+ Reply to Thread
Page 8 of 25 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 18 ... LastLast
Results 141 to 160 of 487

Thread: 1.06 Wishlist

  1. #141
    Quote Originally Posted by Wraith094 View Post
    What I'd like to see in the future are:

    I. Reworked Emperor/Empire mechanics: HRE too strong, Byzantines(?), more possible empires

    IA. Holy Roman Empire: it's too powerful and stable
    What game are you playing?

    In any I had so far, the HRE always ends up being eaten up by Civil War - with all the other European Powers cheerfully preying Duchies off it's borders.
    100 years into the game, the Emperor has a hard time fighting offensive wars at all, being so bled out from fighting his own Dukes. That's really a special kind of "stable and powerful"...

  2. #142
    I like these ideas the CK+ mod aims to implement (not the the MOD is my cup of tea given its crazy de jure empires).

    - More dynamic civil wars: Vassals without high loyalty that demand titles or favors to stay loyal, while loyalist vassals give you additional support.
    - Vassals with whom you have marriage alliances become more loyal. Marry your way into a stable realm.
    - Rebalance province values to better match history.
    The Vassal marriage alliances is inspired. Kinda key aspect to medieval statecraft, securing loyalty that way.

  3. #143
    Field Marshal Hootieleece's Avatar
    HoI AnthologyDeus VultDivine WindHOI3: Their Finest HourVictoria: Revolutions
    SengokuVictoria II: Heart of DarknessRome: Vae VictisCK2: Holy KnightEuropa Universalis IV: Pre-order

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    3,266
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by h3+ View Post
    the ability to raise levies by duchy or kingdom. it would make regional conflicts more manageable
    you can do that NOW. In the military screen. under the tab vassals. You can raise the personal or All levies an of individual vassal.

  4. #144
    Lt. General Andrzej I's Avatar
    Crusader Kings IIDeus VultMagickaMarch of the EaglesVictoria: Revolutions
    SengokuVictoria 2Victoria II: A House DividedVictoria II: Heart of DarknessMount & Blade: Warband
    Mount & Blade: With Fire and SwordCK2: Holy Knight500k clubEuropa Universalis IV: Pre-orderWarlock 2: The Exiled
    EUIV: Wealth of NationsEUIV: Conquest of ParadiseEUIV: Res PublicaCrusader Kings II: Legacy of RomeCrusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
    Crusader Kings II: Sunset InvasionCrusader Kings II: The RepublicCrusader Kings II: The Old GodsCrusader Kings II: Sons of AbrahamCrusader Kings II: Rajas of India
    Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    San Jose, United States
    Posts
    1,280
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrzej I View Post
    Some way to provisionally hold a title and not add onto its history immediately. It bugs me some that whatever titles I create, I am added onto the history, even if I grant it out a few days later. Or, worse yet, when the dynastic holder of a title dies out, giving me a title. I think it would be nice if there was a check, perhaps forcing the ruler to hold the title for a mere month, before they get added to the history and affect the regnal list of names.
    Adding onto this: elections. I wish that they were not so tied onto ethnicity as it currently seems. In fact, I'm not sure I've seen more than but a handful of dukes vote for a king-candidate of another ethnicity. Makes running a multi-ethnic kingdom rather difficult
    Quote Originally Posted by Ascanian View Post
    I like these ideas the CK+ mod aims to implement (not the the MOD is my cup of tea given its crazy de jure empires).
    Off-topic, but there's a module included with the CK+ mod that disables those empires
    List of AARs:
    House Tyrell in Seven Kingdoms: A Game of Thrones MultiplayAAR
    Gesta Capetingorum - Updated upon the twelfth day of September, the year of our Lord and Savior 2014

  5. #145
    Field Marshal Isaios's Avatar
    For The GloryHearts of Iron IIIMagickaSengokuVictoria II: Heart of Darkness
    Warlock: Master of the ArcaneCK2: Holy Knight500k clubEuropa Universalis IV: Pre-order

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Oslo, Norway
    Posts
    3,645
    Three things:

    1. Change the scoring system to be Dynasty based. Using the in-game Dynasty score as the measure of success would lend more weight to playing the dynastic way.
    1.1. Compare the end-score with other dynasties in the game you just finished.

    2. Change the Raise Realm Levies from getting direct personal control over your vassals troops, to your vassal joining your war more like allies. How much they like you, coupled with laws would still determine how large a portion they raise.
    2.1. If the war is about pressing claims for a vassal, let that affect troop-numbers also.

    3. Make raised levies MUCH more expensive, and also have upkeep on "dormant" levies.

    Apparently 4 things:

    4. Nicknames affect dynastic score. A guy known in his time as the Great would be somewhat more prestigeous for his dynasty than another known as "the Unready".
    4.1. Bring back beatification, and let that be a title increasing dynastic prestige. Add it as an ambition.
    Last edited by Isaios; 23-04-2012 at 20:15.
    I mean exactly what I write.
    Unless I'm being sarcastic, ironic or exaggerating or understating for effect. Or using allegory.

    Mein Führer! I can walk!
    Soylent Grün ist menschenfleisch!!

  6. #146
    3. Make raised levies MUCH more expensive, and also have upkeep on "dormant" levies.
    Ummmm ugh NO! Mercs and Holy Orders cost enough as it is don't need more costs to our regular levies I'd like to build structures in the game thank you very much.

  7. #147
    Field Marshal Isaios's Avatar
    For The GloryHearts of Iron IIIMagickaSengokuVictoria II: Heart of Darkness
    Warlock: Master of the ArcaneCK2: Holy Knight500k clubEuropa Universalis IV: Pre-order

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Oslo, Norway
    Posts
    3,645
    Quote Originally Posted by MasterofMagic View Post
    Ummmm ugh NO! Mercs and Holy Orders cost enough as it is don't need more costs to our regular levies I'd like to build structures in the game thank you very much.
    Chicken

    As it is now, I can have all levies raised all the time (whyever I would is another question) and never go in the red. for one, that's as far from historicity as you can get, and for the other, there is never a question if going to war is the smart move. You always make more money at war, than at peace. There's really no downside to warfare. Which there should be, if for no other reason than to make diplomatic expansion a viable alternative.
    I mean exactly what I write.
    Unless I'm being sarcastic, ironic or exaggerating or understating for effect. Or using allegory.

    Mein Führer! I can walk!
    Soylent Grün ist menschenfleisch!!

  8. #148
    Quote Originally Posted by Isaios View Post
    Chicken

    As it is now, I can have all levies raised all the time (whyever I would is another question) and never go in the red. for one, that's as far from historicity as you can get, and for the other, there is never a question if going to war is the smart move. You always make more money at war, than at peace. There's really no downside to warfare. Which there should be, if for no other reason than to make diplomatic expansion a viable alternative.
    I thought back then you didn't have professional standing-armies, meaning that they did it without pay, only due to vassal hierarchy/relations of medieval times? What you're paying for is basically just food and initial war supplies. But I agree that there should be a downside to warfare. Maybe add a feature to choose whether or not pay +/- fees for the equipment/food/shelter(Maybe a need to rest in towns?), the result of high or low pay for these supplies would be desertation, levies dying, etc?

  9. #149
    Sergeant Lord D.Andrews's Avatar
    Crusader Kings IIDeus VultEU3 Complete

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Connecticut, United States
    Posts
    75
    I would love to have some more diplomatic options. Say forinstance I try to Arrest the Queen and she flees to another court. That in real life would have diplomatic consiquences, Give me the ability to request they turn her over we go to war. They perhaps can have responses of, Risk war and harbor fellon, Ransom fellon for X, turn fellon over and gain prestiege or a allie.

    please let me name Grandchildren.

    Please let me chose if I want a nickname, each ruller being "The great" gets old. Dialogue say can be , " you have earned the nackname " The Great" do you acknowledge this nickname Yes Gain prestiege, No gain piety

  10. #150
    Corporal Ltn.Owning's Avatar
    Crusader Kings IIDivine WindFor the MotherlandHearts of Iron IIIHeir to the Throne
    Semper FiVictoria 2500k club

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Sweden, Uppsala
    Posts
    32
    Being able to play as anyone of my choice.
    Who doesn't want to be Venice in the fourth crusade for example?

  11. #151
    Some improvements to the character searching screen would be very much appreciated.

    -Search option for my dynasty only
    -Only show the characters under my direct control

    Edit: I do realize you can sort characters by dynasty, but thats not enough in my opinion. As you cant sort them by stats etc this way.

  12. #152
    Field Marshal Mad King James's Avatar
    Crusader Kings IIDeus VultEuropa Universalis 3EU3 CompleteDivine Wind
    Heir to the ThroneCK2: Holy Knight500k clubEuropa Universalis IV

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Vancouver BC Canada
    Posts
    6,936
    Better support for map mods larger than 2048x2048 pixels
    No good deed goes unpunished.

  13. #153
    Technology advancement through port cities!

  14. #154
    - Give mongols abilities to sack all buildings(destroy up to 50% of tiers - random) in a barony after taking it from disloyal vassals. Mongols did not tolerate any disloyalty and killed every person they could find to guarantee tribute is paid to them regularly. Or mongol option to sack a barony after siege period. For those that want to play a ck2-eu3 conversion.. I think it would make it where the arabs are where they are regularly in EU3 if the mongols could decimate them.

    - Random chance to reduce a building by 1 tier during a siege. Make it not to common but catapulting boulders/stones or burning/diseased cows/bodies(mongols) into a city means something is going to break or burn!


    ~ forgot something
    Last edited by Sparticulous; 26-04-2012 at 16:09.

  15. #155
    Colonel KristopherWG's Avatar
    Crusader Kings IIVictoria 2500k club

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Steam is spyware.
    Posts
    1,073
    Blog Entries
    4
    Effect of and reaction to traits, events, etc, based on reacting character's religion or culture, as opposed to universal.

  16. #156
    If your vassals had +80 relation with the previous king, the heir should get a relation bonus for the first few years of his reign.

  17. #157
    Wild-eyed fanatic Chipchat2's Avatar
    Crusader Kings IIEuropa Universalis 3Hearts of Iron IIIEuropa Universalis III: In NomineEU3 Napoleon's Ambition
    Europa Universalis: RomeSengoku500k clubEuropa Universalis IV

    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Barbarian Territory
    Posts
    135
    Exclude Kings and Emperors from the victory tallies of Crusades

  18. #158
    landless title playable.

  19. #159
    that i can breed different types of dragon and utilize them ibn war.

  20. #160
    I would like to have the Transfer Vassal command more efficient. When I'm getting negative relationship penalties because I'm the liege of something in their de jure county or duchy I would like to have a separate header for people under de jure so I don't have to scroll through 100 different barons and bishops when I want to transfer one castle or church.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 8 of 25 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 18 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts