Born to Breed: The Estridsen Lectures
Harald III Estridsen the Conqueror
memory of chastity, searching for the meaning of life, inappropriate gestures, on ambition, the perils of alliteration, on despondency, quoting Saxo, invasion, battles, a crown, more battles, blood to the ankles, new laws, despicable actions, exporting nephews, putting the boot in, the dangers of inbreeding, the dangers of third-rate battles, another brother bites the dust.
Welcome back, class.
As you no doubt recall, following the death of his chaste wife and cousin Margrethe, queen of Denmark, king Harald sought new meaning in life and ended up tying the knot with a bright and bold young Norman, Adelise de Brionne of Apulia, who was brave as a lion, sweet as sin, half king Harald's age, and determined to jolly him up well and good.
That's a very crude gesture, 0Emmanuel, but yes, fornication may very well have been near the top of her mind, for certainly churning out children of her own must have been a high priority, but as it turned out, there was considerably more to her ambition than the pursuit of personal pleasure for purposes of power, if I may allow myself a bit of alliteration, which is always a dangerous drug for the ordered mind. Indulge too much and you'll end up with a mind like a clock, going cuckoo once an hour. But I digress.
For the Ashes of his Fathers
King Harald's mood lifted with his bright young wife around, always ready to lend a hand with maintenance of his estates, always ready for a fight when he needed to let off steam, always ready to - yes, class, well guessed - always ready to satisfy his least desire. Being middle-aged and feeling deeply despondent, he needed more than that – he needed to show the world that he still mattered, that he was still a strong man, and that he was a king to be reckoned with. Perhaps he was even thinking of posterity and thinking that his legacy was small indeed compared to his illustrious ancestors?
But how?
Saxo's Gesta Danorum tells us the basics of the story and it is remotely possible that the following conversation wasn't made up out of whole cloth but carries vestiges of historical fact; I wouldn't bet on it, but it would be nice to think so.
Ahem. And it came to pass that on the first anniversary of their marriage, over a quiet cup of wine, Queen Adelise suggested an easy short victorious war against a weak unsuspecting neighbour as a cure for king Harald's despondency, to which Harald, considering this beneath his honour, answered:
Yet my despondency is such,
As you too must abhor;
I could not love thee, dear, so much,
Loved I not Honour more!
Thus having prickled his pride, the cunning Adelise, who had expected the rejection, raised the stakes,
saying:
One realm is lost to violence,
heresy is rampant,
One lord is excommunicate,
an enemy of god,
One people suffer the yoke,
Danes are persecuted,
One realm, one people, one lord,
Who will answer?
Comprehending the direction of her thoughts, king Harald spoke, saying:
Hold your tongue, dear, and tempt me not. I cannot make answer. He is family and an ally!
To which queen Adelise retorted that the task might well be harsh, but who but Harald was man enough to reclaim the realm for God? Who had the better right when the emperor had failed? Feeling king Harald's opposition slipping, she masterfully invoked the memory of his ancestors:
Yet, how can man die better
Than facing fearful odds,
For the ashes of his fathers,
And the temples of his gods?
King Harald mulled her words a full quarter of an hour and then arose in all his dread majesty, saying:
For the murder of their father Ragnar by Ælla, the Lodbrokssons let answer with the great heathen army. For the massacre of St. Brice's Day and the murder of his sister by Æthered, my great-grandfather let answer with his mostly christian army. Now Harold the Saxon has fallen from grace, perverted all that is holy, and is persecuting the Danes. The only question I should be considering is this: Am I a lesser man than my ancestors?
The Danish Fleet, Summer 1080.
Raised the king up the Danish weapon-take and hired he the Company of the Rose, and went he then forth to conquer.
Ahem.
Right, no more Saxo. While undoubtedly a valuable historical document, it is hell on the voice. To put it bluntly, king Harald took every warrior of Denmark that he could pry loose from his vassals, hired as many mercenaries as he could afford, and went to war. England had been ravaged by warfare ever since the invasions of 1066 and currently Harold the Saxon, excommunicate and enemy of god, was fighting the four mightiest dukes of England in a war with no end in sight. Upon this war-torn land Harald descended like a vulture.
As is well known, Harald III confounded all expectations when he landed in Cornwall that summer rather than ravaging the east coast as was customary, and he proceeded to roll up Harold's forces in a lightning campaign sweeping east through Somerset and Bedford. The decisive turning point in the war was the battle of St. Pauls on August 14, 1081.
Battle of St. Pauls, August 14, 1081.
Harold's loyalists fought on for some time, but they were a spent force, Harold was imprisoned, and king Harald took the crown of England.
With Harold defeated, the dukes of Lancaster, Kent, and Norfolk and the duchess of Northumberland united in opposition to Harald and the war went into a shorter yet more bloody phase. As the united duchies gathered most of their troops in one huge army and marched south, king Harald gathered his own armies and sent out to meet them.
They met in Oxford and the rivers ran red. The casualties, though dwarfed in absolute terms by those of later ages, were catastrophic by the standards of the time. The dukes' army was eradicated and of Harald's army, for every three men who had stood tall and strong in the morning, only one was hale at the end of the day. As a weary Harald prepared to invade the duchies and siege the unprotected towns, the dukes gave in. They didn't surrender, but they did accept king Harald's crown.
The Dukes Give In, November 10, 1081.
But They Are Not Happy Campers.
Map of Europe, November 10, 1081.
Bloody Harry
Victory was his, yet he had made powerful new enemies and it was only a matter of time before they acted against him, so king Harald decided to strike first. With the Danish nobility still drunk on the heady brew of victory, he passed several laws in succession strengthening the power of the monarch: First a law increasing the Danish crown's authority, enabling the king to revoke the titles of traitors and appoint the leaders of armies, second a law requiring nobles to pay a small tax. Nothing extraordinary, merely a tenth to help defray the cost of the armies needed to keep England well and truly pacified. Both laws were swiftly accepted.
Hardly had the ink dried before Harald III, king of Denmark and England, performed what latter historians have considered his most despicable act. Harold the Saxon, who had once been king Harold, a staunch Danish ally with several family members married into the Ylving family, and who was now merely an English duke who had honourably accepted Harald's terms of conquest, was let out of jail paying a considerable ransom. Hardly had he returned to his domains than Harald ordered his arrest on the grounds of being an excommunicate and enemy of god. Harold tried to rebel against this dastardly act but he stood no chance and was soon returned to jail, stripped of land.
This set the pattern for the rest of his reign. Whenever king Harald got a whiff of conspiracy or intrigue from the English, he immediately ordered the arrest of the conspirator. Anybody resisting arrest was fought, imprisoned, and stripped of the title to a county, anybody jailed, whether resisting or not, was either ransomed off immediately or left to rot.
And every single county Harald claimed by force of law he granted to an unlanded Estridson nephew, of whom there were several to choose between.
Victorious in England, on the home front Harald was sorely disappointed with his son Bjørn, his only son by the long-gone Margrethe, who showed zero evidence of higher brain functions and the sort of mushy thinking best suited for the priestly calling.
The dangers of inbreeding, 1082.
His young wife had recently granted him a second young son, but for the moment, Bjørn was it, though he might perhaps be better suited for the priesthood. At this point I should, perhaps, point out that England and Denmark as two separate kingdoms had different laws of succession. England worked by primogentiure, Denmark by an elective kingship where, in practice, the nominee was
usually the oldest son, when the son was of age, but not always. With Harald III having no adult heir, his heir to the English crown was his brother Erik. To avoid splitting his newly united realm, Harald announced that until a son of his reached majority, Erik would be the heir to the Danish crown as well... thus displacing his previous choice, their younger brother Benedict.
From 1080-1083 Harald spent most of his time in one war-camp or another, putting out rebellions on the Baltic coast and stomping on ambitious vassals in England, the last vestiges of his crushing despondency gone and replaced by a wild spirit that left little room for opposition to his plans.
Yet even the greatest king cannot stand against the great leveller. In the otherwise utterly insignificant battle of Thorn, October 19, 1083, king Harald was maimed by a valiant rebel, his helmet crushed by an unfortunate blow. His death was announced five days later, and king Harald III, king of Denmark and England, was as dead as merit-based grading of students.
Exeunt king Harald III, October 24, 1083.
So exit Bloody Harry and welcome Erik the Merry, the third of Svend II Estridsens sons to take the throne, and a king whose long reign brought a certain much-needed measure of stability to the realm as well as fascinating advances in the field of inquisitorial procedures. Not to forget that other small thing – I'm sure even
you sorry lot know what I'm referring to, yes? Any takers?
….
Well, I guess that was too much to be hoping for. You may be the flower of human civilization, my dear students, but lord knows which type of flower. A venus flytrap, perhaps.
Class dismissed.