1,491
    The mamluks were getting pushed around by the ottomans by the 16th century but before that they were fairly equal. And I couldnt comment on the persian region, I really dont know much about it.

  5. #5
    On Probation
    EU3 CompleteVictoria 2Divine WindCrusader Kings IIVictoria II: A House Divided
    Crusader Kings II Holy KnightMarch of the Eagles

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    British North America
    Posts
    2,556
    What happens in the 16th century is not that important anyway, since the issue is that both are pretty weak even in the 1400's (during game).

  6. #6
    Megalomaniac birdboy2000's Avatar
    Diplomacy PlayerEU3 OwnerNapoleonic MarshalDeus Vult!Europa Universalis: Rome
    Victoria: RevolutionsEuropa Universalis III: In NomineRome: Vae VictisHearts of Iron IIISupreme Ruler 2020 Gold
    For The GloryHeir to the Throne200k ClubSemper FiVictoria 2
    Divine WindCrusader Kings IISengokuVictoria II: A House DividedCrusader Kings II Holy Knight

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    1,432
    Depends on when you start. Playing from 1356 they're way too weak. Playing from 1453 they do fine.

    But yeah, most games are from 1356, and there the Ottomans need beefing up if they're ever going to be more than another Anatolian beylik. (I haven't played in long enough that I don't want to make comparisons, though.) Russia rolled over the hordes and into Persia/Afghanistan too easily, too, but that's more lopsided tech than anything.

  7. #7
    On Probation
    EU3 CompleteVictoria 2Divine WindCrusader Kings IIVictoria II: A House Divided
    Crusader Kings II Holy KnightMarch of the Eagles

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    British North America
    Posts
    2,556
    Quote Originally Posted by birdboy2000 View Post
    Depends on when you start. Playing from 1356 they're way too weak. Playing from 1453 they do fine.

    But yeah, most games are from 1356, and there the Ottomans need beefing up if they're ever going to be more than another Anatolian beylik. (I haven't played in long enough that I don't want to make comparisons, though.) Russia rolled over the hordes and into Persia/Afghanistan too easily, too, but that's more lopsided tech than anything.
    Russia usually gets beaten into a pulp by Lithuania.

  8. #8
    Megalomaniac birdboy2000's Avatar
    Diplomacy PlayerEU3 OwnerNapoleonic MarshalDeus Vult!Europa Universalis: Rome
    Victoria: RevolutionsEuropa Universalis III: In NomineRome: Vae VictisHearts of Iron IIISupreme Ruler 2020 Gold
    For The GloryHeir to the Throne200k ClubSemper FiVictoria 2
    Divine WindCrusader Kings IISengokuVictoria II: A House DividedCrusader Kings II Holy Knight

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    1,432
    Does Lithuania also roll over the hordes and start causing problems for Persia? I've only played one recent 1356 game, where the two partitioned them but then Russia turned and beat Lithuania.

  9. #9
    On Probation
    EU3 CompleteVictoria 2Divine WindCrusader Kings IIVictoria II: A House Divided
    Crusader Kings II Holy KnightMarch of the Eagles

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    British North America
    Posts
    2,556
    Quote Originally Posted by birdboy2000 View Post
    Does Lithuania also roll over the hordes and start causing problems for Persia? I've only played one recent 1356 game, where the two partitioned them but then Russia turned and beat Lithuania.
    Muscovy usually gets beaten into a pulp by TGH and/or Lithuania. Usually, the only thing that can destroy Lithuania is a war with Austria or an emperor Blobhemia.

    Persia usually gets conquered by the Ilkhanate successor.

  10. #10
    Lt. General cacra's Avatar
    Victoria 2EU3: ChroniclesHearts of Iron III Collection

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    puɐlƃuƎ
    Posts
    1,491
    I've never seen that happen, in my games Muscovy or Novogrod either dominate each other or end up in status quo. Although once I did see Brandenburg touch the North pacific. However I am going to change my opinion i think in the earlier game the muslim nations should be beefed up. Not only would it arguably be more historically accurate it would represent the struggles between east and west and could possibly lead to parts of Europe being conquered by the muslims which imo was not entirely out of the realm of possibility.

  11. #11
    I just had the Ottomans conquer themselves a pretty nice empire, keeping up in tech with Austria and France. In any case, having them in the same culture group as the greeks is probably not helping them. There's only a handful of greek provinces, while the number of arab provinces is far greater. If they don't time things properly, they end up not accepting the mashriqis and sometimes not even the egyptians (because they often don't conquer egypt proper) and the bedouins never gain accepted status. They also don't get cores from PUs. Pretty massive nerf right there. They do have the azeris in their culture group now, but that's pretty inconsequential, since they never conquer any of their stuff. Still, they're doing ok-ish. As for the other Muslims, it's not as easy for them (crappy tech and not as many free cores and stuff).

  12. #12
    I think there should be an optional mode where the muslim AIs are out to get Christian Europe. Just to see what happens.
    "Mankind must put an end to war or war will put an end to mankind." - John F. Kennedy

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts