+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Why bother with Destroyers?

  1. #1

    Why bother with Destroyers?

    Why bother with destroyers? Light Cruisers are relatively the same cost in IC but better at killing surface ships and acting as a screen. I have also been told the destroyer techs are largely useless, particularly upgrading the hull of destroyers. One other thing to consider is the fact that light cruisers share the same tech tree as aircraft carriers. Can destroyers be characterized as nothing more than sub hunters?

  2. #2
    Major wesleytj's Avatar
    Arsenal of DemocracyHearts of Iron 2: ArmageddonEU3 CompleteFor the MotherlandHearts of Iron III
    HOI3: Their Finest HourEuropa Universalis: RomeSemper FiVictoria 2Victoria II: A House Divided

    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Terre Haute, Indiana, United States
    Posts
    678
    if you anticipate facing a lot of subs from your enemy, then destroyers will perform better for you than light cruisers. If not, then you're better off with light cruisers. Simple as that.
    _________________________
    Chinese Relativity Axiom: No matter how great your achievments, or how miserable your failures, there will always be at least 1 billion people in China who won't give a damn.

  3. #3
    Convicted Drive-by Poster Pro_Consul's Avatar
    EU3 CompleteFor the MotherlandHearts of Iron IIIVictoria: RevolutionsSemper Fi
    Mount & Blade: With Fire and Sword

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    4,041
    Quote Originally Posted by Redstars89 View Post
    Light Cruisers are relatively the same cost in IC but better at killing surface ships and acting as a screen.
    Better at killing surface ships, yes. Better at acting as a screen, no; that is a wash more or less. And it is not the "same" cost in IC. CLs cost 40% more than DDs in IC-days.

    Quote Originally Posted by Redstars89 View Post
    I have also been told the destroyer techs are largely useless, particularly upgrading the hull of destroyers.
    Nonsense. DD techs are as useful to DDs as CL techs are to CLs. They are the source of their mission range, AA, detection, sea attack and sub attack abilities.

    Quote Originally Posted by Redstars89 View Post
    One other thing to consider is the fact that light cruisers share the same tech tree as aircraft carriers.
    Actually, they don't. Each is a requirement for a single one-time doctrinal tech. Other than that their techs are totally separate from each other, both ship techs and doctrines. In addition, DDs have the same relationship with BBs, so if you are building a BB-based navy, then DDs occupy the same position in this regard that CLs do for carrier-based fleets.

    Quote Originally Posted by Redstars89 View Post
    Can destroyers be characterized as nothing more than sub hunters?
    No. Destroyers, with their higher speed, make the best screens for BBs. They increase the average fleet speed, which greatly enhances the ability of the group to close to gun range with the enemy or, when appropriate, escape a bad engagement. They can also be used for a similar purpose with CVs, if maximizing mission range is not a critical issue.
    An Englishman thinks a hundred miles is a long way. An American thinks a hundred years is a long time. I am beginning to think a hundred dollars is a lot of money. Two of these facts are interesting. All of them are revealing. But only one of them is truly pathetic.

    Member of the Ahistoric Association

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts