Home Trending Latest threads New posts Developer diaries

Suggestions for Improved Moddability

Jump to latest Follow Reply
  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Crusader Kings II 69868 Bug Reports 19707 User Modifications 10588 Suggestions 5969 Tech Support 6361 After Action Reports
Show only dev responses
tompalmer said:
And now ?

Add to the request : MIN_PREGNANCY_AGE
Click to expand...
Well, I did get a look through once. Can't say I actually saw anything on this list that was implemented in 1.07, though I might've missed something.
Adding that to the list.
 
Being able to change around which religions are mainstream and which are heresies during gameplay ( ATM it is very buggy if you try it with more than one religion)
 
Bad_Haggis said:
Being able to change around which religions are mainstream and which are heresies during gameplay ( ATM it is very buggy if you try it with more than one religion)
Click to expand...
Actual bugs should be reported rather than posted here ;)
 
I couldn't see anything about specifying betrothals and matrilineal marriages in the history files, or have I missed it?

I'd also like ultimogeniture, but that could probably be implemented for the Mongols as opposed to just being added for modders to use. Either way it'd be a great addition to the game.
 
Sleight of Hand said:
I couldn't see anything about specifying betrothals and matrilineal marriages in the history files, or have I missed it?
Click to expand...
Matrilineal marriage is done by setting spouse from the woman's perspective to my knowledge.
I'll add betrothals to the list.

I'd also like ultimogeniture, but that could probably be implemented for the Mongols as opposed to just being added for modders to use. Either way it'd be a great addition to the game.
Click to expand...
What's ultimogeniture?
 
Meneth said:
Matrilineal marriage is done by setting spouse from the woman's perspective to my knowledge.
I'll add betrothals to the list.
Click to expand...
I've heard this mentioned but wasn't aware that it was confirmed. I'll have to check. Do you know if it works consistently?

Meneth said:
What's ultimogeniture?
Click to expand...
Essentially the reverse of primogeniture, whereby the youngest son/brother inherits everything. I don't think it would be that hard for the devs to add.
 
Sleight of Hand said:
I've heard this mentioned but wasn't aware that it was confirmed. I'll have to check. Do you know if it works consistently?
Click to expand...
Never used it myself, but from what I've heard it works fine.

Essentially the reverse of primogeniture, whereby the youngest son/brother inherits everything. I don't think it would be that hard for the devs to add.
Click to expand...
I'll add it to the list.
 
Meneth said:
Actual bugs should be reported rather than posted here ;)
Click to expand...

It's not really broken in the game, it's just that modding it causes it to break. ( it's probably not meant to be modded.)
 
Thank you for this list. It would really be useful.

And signed, I guess.
 
Meneth, I just tested your matrilineal theory with Tamar the Great of Georgia:

Code: 
466517 = {
	name="Tamar"
	female = yes
	dynasty=507
	martial=8
	diplomacy=7
	intrigue=7
	stewardship=8
	religion="orthodox"
	culture="georgian"
	add_trait="charitable"
	add_trait="diligent"
	add_trait="patient"
	add_trait="lustful"
	add_trait="zealous"
	add_trait="grey_eminence"
	father=216515
	mother=216540
	1166.1.1={
		birth="1166.1.1"
	}
	1187.1.1 = {
		give_nickname=nick_the_great
	}
	1189.1.1={
		add_spouse = 466516
	}
	1212.1.8={
		death="1212.1.8"
	}
}

I made her the main partner in her marriage to David Soslan of Alania, and it loaded up as a regular marriage.

They are of the same dynasty, though, so I'm not sure if that played a part in the outcome.

I really do think we need a proper matrilineal marriage function, though, as it seems pretty random at the moment. I'm sure it's not WAD.
 
Sleight of Hand said:
Meneth, I just tested your matrilineal theory with Tamar the Great of Georgia:

Code: 
466517 = {
	name="Tamar"
	female = yes
	dynasty=507
	martial=8
	diplomacy=7
	intrigue=7
	stewardship=8
	religion="orthodox"
	culture="georgian"
	add_trait="charitable"
	add_trait="diligent"
	add_trait="patient"
	add_trait="lustful"
	add_trait="zealous"
	add_trait="grey_eminence"
	father=216515
	mother=216540
	1166.1.1={
		birth="1166.1.1"
	}
	1187.1.1 = {
		give_nickname=nick_the_great
	}
	1189.1.1={
		add_spouse = 466516
	}
	1212.1.8={
		death="1212.1.8"
	}
}

I made her the main partner in her marriage to David Soslan of Alania, and it loaded up as a regular marriage.

They are of the same dynasty, though, so I'm not sure if that played a part in the outcome.

I really do think we need a proper matrilineal marriage function, though, as it seems pretty random at the moment. I'm sure it's not WAD.
Click to expand...

If you use a combination of effect = { } and add_spouse_matrilinear (spelling?) you can set matrilinear marriages. Taking tamar as an example it would be :

Code: 
466517 = {
	name="Tamar"
	female = yes
	dynasty=507
	martial=8
	diplomacy=7
	intrigue=7
	stewardship=8
	religion="orthodox"
	culture="georgian"
	add_trait="charitable"
	add_trait="diligent"
	add_trait="patient"
	add_trait="lustful"
	add_trait="zealous"
	add_trait="grey_eminence"
	father=216515
	mother=216540
	1166.1.1={
		birth="1166.1.1"
	}
	1187.1.1 = {
		give_nickname=nick_the_great
	}
	1189.1.1={
		add_spouse = 466516
                effect = {
                      spouse = {
                           remove_spouse = spouse
                           add_spouse_matrilinear = ROOT
                      }
                 }
	}
	1212.1.8={
		death="1212.1.8"
	}
}

That would change the marriage to a matrilinear one. Although if you started after his death it would be recorded as regular

EDIT: just checked, the command is add_spouse_matrilineal
 
Last edited:
EDIT:
In the history files we can use employer = ID to get this effect, to put characters in specific courts at a certain date. Basically I want an extension of this command to make it available to the scripting engine and take targets.

Original below.

I'd like to get a 'employer' command, to move someone to a target's court. Currently we can change someone's liege, but this won't do it for unlanded characters, and isn't always the right choice. Basically it should work like 'banish' only with a set target court.

'employer' (or whatever) should take any valid identifier like 'liege', 'father', 'mother', 'PREV', 'FROM', 'ROOT' etc..

Example code if this were implemented:
Code: 
character_event = {
	id = foo
	desc = "As a child, you should really be at home with your parent."
	picture = "GFX_evt_child_play"
	
	trigger = {
		is_ruler = no
		NOT = { age = 16 )
		NOT = { any_liege = { dynasty = ROOT } }
		NOT = { at_location = father }
		NOT = { at_location = mother }
		OR = {
			father = { is_alive = yes }
			mother = { is_alive = yes }
		}
		NOT = { has_global_flag = startup_children_moved }
	}
	mean_time_to_happen = {
		days = 1
	}
	
	option = {
		name = "Go Home"
		IF = { #father alive
			limit = { father = { is_alive = yes } }
			[COLOR="#FF8C00"]employer = father[/COLOR]
		}
		IF = { #mother alive
			limit = { father = { is_alive = no } mother = { is_alive = yes } }
			[COLOR="#FF8C00"]employer = mother[/COLOR]
		}
		set_global_flag = startup_children_moved
	}
}
 
Last edited:
As in the Lux Invicta thread:

"I really feel we need a way to have infinite definable pentarchy systems ("pentarchy = germanic" instead of "pentarchy = yes") :p"
 
abitlity to add a negative/exclusive preresiquites for buildings. to make the construction of a build excluding the possibility to build another later.
in clear, to create separate/specialised buildings chains.
 
jordarkelf said:
EDIT:
In the history files we can use employer = ID to get this effect, to put characters in specific courts at a certain date. Basically I want an extension of this command to make it available to the scripting engine and take targets.

Original below.

I'd like to get a 'employer' command, to move someone to a target's court. Currently we can change someone's liege, but this won't do it for unlanded characters, and isn't always the right choice. Basically it should work like 'banish' only with a set target court.

'employer' (or whatever) should take any valid identifier like 'liege', 'father', 'mother', 'PREV', 'FROM', 'ROOT' etc..

Example code if this were implemented:
Code: 
character_event = {
    id = foo
    desc = "As a child, you should really be at home with your parent."
    picture = "GFX_evt_child_play"
    
    trigger = {
        is_ruler = no
        NOT = { age = 16 )
        NOT = { any_liege = { dynasty = ROOT } }
        NOT = { at_location = father }
        NOT = { at_location = mother }
        OR = {
            father = { is_alive = yes }
            mother = { is_alive = yes }
        }
        NOT = { has_global_flag = startup_children_moved }
    }
    mean_time_to_happen = {
        days = 1
    }
    
    option = {
        name = "Go Home"
        IF = { #father alive
            limit = { father = { is_alive = yes } }
            [COLOR=#FF8C00]employer = father[/COLOR]
        }
        IF = { #mother alive
            limit = { father = { is_alive = no } mother = { is_alive = yes } }
            [COLOR=#FF8C00]employer = mother[/COLOR]
        }
        set_global_flag = startup_children_moved
    }
}
Click to expand...
Try using reverse_banish.
Arko said:
abitlity to add a negative/exclusive preresiquites for buildings. to make the construction of a build excluding the possibility to build another later.
in clear, to create separate/specialised buildings chains.
Click to expand...
Will add it.
Darkgamma said:
As in the Lux Invicta thread:

"I really feel we need a way to have infinite definable pentarchy systems ("pentarchy = germanic" instead of "pentarchy = yes") :p"
Click to expand...
Will add it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back