Not possible to my knowledge.
Modifiers can affect manpower though, I'm pretty sure.
Suggestions for Improved Moddability
- Thread starter Meneth
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Modifiers can affect manpower though, I'm pretty sure.
Not sure if it is in, but... make some province modifiers work for buildings. For example:
local_revolt_risk
local_revolt_risk
Quite a nice list that. I suppose I'll update the OP.
Edit: The only one I can find that actually addresses anything on the list is the is_at_sea condition.
Edit: The only one I can find that actually addresses anything on the list is the is_at_sea condition.
.png){kind=avatar}
Oh, what about these:
Ultimogeniture succession law (youngest child inherits). Was historically used by the Mongols
Allow naming titles by the culture of the holder (E.G., "the English Empire")
Cultural/religious title names (E.G., different name for Sicily if it is owned by Muslims than if by Christians) (maybe with the above?)
Not to my knowledge.
Ah, yeah. Those weren't on the For Modders list though
I'll add them.
There are now also Dynasty flags (was this before? Hm... if yes, the text sounds like some changes). But paradox use it in a nice way.
Last edited:
on_birth is in the patch, replacing on_bastard_birth and it works for ALL births indeed
Added.
Moved everything from 1.09 into the Implemented Suggestions list, now that the patch is out.
Moved everything from 1.09 into the Implemented Suggestions list, now that the patch is out.
A "Replace patrician family" or "Add patrician family", "Delete Patrician Family" command for events!
I think it would be nice if Paradox had less restrictions on modding, and more tools to use for modding. That way projects like Skyrim's USKP could come about. Bethesda releases some of the most bugged games ever, but since Bethesda has relaxed modding rules and gives the community tools for modding, the community is able to fix many bugs on their own.
I will be exporting a bunch of stuff to defines in the near future. I've pulled this list...
... and most of it should be doable, but if theres anything else you want exported to defines I'd go ahead and suggest it now.
... and most of it should be doable, but if theres anything else you want exported to defines I'd go ahead and suggest it now.
Last edited:
Excellent! Seems to actually be most of the things I've thought of while looking around the files in the past. Allowing the % of counties needed to form a particular title to have both a default value and the ability for it to be overwritten in the landed titles would be great. It'd allow duchy/kingdom/empire creation to be able to be made more difficult for specific duchies/kingdoms/empires. I'm sure there's lots more things that it'd be great to have but I haven't really poked around in the files long enough to know what isn't moddable anyway. Thanks for the amount of stuff that is already, I do enjoy tweaking the values to create interesting gameplay and I'm sure the makers of more popular mods do as well.
Last edited:
I see the very first item on the first post list is to be able to add new types of holding, if I visibly show my support for it does it increase the chances that Paradox will make it so? That would be great.
