Sorry, but im not a fan of the crusading system. Needs some more tweeks IMHO. I dont like the fact that Poland is in Spain, Munster in Jerusalem, and Norway is in Western Africa.
Sorry, but im not a fan of the crusading system. Needs some more tweeks IMHO. I dont like the fact that Poland is in Spain, Munster in Jerusalem, and Norway is in Western Africa.
That is... tons of fixes.
Totally NOT minor, this is a huge boon to coastal empire like ERE.MINOR:
- Embarked armies no longer suffer attrition
I'm not complaining, coastal empires needed this badly, along with the tax boost for coastal provinces cause those ship levies are expensive!
The cost/benefit for coastal warfare is about right, with this. Traveling to Gibralter from Constantinople with a doom fleet could kill off a large portion of your army.
And trying to participate in a crusade for ascalon from scandinavia, holy crap it was horrible!
What are they coupled to now, and are they still hardcoded?
Anything that gives the player more choice and control in how their ruler acts and interacts is good.
Sounds like someone declaring independence can build the needed warscore without having to seize a large number of holdings from the former liege, then? Good.





Can anyone confirm if an external kingdom can be absorbed into an empire?











are those de Jure HRE?
Some of the changes are great, especially those that add more things to do, or more options!
But please no de iure Kingdom of Pomerania. It never existed. If you are doing it because of the Wends, call it the Wends, and in that case, while I'm not absolutely sure, I believe Stettin shouldn't be de iure in it. Pomerania does belong in de iure Poland from late 12th century on.
Speaking of Poland, I'm surprised that Yatvyagi and Jacviez (which sounds like a different spelling of the same name in both cases) are parts of de iure Kingdom of Poland or Duchy of Masovia. Those weren't historically parts of Poland or Masovia, nor did the respective rulers have any good claims on the chieftains who ruled the tribes there. From a roleplaying point of view, this is actually bad because I need to include those provinces in calculations or even go and get them or something, when playing as Poland. In one situation they were involved in Duchy of Masovia title usurpation by someone under the Golden Horde.
CK2 Succession Survival Guide
CK 2 AARs:
Dominus Regni Poloniae
Lives of the Saints
Land's End
CEO, EMEA
Commenting makes me happy.
Kudos. Lots of little things I wanted to see and some big ones.
Is it just me or all the random courtiers now completely terrible? I know I'm a small count and don't have a big court but my current Martial has a rating of 2 and my spymaster has intrigue 5. I'm not asking for superhuman courtiers, but someone with the rating of 8+ might be nice
Interface question: where's the button for creating titular titles (and how do I find out about the scripted capitals)?
CK2 Succession Survival Guide
CK 2 AARs:
Dominus Regni Poloniae
Lives of the Saints
Land's End
CEO, EMEA
Commenting makes me happy.



My 25 year old Duke just died, and it said he died due to being very stressed.
The man was living in a remote island in scotland... don't know why he was stressed at all...![]()
CK2 Succession Survival Guide
CK 2 AARs:
Dominus Regni Poloniae
Lives of the Saints
Land's End
CEO, EMEA
Commenting makes me happy.
Even before this patch I always moved the duchy of Carinthia back to the HRE and the German Kingdom, but I always moved Aquileia to the duchy (margraviate) of Verona, so that this region would stay Italian
.
IIRC Pomeralia became Polish, but the duchy of Pomerania eventually went to the HRE, but I share your general concerns about a kingdom of Pomerania. Regarding Jacwiez and Yatvyagi I reshuffled the region so that a duchy of Podlasie can be created.
Can anyone confirm what happens for empires with non-de-jure kingdoms? Do the kingdoms become de-jure?
If not, do the duchies at least become de-jure?