• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
You'd rather build bombs then feed the poor and heal the sick and yet you call us godless? Let me also remind you that depriving non-christians and LGBT citizens of their natural rights is a direct violation of our 14th amendment!
 
What I support is individual rights to all Americans. America is a nation filled with Christan, but it is not a Christian Nation. Our government is secular, and I intend to keep it that way. I support the rights for Men and Women to marry who they wish, the Government has no say in that. As for your idea of accusing me of taking from the Hardworking and giving to the Lazy, please point out this in my platform, and I will clarify what exactly it is, and how you have misinterpreted it.
 
I would like to attempt to run for the Presidency this year, but seeing as there are already so many Republicans doing so, I will sit it out for this time.

~ Senator Justin Reynolds
 
Medicare and Medicaid
Medicare and Medicaid should be reformed to try and make sure they are no longer fiscal holes.
Any system that takes my hard-earned money away from me and gives it to a Homeless drug addict or some spoiled 100 year old who saved nothing for retirement is Socialism to me, and any reform is not going to change that.

You'd rather build bombs then feed the poor and heal the sick and yet you call us godless? Let me also remind you that depriving non-christians and LGBT citizens of their natural rights is a direct violation of our 14th amendment!

I'd rather kill some of the most objectively evil people in Creation than allow people to continue to be a drain on Society, yes. And what rights am I depriving sinners from? The right for Sodomites to get married is pointless as marriage is, has been, and always will be between one man and one woman. And the right to not get taxed, which is the only thing I plan on doing to non-Christians, is obviously not a thing that exists.
 
Any system that takes my hard-earned money away from me and gives it to a Homeless drug addict or some spoiled 100 year old who saved nothing for retirement is Socialism to me, and any reform is not going to change that.

When you turn 65, you are eligible to collect from Medicare. You pay into the system, and then you take out when it is time. It is the same as Social Security. As for Medicaid, what about the 70-year old Grandmother who's husband died, and is stuck with a grave illness? What about the family that is low income, and their child is suddenly diagnosed with Cancer? What you propose is the farthest thing from anything Christian. Your idea of running this country is to let people to fend for themselves who cannot fend for themselves. Private Charity can do a lot, but the Government can and MUST help those who cannot help themselves.
 
I vote for myself, Senator Scott Brown.
 
In these cases I must defer to the motto of one of the Boy Scouts of America: Be Prepared. They should have still been saving, or getting Life Insurance or not having a child that they couldn't afford. Illnesses and deaths are just part of God's plan for us, and who are we to go against that plan. And regarding Medicare, the money for that is going to run out before most Americans retire, so it's the matter of disappointment now, or catastrophe later. I find it humorous how you Communists who are always going on about your "Theory of Evolution" can't understand the implications it has in sociology. And referring to my policies as "Not Christian" is a blatant No True Scotsman fallacy
 
Why vote for more government, or for more war? Vote for less government and less war; vote Charles Huntington in this Republican Primary, and this November.

I would not call Senator Brown a socialist; indeed, he may favour a great deal more government than I would like to see in place, he is much more sensible than our Democratic opponent. Furthermore, your attacks on gay rights, and your unfounded promotion of state religion is a danger to this nation. But the real issue is that neither of you oppose the war, unlike myself. I fought in Iraq, and I've seen the devastation it's caused, the devastation of an undeclared war waged illegally and for no good reason.

((Frymonmon, I liked your layout, so I stole it...))
 
Why vote for more government, or for more war? Vote for less government and less war; vote Charles Huntington in this Republican Primary, and this November.

I would not call Senator Brown a socialist; indeed, he may favour a great deal more government than I would like to see in place, he is much more sensible than our Democratic opponent. Furthermore, your attacks on gay rights, and your unfounded promotion of state religion is a danger to this nation. But the real issue is that neither of you oppose the war, unlike myself. I fought in Iraq, and I've seen the devastation it's caused, the devastation of an undeclared war waged illegally and for no good reason.

((Frymonmon, I liked your layout, so I stole it...))

((I think we are actually doing the Presidential Election.))
 
Few things:

A. I also support an end to the wars in the midle east
B. The republicans are so divided they cannot even choose a candidate. We need a strong party in Washington.
C. In my earlier post, I meant you are taking away one of the two ideas that make America great: freedom of belief. The other one is freedom of action. Just a clarification.
D. Senetar Brown is a Republican. Just because he is running as independent does not change his actual party and beliefs.

OOC: Sen. Scott, you can't create your own party without more people.
 
((Well, it might be, but it says to vote for the four candidates, so I guess it's a coronation for the Democrats, and a primary fight for the GOP))

You may support ending the war, but will you withdraw our troops from Israel, from Japan, from Germany, from across the globe? Will you oppose a war with Iran?
 
Few things:

A. I also support an end to the wars in the midle east
B. The republicans are so divided they cannot even choose a candidate. We need a strong party in Washington.
C. In my earlier post, I meant you are taking away one of the two ideas that make America great: freedom of belief. The other one is freedom of action. Just a clarification.
D. Senetar Brown is a Republican. Just because he is running as independent does not change his actual party and beliefs.

OOC: Sen. Scott, you can't create your own party without more people.

There will be no new parties except if something really RADICAL happens, and only if I allow it. You can make a new faction in one's party if one wants to.
 
OOC: I am running more or less as an Independent Republican. A new faction in the Party.