[Forum Game] - World in Revolution: 1900

unmerged(271387)

Field Marshal

19 Badges

Feb 20, 2011

3.137

32

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• Sep 11, 2012

• Add bookmark
• #1.621

The King of Denmark would also like to announce that he and his people are going to participate in the 1908 London Olympics.We also would like to announce that denmark after so many world and regional crisis has officially entered a economical crisis.While Denmark has a 5-year-plan to avert this and if all goes well we will be back on to our feet by 1912-1913,we would like if anyone could invest in the Danish economy.The King assures you that such investments will have a good payoff in the near future,and with international help Scandinavian people might once again not feel ignored by the rest of the world.Ofcourse,it is only understandable if you can't helo the Danish people,for we live in such an unstable world,filled with war and destruction.

~His Royal Highness, King Frederick VIII of Denmark and the Danish People

 

Morrell8

Lt. General

78 Badges

Jan 20, 2010

1.209

15

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• Sep 16, 2012

• Add bookmark
• #1.622

OOC: Just to ensure that people don't forget about this, Fry will be returning tomorrow. Respective GMs should write their parts of the update and send them to Fry.

 

unmerged(271387)

Field Marshal

19 Badges

Feb 20, 2011

3.137

32

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• Sep 16, 2012

• Add bookmark
• #1.623

OOC:So tomorrow we will have an update?

 

Morrell8

Lt. General

78 Badges

Jan 20, 2010

1.209

15

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• Sep 16, 2012

• Add bookmark
• #1.624

videonfan said:

OOC:So tomorrow we will have an update?

Click to expand...

OOC: Probably not tomorrow.

 

Frymonmon

President of California

29 Badges

Jul 21, 2010

772

32

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• Sep 17, 2012

• Add bookmark
• #1.625

Due to what seems to be lack of enthusiasm, and the same thing from the old WiR 1861, there seems to be a gluttony of players, which bogs down the update pace and whatnot. So I propose a small Poll for everyone here who plays.

A. Keep WiR 1900 as is
B. Remove players from WiR 1900
C. Close WiR 1900 and make WiR 1836

 

etranger01

Sphinx of the Tuileries

92 Badges

Aug 18, 2010

1.125

86

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• Sep 17, 2012

• Add bookmark
• #1.626

C.

 

jacob-Lundgren

GM/Brutal Werewolf Leader

Moderator

69 Badges

Sep 18, 2001

2.601

51

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• Sep 17, 2012

• Add bookmark
• #1.627

I lean C but will vote C or B to try and make A lose I suppose. We are a bit bloated on silly nations sadly. Though I lean on C if we do the start more carefully to avoid what hit 1900 and kept it from being another 1861.

 

KeldoniaSkylar

Private

103 Badges

Mar 28, 2008

21

5

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• Sep 17, 2012

• Add bookmark
• #1.628

I'd go with A, and offer the my services writing updates if needed. If not, then B is second vote.

 

Duke of Britain

Lt. General

38 Badges

Oct 11, 2010

1.359

490

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• Sep 17, 2012

• Add bookmark
• #1.629

C.

 

jacob-Lundgren

GM/Brutal Werewolf Leader

Moderator

69 Badges

Sep 18, 2001

2.601

51

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• Sep 17, 2012

• Add bookmark
• #1.630

mmmmm fine then I will pick one.


C

 

MastahCheef117

Genro

58 Badges

Jul 1, 2009

1.176

158

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• Sep 17, 2012

• Add bookmark
• #1.631

I say B. This game is great and needs to stay, in my opinion. I'd have no problem with an 1836/1861/whatever you are contemplating, but I'd like 1900 to stay. I'd like A but seeing as how it seems somewhat impossible, we could shave off the unimportant/small/weak nations to make things easier for the GMs, so my final choice is B.

 

Seek75

Share Our Wealth!

35 Badges

Oct 7, 2010

2.804

1

www.youfail.org

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• Sep 17, 2012

• Add bookmark
• #1.632

B.

 

NikoHoI3

Prince Regent of Yugoslavia

5 Badges

Mar 13, 2010

792

14

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• Sep 17, 2012

• Add bookmark
• #1.633

I like this game but maybe C. is the way to go second would be A.

 

Last edited: Sep 17, 2012

Shock3r

Car Thief

19 Badges

Sep 15, 2010

51

0

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• Sep 17, 2012

• Add bookmark
• #1.634

B

 

Spectre17

Duke of Vantage

8 Badges

Feb 9, 2012

199

0

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• Sep 17, 2012

• Add bookmark
• #1.635

C. If C does win I might also start a 1701 game which would only have 10 or so players. I'm not completely sure about this but I like the idea.

 

unmerged(54970)

Major

Mar 18, 2006

689

169

• Sep 17, 2012

• Add bookmark
• #1.636

A.

No matter what, the game progresses.

Thing is, there is lack of it, because people don't feel like IC, there should be penalties (and no bonus) for the IC thing, as like -1 in rolls.

 

Mr. Santiago

Colonel

37 Badges

Jan 22, 2011

930

52

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• Sep 17, 2012

• Add bookmark
• #1.637

Well, I for one like how the game's going.... well, to be honest, the good stuff outwheights the bad stuff for a tiny bit.
Anyhow, I say A.

If not, then B, then C

 

Syriana

Bas de Merde

24 Badges

Dec 18, 2009

1.117

68

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• Sep 17, 2012

• Add bookmark
• #1.638

In fairness, I believe that this thread only went quiet because people were waiting for the update. I do agree, however, that a smaller player-base would increase the pace of play and updates. On the other hand, considering there are currently 26 players in this game, a smaller game would see many players losing out. I would vote for Option C, but I am still amenable to Option B; if we simply pare down the less active nations from this game, we can increase the pace without punishing those who are still actively contributing.

 

Boris ze Spider

The Smiling Knight

58 Badges

Oct 10, 2009

4.387

1

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• Sep 17, 2012

• Add bookmark
• #1.639

I vote for option A or B. I feel like if we go with option C we wil just face the same problem we face with 1900 and 1861 in a few turns

 

The Fish

Sergeant

9 Badges

Apr 12, 2012

84

0

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• Sep 17, 2012

• Add bookmark
• #1.640

C