IX
Litvian state and culture in the second half of the XIII century
Alexei I's reign saw the finalization of the process that begun with Volodar's ascencion to the Polish throne in 1203. The gradual integration of several peoples resulted in the birth of a uniqie mixture.
Population
Shortly before his death in 1276, Alexei ordered a first population census to be conducted in Litva. Although many researchers question the exact numbers acquired in the process, I believe we can saftely use them to estimate Litvian population as of 1282 (when the census was completed):
Curiously enough, the ethnical borders have proven to be very stable; even the originally pagan Balts have managed to retain their distinctive language and traditions, influencing the initially purely Russian conquerors instead. Historians mostly explain this phenomena with Litvian state's religious policy; as long as an individual converted to orthodoxy, he or she had an open way to polotskian court, titles and honours.
Language
Not surprisingly, such ethnical combination resulted in the cultural diversity of Litvian nobility. Russian, Polish, Lettgalian, Prussian and Czech sounded in the corridors of the royal palace in Polotsk - equal and indiscriminated. However, during Alexei's reign, the linguistical evolution led to the development of a distinctive language - the so-called Litvian langugage.
Litvian - a curious mixture of Russian, Lettgalian, Polish and (to some extent) Czech became the unifying factero for the nobility, although it never spread to lower strats - the peasantry and most brughers continued using their original languages, while the clergy remained true to the Old Slavic and Greek, both used in liturgy and worship. This resulted in the administration becoming increasingly bilingual - with local clerks forced to use Litvian in bureaucracy and regional languages when dealing with commoners.
Thus, the Litvian language slowly drifted away from regular Russian, becoming a largely independent language, although both are roughly understandable to one another's speakers. Baltic influence turned out to be limited to vocabulary alone - leaving most Slavic grammar intact. Later Polish and Czech influence failed to leave a significant influence on the Litvian - being limited to single words like горале (gorale, from Polish górale, highlanders) or пивовар (pivovar, from Czech, brewery).
Religion
Contrary to cultural tolerance, the Litvian administration was most eager to endorse religious unit whenever possible. Combined with the papal crisis in the XII and XIII century, and the rapid expansion of the Byzantine Empire (which in turn strenghtened the Constantinople patriarchy), such policy resulted in the Polish and Czechs quickly abandoning the roman catholicism to orthodoxy. Curiously, the gap in influence between the Pope and the patriarch was so huge, that even the Steel Edict did not prevent the population of Nurnberg converting to orthodoxy
en masse in the wake of Alexei I's conquest of Moravia.
Metropolit Iona, who organised orthodox missions to Poland in mid-XIII century
Nevertheless, one should note that the Byzantine and Litvian variations of the orthodox creed have gradually started derivating - which turned out to be the base for the so-called "Litvian schism" in the late XV century.
Politics
The head of the Litvian state was the tsar, crowned each time by the patriarch or - as in Volodar's case - the metropolit of Polotsk. The most important regalia was the Triple Crown - a golden jewelry masterpiece, decorated with sapphires, rubies and emeralds, representing Ruthenia, Poland and Litva respectively. Alexei I's coronation established a practice followed by his successors - with multiple celebrations taking place in various cities across the realm. Polotsk, Kraków and Kiev were always on such list - other cities varied according to tsar's personal sympathies and political interests.
The tsar had the power to create hereditary princes (lit. князь, knyaz'), who represented his power in the field. In theory, each knyaz' had a clearly attributed domain - but petty intrigues and plots often resulted in nobles acquiring lands outside their
de jure sphere of influence. One such feud occured during the late part of Alexei's reign, with knyaz' Alexander of Silesia acquiring analogical titles in Livonya and Kurlandya.
The knyaz'es on their own had the power to nominates kunigases - who administered individual provinces. Only few kunigases - like Ciro of Boleslav - were subordinated to the tsar personally. The kunigases were hereditary as well, although they rarely managed to exceed their powers in a way knyaz'es did.
Curiously, such feudal ladder caused little vertical conflicts (i.e. knyaz' rebellions against the tsar), while the lack of control mechanisms caused a lot of horizontal infighting between the knyaz'es. Perhaps the only large-scale rebellion of Alexei I's time was the war of Małgorzata, princess of Wielkopolska. Claiming the throne of Poland as a distant relative to Jacek II, the princess waged war against Alexei in 1271-1273. The conflict ended with her and her young son Andrzej being cast into polotskian dungeon, were they both died in 1275.
Economy
Recovery of the eastern lands, as well as stabilization of the Litvo-Greek border after the Treaty of Kiev, have allowed trade to once again flow safetly along the Dnieper. The Russian cities enjoyed a period of rapid growth and expansion, and new villages have been established. Even though the Litvians never took the "pearl" of the
Gardariki (nordic "Land of the cities") - Novgorod - their control over Vsleslav, Dvinsk and Polotsk soon impoverished the Mongol-devastated metropolis, with Polotsk taking its place as the chief centre of trade in the north.
If Dnieper was Litvian "backbone", then western Ruthenia and Poland may saftely be called its "belly". Fertile soils of these lands have been turned into vast farmlands, with crops produced being exported to Germany, France and Scandinavia. Controlled by a royal monopoly, the "green gold" contibuted greatly to Litvian military and territorial expansion.
Military
In organisation, the Litvian army did not differ from other medieval european forces - it was a product of feudal system, composed of mass peasant levies, aided by elite noble forces - the so-called дружина (lit. druzhina, a company). The main force consisted of a heavy infantry core, with small cavalry regiments acting as reconnaisance and pursuit groups. This gave the Litvian army sufficient strike force to decimate infantry-based armies with ease - but made it lack flexibility to adjust to the dynamic pace of steppe warfare. Some scholars believe that the crushing victory at Minsk in 1251 would not have been possible, should rain fail to immobilize the Mongols.
Typical Litvian infantryman of Alexei the Great's times